Notes: September 2004

Graph 1 (Top)

Age Group: 11 AND 14
Population: 790
Data Points (Salary (Rs./Year) - No. of candidates):

(10K-0K): 120
(0K-10K): 246
(10K-20K): 207
(20K-30K): 127
(30K-40K): 56
(40K-50K): 26
(50K-60K): 14
(60K-70K): 7
(70K-80K): 2
(80K-90K): 2
(90K-100K): 1

Graph 2 (Bottom)

Age Group: 15 AND 26
Population: 1227
Data Points (Salary (Rs./Year) - No. of candidates):

(10K-0K): 302
(0K-10K): 588
(10K-20K): 179
(20K-30K): 60
(30K-40K): 23
(40K-50K): 6
(50K-60K): 2
(60K-70K): 2
(70K-80K): 1
(80K-90K): 3
(90K-100K): 1

Graph 1 (Top)

Age Group: 11 AND 35
Population: 1283
Data Points (Salary (Rs./Year) - No. of candidates):

(10K-0K): 260
(0K-10K): 648
(10K-20K): 292
(20K-30K): 114
(30K-40K): 47
(40K-50K): 17
(50K-60K): 6
(60K-70K): 11
(70K-80K): 4
(80K-90K): 2
(90K-100K): 2

Graph 2 (Bottom)

Age Group: 19 AND 30
Population: 977
Data Points (Salary (Rs./Year) - No. of candidates):

(10K-0K): 152
(0K-10K): 394
(10K-20K): 243
(20K-30K): 86
(30K-40K): 38
(40K-50K): 32
(50K-60K): 10
(60K-70K): 13
(70K-80K): 2
(80K-90K): 2
(90K-100K): 2

Graph 1 (Top)

Age Group: 11 AND 32
Population: 689
Data Points (Salary (Rs./Year) - No. of candidates):

(10K-0K): 120
(0K-10K): 236
(10K-20K): 146
(20K-30K): 88
(30K-40K): 52
(40K-50K): 27
(50K-60K): 13
(60K-70K): 10
(70K-80K): 9
(80K-90K): 6
(90K-100K): 2

Graph 2 (Bottom)

Age Group: 31 AND 34
Population: 564
Data Points (Salary (Rs./Year) - No. of candidates):

(10K-0K): 35
(0K-10K): 188
(10K-20K): 140
(20K-30K): 61
(30K-40K): 42
(40K-50K): 31
(50K-60K): 13
(60K-70K): 10
(70K-80K): 12
(80K-90K): 6
(90K-100K): 6

Graph 1 (Top)

Age Group: 11 AND 36
Population: 452
Data Points (Salary (Rs./Year) - No. of candidates):

(10K-0K): 45
(0K-10K): 119
(10K-20K): 103
(20K-30K): 53
(30K-40K): 42
(40K-50K): 29
(50K-60K): 21
(60K-70K): 16
(70K-80K): 6
(80K-90K): 9
(90K-100K): 6

Graph 2 (Bottom)

Age Group: 37 AND 38
Population: 199
Data Points (Salary (Rs./Year) - No. of candidates):

(10K-0K): 52
(0K-10K): 103
(10K-20K): 67
(20K-30K): 22
(30K-40K): 14
(40K-50K): 7
(50K-60K): 2
(60K-70K): 3
(70K-80K): 9
(80K-90K): 1
(90K-100K): 1

Graph 1 (Top)

Age Group: 11 AND 40
Population: 265
Data Points (Salary (Rs./Year) - No. of candidates):

(10K-0K): 55
(0K-10K): 70
(10K-20K): 40
(20K-30K): 20
(30K-40K): 12
(40K-50K): 2
(50K-60K): 2
(60K-70K): 2
(70K-80K): 2
(80K-90K): 2
(90K-100K): 2

Graph 2 (Bottom)

Age Group: 41 AND 42
Population: 174
Data Points (Salary (Rs./Year) - No. of candidates):

(10K-0K): 27
(0K-10K): 41
(10K-20K): 27
(20K-30K): 17
(30K-40K): 20
(40K-50K): 4
(50K-60K): 9
(60K-70K): 5
(70K-80K): 4
(80K-90K): 4
(90K-100K): 4

Graph 1 (Top)

Age Group: 11 AND 44
Population: 128
Data Points (Salary (Rs./Year) - No. of candidates):

(10K-0K): 8
(0K-10K): 12
(10K-20K): 31
(20K-30K): 14
(30K-40K): 15
(40K-50K): 9
(50K-60K): 6
(60K-70K): 19
(70K-80K): 8
(80K-90K): 3
(90K-100K): 3

