OWENS CORNING - OCIL RECRUITMENT
ASSIGNMENT - PHASE A. 18-2-98
INTERVIEW FOLDER FLOW-CHART.
|
REGISTRAR |
CANDIDATE |
PRELIM. INTERVIEWER |
PKM |
MR. TAMAHANE (OWC/NS) |
FINAL INTERVIEWER |
|
$\bullet$ check Contents &
Seal. |
$\rightarrow$ Carry to
Interview Room. |
$\bullet$ Receive/Open. |
$\bullet$ Enter 'rating' in own
copy of Interview Schedule. |
||
|
$\bullet$ Give to candidate to
copy (after checking ID/Badge). (Encl 24) |
$\bullet$ check all content
available. |
$\rightarrow$ Go to PKM. |
|||
|
$\rightarrow$ Also Carry Copy
to Let PKM Know. |
$\bullet$ check I.D. |
$\bullet$ Carry/check
"CALL-SLIP" with "REMARKS" column on Prelim. Int.
Evaluation - Sheet. |
|||
|
$\bullet$ After Interview, Fill
in Prelim. Int. Evaluation Sheet. |
|||||
|
$\bullet$ Fill in FINAL CALL
SLIP (If Approp.) |
|||||
|
$\bullet$ Enter 'Rating' in own
copy of Int. Schedule. |
|||||
|
$\bullet$ Hand-over folder to
PKM |
|||||
|
$\bullet$ Add
"remarks" column (brought by OWC/NS) of FOLDER. |
|||||
|
$\bullet$ check content |
ONLY FOR FINALISTS |
||||
|
$\bullet$ Transfer
"RATING" to own copy of Interview Schedule |
|||||
|
$\bullet$ If short-listed for
final interview, Insert FINAL INTERVIEW EVALUATION SHEET, with Name/PEN/Date |
$\bullet$ Check contents |
$\bullet$ Check Contents |
|||
|
$\bullet$ Tell candidate to
Come/ Not come next day. |
$\rightarrow$ Take-out salary
slip/ (if not offered salary sheet) & Put in FINAL INTERVIEW EVAL. |
$\bullet$ Conduct FINAL
INTERVIEW |
|||
|
$\bullet$ In case outstation,
tell him to collect his reimbursement |
$\bullet$ Fill in INTERVIEW
EVAL. SHEET (incl. Appointment Recommendations) |
||||
|
$\bullet$ Take back I.D.
Card/"May We know - You" (If not already given to Interviewer). In
such case, add "May we" to folder |
$\rightarrow$ Receive a copy of
Appt. Letter. |
$\bullet$ Enter 'Prelim' as
well as 'Final' rating in own Interview Schedule |
|||
|
$\bullet$ verify
tenure/certificates & Pay-slips. |
$\bullet$ Issue Appt.
Letter/Offer Letter copy to PKM |
$\rightarrow$ Handover folder
to Mr. Tamahane |
|||
|
$\bullet$ DATA-ENTRY |
MMR Feb 1998 $\frac{1}{16}$
Manual of Mass Recruitment
CONTENTS
- Proposal / Quotation
- Position / Vacancy details / Man-Specifications /
Job Description / Posting Location
- Advertisement
- Experts for Rating of Applications
- Interview
- Schedule / time per candidate
- Whom to call
- Computerisation.
PROPOSAL / QUOTATION
Important features of a proposal
are
- $\bullet$ Brief background of client
- $\bullet$ Recruitment Requirement (as indicated /
given to us)
- This will cover
- No. of positions
- No. of Vacancies under each position
- Man-Specifications
- Job-Descriptions
- Posting locations
- Approx Annual Salary for each position
- Date by which different candidates are expected
to join.
- $\bullet$ Arithmetic of Recruitment
- This will indicate
- No. of candidates to be appointed
- No. of " " for final interview by
Client
- No. of Candidates for Prelim. Interview by 3P
- No. of " " to be sent Call-letters
- No. of " " who should be found A/B/C
rated on application
- No. of applications to be received.
- $\bullet$ Time-Frame
- This would be a bar-chart & tabulation showing
target-dates against each activity
- $\bullet$ Our Professional Fees / Terms
- This would state whether our fees are
- linked to the no. of persons appointed &
joined (Contingent upon joining/appointing)
- linked to starting salary offered to each
candidate appointed (as % of starting gross annual salary)
- lump-sum per person appointed/joined
- lump-sum linked to designation-level.
