15-09-04
Abhi
STUCK TOO LONG?
OR
A JOB-JUMPER?
From a modern HR manager's point
of view, both kinds of candidates are
UNDESIRABLE.
Obviously, if an executive is
in Same Company for 20 years
OR
at Same "Desig. level"
for 10 years (maybe even 5!)
then, there is something WRONG!
Similarly, if a guy has changed 8
jobs in 12 years, then too, there is something (terribly) wrong!
How long will he stay with us?
But then,
What is too long or too short?
These "concepts/ideas"
tend to become "too subjective" and vary from one HR
manager to another.
Why do these tend to become
subjective?
Ans: Absence of Data with which
to compare a person.
Of course, availability of "Comparable
Data," by itself, does not make all HR managers,
ABSOLUTELY OBJECTIVE,
but, their "subjectivity"
gets reduced to a considerable extent.
Problem is
When an HR manager is going thru
a resume, it becomes very difficult for him to figure out,
When exactly that person
joined & left each company and how long did he work at each
place
What was his longest
"duration" & his shortest duration and with which
Companies.
What was his "Ave"
duration
How many jobs did he change
during his career.
The great advantage of ImageBuilder
is that, it presents all such data about a candidate in a very NEAT/CONCISE/CHRONOLOGICAL
format.
This format is very easy to
grasp.
It also enables an HR manager to
reach QUICK CONCLUSIONS, as to
Is this fellow a "Below
Average" plodder?
OR
a "Over-Ambitious"
job-jumper?
NOW, on top of this handy
tabulation, if we also present to an HR Mgr,
TENURE PROFILE
(see enclosure),
It would enable HR mgr. to look
at this candidate in TOTAL PERSPECTIVE,
—in relation to other comparable
executives.
NOW, an HR manager has a TOOL to
Take quick decision (Call or not
call?)
justify decision taken (If Boss
questions!).
With TENURE PROFILE, I feel HR
mgrs. would INSIST on ImageBuilders only!
TENURE PROFILE
How does my job-duration compare
with others, as on
Following is my job-duration
Data:
|
Employer |
From |
To |
Duration (in years) |
My Average Duration [ ]
|
Chart Title |
Population |
Data Points |
|
Group Profile : All
Executives |
Population $= 19342$ |
Longest Duration: [ ] yrs
Shortest Duration: [ ] yrs
Median Duration: [ ] yrs |
|
Group Profile : Executives
from same FUNCTION |
Population $= 2816$ |
Longest: [ ] yrs
Shortest: [ ] yrs
Median: [ ] yrs |
|
Group Profile : Executives
from same FUNCTION & DESIG. LEVEL. |
Population $= 349$ |
Longest: [ ] yrs
Shortest: [ ] yrs
Median: [ ] yrs |
(Note: Each chart is a
frequency distribution showing "% of Executives" on the y-axis vs.
"Duration (Years)" on the x-axis, centered roughly between 4-5 years,
representing the "Group Profile" data listed in the table.)




No comments:
Post a Comment