Graph 2 (Bottom)

Age Group: 45 AND 46
Population: 117
Data Points (Salary (Rs./Year) - No. of candidates):

(10K-0K): 5
(0K-10K): 24
(10K-20K): 18
(20K-30K): 16
(30K-40K): 14
(40K-50K): 8
(50K-60K): 5
(60K-70K): 7
(70K-80K): 6
(80K-90K): 5
(90K-100K): 5

Graph 1 (Top)

Age Group: 11 AND 48
Population: 85
Data Points (Salary (Rs./Year) - No. of candidates):

(10K-0K): 11
(0K-10K): 24
(10K-20K): 10
(20K-30K): 6
(30K-40K): 15
(40K-50K): 3
(50K-60K): 4
(60K-70K): 7
(70K-80K): 5
(80K-90K): 0
(90K-100K): 0

Graph 2 (Bottom)

Age Group: 49 AND 50
Population: 64
Data Points (Salary (Rs./Year) - No. of candidates):

(10K-0K): 10
(0K-10K): 22
(10K-20K): 17
(20K-30K): 17
(30K-40K): 17
(40K-50K): 17
(50K-60K): 3
(60K-70K): 3
(70K-80K): 3
(80K-90K): 3
(90K-100K): 3

Graph 1 (Top)

Age Group: 11 AND 52
Population: 44
Data Points (Salary (Rs./Year) - No. of candidates):

(10K-0K): 13
(0K-10K): 15
(10K-20K): 11
(20K-30K): 4
(30K-40K): 1
(40K-50K): 0
(50K-60K): 0
(60K-70K): 0
(70K-80K): 0
(80K-90K): 0
(90K-100K): 0

Graph 2 (Bottom)

Age Group: 53 AND 54
Population: 39
Data Points (Salary (Rs./Year) - No. of candidates):

(10K-0K): 5
(0K-10K): 13
(10K-20K): 8
(20K-30K): 5
(30K-40K): 2
(40K-50K): 2
(50K-60K): 2
(60K-70K): 2
(70K-80K): 0
(80K-90K): 0
(90K-100K): 0

Graph 1 (Top)

Age Group: 11 AND 56
Population: 32
Data Points (Salary (Rs./Year) - No. of candidates):

(10K-0K): 4
(0K-10K): 9
(10K-20K): 7
(20K-30K): 6
(30K-40K): 3
(40K-50K): 3
(50K-60K): 0
(60K-70K): 0
(70K-80K): 0
(80K-90K): 0
(90K-100K): 0

Graph 2 (Bottom)

Age Group: 57 AND 58
Population: 21
Data Points (Salary (Rs./Year) - No. of candidates):

(10K-0K): 1
(0K-10K): 1
(10K-20K): 1
(20K-30K): 0
(30K-40K): 3
(40K-50K): 1
(50K-60K): 1
(60K-70K): 2
(70K-80K): 0
(80K-90K): 0
(90K-100K): 0

Graph 1 (Top)

Age Group: 59 AND 60
Population: 12
Data Points (Salary (Rs./Year) - No. of candidates):

(10K-0K): 2
(0K-10K): 1
(10K-20K): 1
(20K-30K): 0
(30K-40K): 1
(40K-50K): 4
(50K-60K): 1
(60K-70K): 0
(70K-80K): 0
(80K-90K): 0
(90K-100K): 0

Handwritten Note: "This set of graphs follow the exact pattern as 'Age' graphs, because of the simple equation/formula adopted by us in Computing "Total Exp". Hence entire credibility is lost! Age-wise graphs & Exp.-wise graphs appear absolutely identical with same "No:" on Y-axis! We must find a way!"

Top Graph (Scan_0011 - Upper):

Graph Title/Legend: FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION GRAPH, SALARY - WISE, Experience between 1 AND 2
Population: '799'
X-axis (Salary in thousands (Rs./Years)) vs. Y-axis (No. of candidates):

(10K): 112
(10K-20K): 245
(20K-30K): 207
(30K-40K): 127
(40K-50K): 58
(50K-60K): 26
(60K-70K): 14
(70K-80K): 7
(80K-90K): 5
(90K-100K): 2

Bottom Graph (Scan_0011 - Lower):

Graph Title/Legend: FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION GRAPH, SALARY - WISE, Experience between 1 AND 4
Population: '1122'
X-axis (Salary in thousands (Rs./Years)) vs. Y-axis (No. of candidates):