- lump-sum for the assignment (Retainership)
irrespective of the no. of persons appointed & their starting
salaries
- Payment Schedule / advance / adjustment
- Out-of-Pocket Expenses
- $\bullet$ Validity of our Offer
- $\bullet$ Our Guarantees
POSITION / VACANCY DETAILS /
MAN-SPECIFICATIONS / JOB DESCRIPTIONS / POSTING LOCATION
These details will help in
- $\bullet$ drafting a good job advertisement
- $\bullet$ deciding size of advertisement
- $\bullet$ " " Media / No of insertions /
Editions
- $\bullet$ " " Media-cost / getting client
approval
- $\bullet$ Working-out "Arithmetic of
Selection"
- $\bullet$ No. of Candidates that will need to be
interviewed
- $\bullet$ No. of interview-panels (experts) and the
no. of candidates that each expert will interview on each day
- and therefore
- $\bullet$ No. of days over which interviews will
continue
- $\bullet$ No. of interview-rooms / testing-rooms /
reception-rooms that will be required
- $\bullet$ Location of interview-Venue
CLIENT DETAILS / PRODUCT
LITERATURE
This should include
- $\bullet$ What products/services are offered by
client
- $\bullet$ Worldwide manufacturing locations /
distribution arrangements
- $\bullet$ Past / Current / Projected Sales turnover
- $\bullet$ Organisation Structure
- $\bullet$ Annual Report / Financial Ratios
- $\bullet$ No. of Employees
- $\bullet$ JV / collaborations
- $\bullet$ -
- $\bullet$ -
Such details about the client
help us in drafting a good advertisement to project proper image of the client.
We could also prepare a CLIENT-PROFILE
to enclose with interview call letter.
One can also use 35 mm Slides
/ Video Cassettes / Multi-media Clips to enlighten candidates while they
are waiting to take tests / waiting to see interviewed.
We have to "hard-sell"
our client.
ADVERTISEMENT
- $\bullet$ All advt will be in english language
-even if published in a local language newspapers.
- $\bullet$ Region (Edition) where to publish Advt.
- This will depend upon where the candidates are
likely to be working/ to be found
- $\bullet$ Type / level of Candidates will govern
type of news-media / city-edition:
- e.g: a) all "Accounts/Finance" related
positions must be advertised in ECONOMIC TIMES / FINANCIAL EXPRESS
- b) For Senior-level positions, "Business
India / Business Today / Business World" in addition to Times of
India
- c) Process-plant Personnel - Maharashtra / Gujrat
etc.
- d) Software Personnel - Bangalore / Hydrabad /
Mumbai / Chennai
We Should Compile a list Such as:
|
Type of Position |
Preferred News Media |
Preferred City Edition |
P.T.O
We should compile
"statistics" about our own "advts" such as
|
Type of Position /
Vacancies / Level |
Client |
Media |
Media Cost (Rs) |
City Editions |
Day of Advt (e.g. Monday to
Sunday) |
Response (No) |
|
From that City |
||||||
This will tell us
- $\bullet$ which type of newspapers/magazines are
read by which type of executives / candidates (i.e. popularity of a media
amongst certain niche markets (who reads what)
- $\bullet$ what is the "reach" of
each media
- $\circ$ in the City where published
- $\circ$ in the region
- $\circ$ rest of India
- (How many read where)
- $\bullet$ Cost effectiveness of each media
- $\circ$ No. of applications received per every Rs.
one lakh of Advt. Cost
- $\bullet$ Timing effectiveness
- $\circ$ Do sunday advt. produce more response than
other days? - Advt. on Public holidays
- $\circ$ Are there days on which people are
unlikely / less likely to read an Advt ?
- $\bullet$ SIZE effectiveness
- $\circ$ Do bigger advt. generate more response?
- $\circ$ Coefficient of correlation between SIZE
& RESPONSE
- $\bullet$ Circulation effectiveness
- Do media with greater circulation produce more
response?
- Generally? or for a given type of vacancy?
EXPERTS FOR RATING OF
APPLICATIONS
Generally we should try to have
separate set of experts to
- $\bullet$ Rate applications
- $\bullet$ Interview Candidates.
Occasionally same expert can do
both.
If an expert has to read the
entire bio-data before rating, then his daily output could be as follows:
|
Position / Level of Vacancy |
No. of bio-datas that can
be "rated" daily |
|
Senior-level (President / V.P.
/ GM) |
25 / 40 |
|
Senior Manager / Manager |
40 / 60 |
|
+ Executive / Supervisor |
60 / 80 |
|
+ Worker / Technician |
100 / 150 |
- At this level, daily rating output can
substantially go-up if advt. contains a FORM (Applicant-Profile)
which each candidate fills in & faxes, as we did in case of OWENS-CORNING
assignment.
P.T.O
"Broad" rating Criteria
:-
- $\bullet$ Does applicant fulfill advertised Man-Specifications?
(e.g. Age / Exp / Edu. Quali / Language / Health etc)
- $\bullet$ Has he worked (in the past) in "good"
Companies? Is he currently working in a good company?
