MATCH INDEX ALGORITHM
MATCH-MAKER
Note
➤ This could have some relevance
to MATCH MAKER (which tool we have planned to develop).
➤ Someday, thousands of
jobseekers would have downloaded “Match Maker” and hundreds of these jobseekers
may be “online” at the same time (on different job portals), searching &
“matching” the job-adverts against their own resumes. We would have captured
the “resumes” when they try to “Activate” this tool. We may also “capture” the
job-adverts being searched/matched by each jobseeker (using Match Maker tool)
while he is “online,” so each user becomes our human job-advert “SPIDER”! Then,
I can “SERVE” matching job-adverts to each user, as soon as he comes online :)
27/09/2007
Gun Match
Oct. 17, 2006
Key words
starting with |
No. of
characters in Keywords |
|||||||||||||||||
A |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
15 |
17 |
18 |
B |
Rahul –
Saurabh Match-Index
Algorithm ➤
Let us index each of 655L resumes and create such a matrix (one for each
resume). ➤
Let us also create such matrices for each Designation keyword (1000-SS1) / IT
Skill keyword (88) / non-IT function (559?) etc. ➤
What are characteristics/attributes of a Word "C" (in any of these
matrices)?
➤
Let us assume there are 26 x 20 = 520 cells for each resume. ➤
And, 26 x 20 = 520 cells in Master keyword Matrix for any given desig
(IT-skill / Non-IT function). ➤
Now superimpose Master keyword Matrix on Resume Keyword Matrix. ➤
Retain only those cells in which a value is present in both. Reject all cells
with NULL value in both. ➤
Now check for ending alpha/character in both. |
|||||||||||||||||
C |
||||||||||||||||||
D |
||||||||||||||||||
E |
||||||||||||||||||
F |
||||||||||||||||||
G |
||||||||||||||||||
H |
||||||||||||||||||
I |
||||||||||||||||||
J |
||||||||||||||||||
K |
||||||||||||||||||
L |
||||||||||||||||||
M |
||||||||||||||||||
N |
||||||||||||||||||
O |
||||||||||||||||||
P |
||||||||||||||||||
Q |
||||||||||||||||||
R |
||||||||||||||||||
S |
||||||||||||||||||
T |
||||||||||||||||||
U |
||||||||||||||||||
V |
||||||||||||||||||
W |
||||||||||||||||||
X |
||||||||||||||||||
Y |
||||||||||||||||||
Z |
GuruMatch
Guru
Match |
Online
Jobsites Download |
Offline
Archive of text Resumes Database |
Match
Indexed On |
Designation
Keywords |
Skill /
Function Keywords |
Designation
(Select One) |
Master
List of Keywords |
Keywords
not relevant to this Assignment |
GH – Legal ☐ |
||
Am |
||
Hi |
||
Ap |
||
Th |
||
Const. Mgr ☐ |
||
Scientist /
Rep ☐ |
||
Ap |
||
Mi |
||
Am |
||
Match Index
search Results |
||
Identical Display (&
Database) in both cases viz: Online Resumes / Archived Resume |
Please select the "Weightage" you wish to
assign to "Match-Index Methods" shown below.
Match Index Method |
Weightage |
Designation Wise |
60 |
Function Wise |
|
Total |
100 |
# |
Match Index |
1 |
36 |
1235 |
|
18 |
(Process)
Second Step → Function Wise (Only 1235)
# |
Match Index |
Composite Index (Descending Order) |
Desig. Wise |
Func. Wise |
|
1 |
36 |
22 |
2 |
32 |
18 |
3 |
30 |
14 |
SAME PERSON V 2.0
Method A (viz: as per Designation) |
Method B (viz: as per Function) |
Composite |
60 |
40 |
100 |
Alternate Methods
Method A |
Method B |
Composite |
60 |
40 |
100 |
Method A |
Method B |
Composite |
(60 x 1/2) → 60 x 0.5 = 30 |
(40 x 1/2) → 40 x 0.5 = 20 |
(60 + 40) / 2 = 50 |
Method A |
Method B |
Composite |
(60 x 0.8) → 48 |
(40 x 0.2) → 8 |
48 + 20 = 68 |
Method A |
Method B |
Composite |
(60 x 0.4) → 24 |
(40 x 0.6) → 24 |
24 + 24 = 48 |
No comments:
Post a Comment