(10K): 362
(10K-20K): 568
(20K-30K): 178
(30K-40K): 60
(40K-50K): 23
(50K-60K): 8
(60K-70K): 6
(70K-80K): 2
(80K-90K): 1
(90K-100K): 3

Top Graph (Scan_0012 - Upper):

Graph Title/Legend: FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION GRAPH, SALARY - WISE, Experience between 5 AND 6
Population: '1283'
X-axis (Salary in thousands (Rs./Years)) vs. Y-axis (No. of candidates):

(10K): 352
(10K-20K): 548
(20K-30K): 292
(30K-40K): 114
(40K-50K): 47
(50K-60K): 17
(60K-70K): 4
(70K-80K): 11
(80K-90K): 2
(90K-100K): 2

Bottom Graph (Scan_0012 - Lower):

Graph Title/Legend: FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION GRAPH, SALARY - WISE, Experience between 7 AND 8
Population: '777'
X-axis (Salary in thousands (Rs./Years)) vs. Y-axis (No. of candidates):

(10K): 152
(10K-20K): 354
(20K-30K): 243
(30K-40K): 89
(40K-50K): 38
(50K-60K): 22
(60K-70K): 10
(70K-80K): 10
(80K-90K): 7
(90K-100K): 2

Top Graph (Scan_0013 - Upper):

Graph Title/Legend: FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION GRAPH, SALARY - WISE, Experience between 9 AND 10
Population: '589'
X-axis (Salary in thousands (Rs./Years)) vs. Y-axis (No. of candidates):

(10K): 96
(10K-20K): 238
(20K-30K): 148
(30K-40K): 99
(40K-50K): 52
(50K-60K): 27
(60K-70K): 13
(70K-80K): 10
(80K-90K): 9
(90K-100K): 6

Bottom Graph (Scan_0013 - Lower):

Graph Title/Legend: FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION GRAPH, SALARY - WISE, Experience between 11 AND 12
Population: '444'
X-axis (Salary in thousands (Rs./Years)) vs. Y-axis (No. of candidates):

(10K): 55
(10K-20K): 183
(20K-30K): 140
(30K-40K): 51
(40K-50K): 48
(50K-60K): 31
(60K-70K): 13
(70K-80K): 10
(80K-90K): 12
(90K-100K): 8

Top Graph (Scan_0014 - Upper):

Graph Title/Legend: FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION GRAPH, SALARY - WISE, Experience between 13 AND 14
Population: '432'
X-axis (Salary in thousands (Rs./Years)) vs. Y-axis (No. of candidates):

(10K): 65
(10K-20K): 119
(20K-30K): 103
(30K-40K): 82
(40K-50K): 42
(50K-60K): 21
(60K-70K): 21
(70K-80K): 16
(80K-90K): 18
(90K-100K): 5

Bottom Graph (Scan_0014 - Lower):

Graph Title/Legend: FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION GRAPH, SALARY - WISE, Experience between 15 AND 16
Population: '346'
X-axis (Salary in thousands (Rs./Years)) vs. Y-axis (No. of candidates):

(10K): 69
(10K-20K): 103
(20K-30K): 57
(30K-40K): 22
(40K-50K): 4
(50K-60K): 7
(60K-70K): 7
(70K-80K): 9
(80K-90K): 9
(90K-100K): 1

Top Graph (Scan_0015 - Upper):

Graph Title/Legend: FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION GRAPH, SALARY - WISE, Experience between 17 AND 18
Population: '265'
X-axis (Salary in thousands (Rs./Years)) vs. Y-axis (No. of candidates):

(10K): 61
(10K-20K): 75
(20K-30K): 40
(30K-40K): 28
(40K-50K): 18
(50K-60K): 12
(60K-70K): 9
(70K-80K): 1
(80K-90K): 0
(90K-100K): 2

Bottom Graph (Scan_0015 - Lower):

Graph Title/Legend: FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION GRAPH, SALARY - WISE, Experience between 19 AND 20
Population: '171'
X-axis (Salary in thousands (Rs./Years)) vs. Y-axis (No. of candidates):

(10K): 5
(10K-20K): 27
(20K-30K): 41
(30K-40K): 27
(40K-50K): 17
(50K-60K): 20
(60K-70K): 6
(70K-80K): 9
(80K-90K): 8
(90K-100K): 4

Top Graph (Scan_0016 - Upper):

Graph Title/Legend: FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION GRAPH, SALARY - WISE, Experience between 21 AND 22
Population: '126'
X-axis (Salary in thousands (Rs./Years)) vs. Y-axis (No. of candidates):