- $\bullet$ Is he stable or a job-jumper?
- $\bullet$ What is his current Salary level?
Too low / too high
- $\bullet$ Is he overqualified / over-experienced?
- $\bullet$ What is his current "designation-level"?
- $\bullet$ Does his industry / functional
background match the "job-description" for the
position?
Rating "Legend"
- A = Excellent
- B = Good
- C = Acceptable
- R = Reject
- P = Potential
- $\circ$ These are candidates who are
- totally unsuitable for the client but good
for our databank
- $\circ$ Unsuitable as far as the Client's "advertised"
vacancy is concerned but may be considered for client's future
requirements
INTERVIEW – schedule / time per
candidate
|
Level of Candidate |
Time / candidate (For
Prelim. Interview) |
|
GM / VP |
2 hours |
|
DGM / Sr. Manager |
1 hour |
|
Manager / Asst. Man. |
45 minutes |
|
Executives / Supervisors |
30 " |
|
Workers / Technicians |
20 " |
After each Candidate leaves, we
should allow $\min^s$ 5 minutes (at worker level) to a $\min^s$ of 15
minutes (at GM / VP level) before the next candidate is asked to go into
the interview-room. This time is needed for the Interviewer to fill-in INTERVIEW
EVALUATION SHEET, which he must do (before the next person walks in) when
his impressions about the candidate is still FRESH / VIVID.
At levels above "Sr.
Manager", we should allow a "gap" of time, so that
candidates do not "run into each other". At this level, each
executive candidate MUST be given a specific TIME-SLOT. He will normally
arrive 15 minutes before his specified time. For Senior Executives, it
would [P.T.O]
be highly desirable to have a
"segregated" sitting / waiting area, so that Incoming & outgoing
Candidates do not run into each other.
INTERVIEW – whom to call
- $\bullet$ Always first preference would be for
Candidates rated A &/B.
- $\bullet$ If we are falling short of desired
numbers, we should call "C"-rated.
- $\bullet$ Occasionally Client may impose other
conditions, which may compel us to call "C"-rated
candidates (in preference to A/B rated Candidates). Such conditions could
be
- $\circ$ Do not call "out-station"
candidates
- $\circ$ Do not call "" Candidates
from a particular
- REGION
- RELIGION
- COMMUNITY
- COMPANY
- COMPETITOR
- PUBLIC SECTOR
- ARMED FORCES
- UNIVERSITY EDUCATED
- etc
- $\bullet$ Do not call candidates who cannot
fluently converse in local language (e.g. Personnel Managers)
- $\bullet$ Do not call Candidates drawing above /
below a certain Salary-level / Experience level / Edu. level
It would be a good idea to
prepare a check-list and get client to fill-in as part of MAN-SPECIFICATION
SHEET.
COMPUTERISATION
- $\bullet$ Each Advt. must be given a unique [ADVT.
NO]. This is the "SOURCE" for applications/bio-datas.
This source must be mentioned/entered in database created for each Advt.
- At any time in future, we must be able to "retrieve/re-call"
all applications/ bio-datas received against a given [ADVT. NO].
- An Advt. may contain several positions.
"position-code NO" should form part of [ADVT. NO],
so that we are able to sort/retrieve/print, position-wise
- $\bullet$ Each applicant (irrespective of his
rating – A / B / C / R / P) must be given a [PEN] in the
series
- 00,000,000 – 00,999,999
- (This is the series, reserved for bio-datas
received in print/hardcopy than mail/courier/fax)
- $\bullet$ If we are hard-pressed for time
[which we will always be when handling an ADVERTISED, MASS-RECRUITMENT
ASSIGNMENT], in first phase, we should enter only that data which will
allow us to [PTO]
- $\bullet$ send a "one-line print out /
statement / folder" to Client
- $\bullet$ upload the database on Internet /
Extranet (i.e. database incorporating basic SEARCH-PARAMETERS
of
- $\circ$ Birthdate (Age)
- $\circ$ Edu. Quali.
- $\circ$ Exp. (yrs)
- $\circ$ Designation (Current)
- $\circ$ Function ( " )
- $\circ$ Industry ( " )
- usually stated by candidate.
- Rating Expert should write this.
- $\rightarrow$ In SECOND-PHASE of data-entry,
all other information about the candidate should be entered.
- $\rightarrow$ If "Rating" expert
has to "think hard" before writing this down, it may slow
down the output – so we could postpone this to phase II. – In which
case, of course, there is no point in uploading the truncated data on Internet
/ Extranet, since Personnel chiefs always want to HEAD-HUNT by function
& Industry!
I hope Context Cartridge /
ARDIS will solve this problem by JUNE 1998!

















No comments:
Post a Comment