(10K): 0
(10K-20K): 8
(20K-30K): 31
(30K-40K): 14
(40K-50K): 15
(50K-60K): 8
(60K-70K): 6
(70K-80K): 19
(80K-90K): 4
(90K-100K): 3

Bottom Graph (Scan_0016 - Lower):

Graph Title/Legend: FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION GRAPH, SALARY - WISE, Experience between 11 AND 24
Population: '101'
X-axis (Salary in thousands (Rs./Years)) vs. Y-axis (No. of candidates):

(10K): 0
(10K-20K): 24
(20K-30K): 20
(30K-40K): 15
(40K-50K): 14
(50K-60K): 7
(60K-70K): 5
(70K-80K): 7
(80K-90K): 4
(90K-100K): 5

Top Graph (Scan_0017 - Upper):

Graph Title/Legend: FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION GRAPH, SALARY - WISE, Experience between 25 AND 26
Population: '95'
X-axis (Salary in thousands (Rs./Years)) vs. Y-axis (No. of candidates):

(10K): 0
(10K-20K): 11
(20K-30K): 24
(30K-40K): 10
(40K-50K): 6
(50K-60K): 13
(60K-70K): 4
(70K-80K): 3
(80K-90K): 8
(90K-100K): 4

Bottom Graph (Scan_0017 - Lower):

Graph Title/Legend: FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION GRAPH, SALARY - WISE, Experience between 25 AND 26
Population: '93' (Note: '93' is manually read from the graph point, the legend says '93')
X-axis (Salary in thousands (Rs./Years)) vs. Y-axis (No. of candidates):

(10K): 10
(10K-20K): 10
(20K-30K): 22
(30K-40K): 18 (Approximation between 18 and 20 based on line)
(40K-50K): 17
(50K-60K): 13 (Approximation between 12 and 14 based on line)
(60K-70K): 9
(70K-80K): 9
(80K-90K): 9
(90K-100K): 3

Top Graph (Scan_0018 - Upper):

Graph Title/Legend: FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION GRAPH, SALARY - WISE, Experience between 29 AND 30
Population: '44'
X-axis (Salary in thousands (Rs./Years)) vs. Y-axis (No. of candidates):

(10K): 0
(10K-20K): 14
(20K-30K): 15
(30K-40K): 13
(40K-50K): 11
(50K-60K): 1
(60K-70K): 0
(70K-80K): 0
(80K-90K): 0
(90K-100K): 2

Bottom Graph (Scan_0018 - Lower):

Graph Title/Legend: FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION GRAPH, SALARY - WISE, Experience between 31 AND 32
Population: '38'
X-axis (Salary in thousands (Rs./Years)) vs. Y-axis (No. of candidates):

(10K): 0
(10K-20K): 1
(20K-30K): 13
(30K-40K): 8
(40K-50K): 6
(50K-60K): 3
(60K-70K): 2
(70K-80K): 2
(80K-90K): 3
(90K-100K): 2

Top Graph (Scan_0019 - Upper):

Graph Title/Legend: FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION GRAPH, SALARY - WISE, Experience between 33 AND 34
Population: '32'
X-axis (Salary in thousands (Rs./Years)) vs. Y-axis (No. of candidates):

(10K): 4
(10K-20K): 7
(20K-30K): 9
(30K-40K): 7
(40K-50K): 6
(50K-60K): 4
(60K-70K): 3
(70K-80K): 3 (Approximation)
(80K-90K): 3
(90K-100K): 3

Bottom Graph (Scan_0019 - Lower):

Graph Title/Legend: FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION GRAPH, SALARY - WISE, Experience between 35 AND 36
Population: '14'
X-axis (Salary in thousands (Rs./Years)) vs. Y-axis (No. of candidates):

(10K): 1
(10K-20K): 1
(20K-30K): 1
(30K-40K): 0
(40K-50K): 3
(50K-60K): 3
(60K-70K): 1
(70K-80K): 1
(80K-90K): 2
(90K-100K): 2

Top Graph (Scan_0020 - Upper):

Graph Title/Legend: FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION GRAPH, SALARY - WISE, Experience between 37 AND 38
Population: '12'
X-axis (Salary in thousands (Rs./Years)) vs. Y-axis (No. of candidates):

(10K): 2
(10K-20K): 1
(20K-30K): 1
(30K-40K): 0
(40K-50K): 0
(50K-60K): 1
(60K-70K): 0
(70K-80K): 4
(80K-90K): 1
(90K-100K): 1

Bottom Graph (Scan_0020 - Lower):

Graph Title/Legend: FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION GRAPH, SALARY - WISE, Experience between 39 AND 42
Population: '10'
X-axis (Salary in thousands (Rs./Years)) vs. Y-axis (No. of candidates):

(10K): 0
(10K-20K): 0
(20K-30K): 2
(30K-40K): 1
(40K-50K): 0
(50K-60K): 0
(60K-70K): 0
(70K-80K): 0
(80K-90K): 0
(90K-100K): 0

Top Graph:

Title: SHOW GRAPH | SALARY vs No. of Candidates
Legend: FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION GRAPH | SALARY - WISE | DESIGNATION = 'Trainee' | POPULATION = '164'
Y-axis: No. of candidates (0 to 35)
X-axis: SALARY (Categories: 50k, ( 50k 100k), ( 100k 150k), ( 150k 200k), ( 200k 250k), 250k)
Data Points: 15, 31, 22, 22, 9, 6 (The handwritten categories below the x-axis are: 50k, ( 50k 100k), ( 100k 150k), ( 150 200), ( 200 250), 250)

Bottom Graph:

Title: SHOW GRAPH | SALARY vs No. of Candidates
Legend: FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION GRAPH | SALARY - WISE | DESIGNATION = 'Executive Officer' | POPULATION = '1105'
Y-axis: No. of candidates (0 to 400)
X-axis: SALARY (Categories: 5000k, 10000k, 15000k, 20000k, 25000k, 30000k, 35000k, 40000k, 45000k, 50000k, 50000k)
Data Points: 95, 305, 325, 160, 75, 55, 35, 30, 20, 10, 5

Top Graph:

Title: SHOW GRAPH | SALARY vs No. of Candidates
Legend: FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION GRAPH | SALARY - WISE | Age between 21 AND 24 | POPULATION = '799'
Y-axis: No. of candidates (0 to 280)
X-axis: SALARY in thousands (Rs./Years) (Categories: 5000k, 10000k, 15000k, 20000k, 25000k, 30000k, 35000k, 40000k, 45000k, 50000k, 50000k)
Data Points: 95, 265, 205, 125, 50, 35, 12, 5, 2, 1, 0

Bottom Graph:

Title: SHOW GRAPH | SALARY vs No. of Candidates
Legend: FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION GRAPH | SALARY - WISE | Age between 25 AND 26 | POPULATION = '1117'
Y-axis: No. of candidates (0 to 360)
X-axis: SALARY in thousands (Rs./Years) (Categories: 5000k, 10000k, 15000k, 20000k, 25000k, 30000k, 35000k, 40000k, 45000k, 50000k, 50000k)
Data Points: 75, 301, 310, 251, 125, 55, 25, 22, 10, 5, 1

Graph:

Title: SHOW GRAPH | SALARY vs No. of Candidates
Legend: FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION GRAPH | SALARY - WISE | DESIGNATION = 'Trainee' | POPULATION = '164'
Y-axis: No. of candidates (0 to 35)
X-axis: SALARY in thousands (Rs./Years) (Categories: 5000k, 10000k, 15000k, 20000k, 25000k, 30000k, 35000k, 40000k, 45000k, 50000k, 50000k)
Data Points: 19, 31, 22, 22, 3, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0

Top Graph:

Title: SHOW GRAPH | SALARY vs No. of Candidates
Legend: FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION GRAPH | SALARY - WISE | DESIGNATION = 'Executive Officer' | POPULATION = '164'
Y-axis: No. of candidates (0 to 40)
X-axis: SALARY in thousands (Rs./Years) (Categories: ( 50k), ( 50k 100k), ( 100k 150k), ( 150k 200k), ( 200k 250k), ( 250k 500k))
Data Points: 19, 35, 22, 22, 23, 5
Handwritten note: ok, Table

Bottom Graph:

Title: SHOW GRAPH | SALARY vs No. of Candidates
Legend: FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION GRAPH | SALARY - WISE | DESIGNATION = 'Executive Officer' | POPULATION = '1105'
Y-axis: No. of candidates (0 to 550)
X-axis: SALARY in thousands (Rs./Years) (Categories: ( 100k), ( 100k 200k), ( 200k 300k), ( 300k 400k), ( 400k 500k), ( 500k 600k), ( 600k 700k), ( 700k 800k), ( 800k 900k), ( 900k 1000k), ( 1000k))
Data Points: 450, 430, 114, 20, 5, 4, 10, 5, 1, 0, 3
Handwritten note: ok, Table

Top Graph:

Title: SHOW GRAPH | SALARY vs No. of Candidates
Legend: FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION GRAPH | SALARY - WISE | DESIGNATION = 'Senior Manager' | POPULATION = '4463'
Y-axis: No. of candidates (0 to 2200)
X-axis: SALARY in thousands (Rs./Years) (Categories: ( 100k), ( 100k 200k), ( 200k 300k), ( 300k 400k), ( 400k 500k), ( 500k 600k), ( 600k 700k), ( 700k 800k), ( 800k 900k), ( 900k 1000k), ( 1000k))
Data Points: 720, 1840, 1036, 430, 195, 87, 31, 27, 2, 2, 2
Handwritten note: ok, Annual Salary (Rs. 000/year), Table

Bottom Graph:

Title: SHOW GRAPH | SALARY vs No. of Candidates
Legend: FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION GRAPH | SALARY - WISE | DESIGNATION = 'General Manager' | POPULATION = '1197'
Y-axis: No. of candidates (0 to 280)
X-axis: SALARY in thousands (Rs./Years) (Categories: ( 100k), ( 100k 200k), ( 200k 300k), ( 300k 400k), ( 400k 500k), ( 500k 600k), ( 600k 700k), ( 700k 800k), ( 800k 900k), ( 900k 1000k), ( 1000k))
Data Points: 110, 153, 247, 195, 157, 150, 87, 85, 49, 101, 101
Handwritten note: ok, Table

Overall Handwritten Note: We are losing a lot of valuable space in this arrangement! what can we do to reduce this space & make it available for bigger Y Axis?

Top Graph:

Title: SHOW GRAPH | SALARY vs No. of Candidates
Legend: FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION GRAPH | SALARY - WISE | DESIGNATION = 'Senior Manager' | POPULATION = '4463'
Y-axis: No. of candidates (0 to 2200)
X-axis: SALARY in thousands (Rs./Years) (Categories: ( 100k), ( 100k 200k), ( 200k 300k), ( 300k 400k), ( 400k 500k), ( 500k 600k), ( 600k 700k), ( 700k 800k), ( 800k 900k), ( 900k 1000k), ( 1000k))
Data Points: 720, 1840, 1036, 430, 195, 87, 31, 27, 2, 2, 2
Handwritten Note: Duplicated! | President & MD to be plotted.

Bottom Graph:

Title: SHOW GRAPH | SALARY vs No. of Candidates
Legend: FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION GRAPH | SALARY - WISE | DESIGNATION = 'General Manager' | POPULATION = '1197'
Y-axis: No. of candidates (0 to 280)
X-axis: SALARY in thousands (Rs./Years) (Categories: ( 100k), ( 100k 200k), ( 200k 300k), ( 300k 400k), ( 400k 500k), ( 500k 600k), ( 600k 700k), ( 700k 800k), ( 800k 900k), ( 900k 1000k), ( 1000k))
Data Points: 97, 153, 247, 195, 157, 150, 87, 85, 49, 101, 101

Top Graph (Age):

Title: SHOW GRAPH | AGE vs No. of Candidates
Legend: FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF EXECUTIVES | AGE - WISE | POPULATION = '7188'
Y-axis: No. of candidates (0 to 800)
X-axis: AGE (Years) (1 to 65)
Selected Data Points (approx): 377, 473, 616, 719, 664, 511, 390, 309, 272, 252, 194, 150, 137, 102, 91, 75, 62, 53, 49, 42, 43, 39, 36, 35, 30, 26, 22, 18, 14, 10, 8, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0, 0
Handwritten note: This is ok - except that when launched on Recruitmy, we will not display the figures just above each point. but a surfer can click on Table link to see the actual values. | Table

Bottom Graph (Experience):

Title: SHOW GRAPH | EXPERIENCE vs No. of Candidates
Legend: FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF EXECUTIVES | EXPERIENCE - WISE | POPULATION = '7188'
Y-axis: No. of candidates (0 to 800)
X-axis: EXPERIENCE (Years) (1 to 65)
Selected Data Points (approx): 377, 473, 616, 719, 664, 511, 390, 309, 272, 252, 194, 150, 137, 102, 91, 75, 62, 53, 49, 42, 43, 39, 36, 35, 30, 26, 22, 18, 14, 10, 8, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0, 0
Handwritten Note: Because of our definition/ equation, the shape of "actual" Years of Exp is these hos. coincide with "Age Profile". It looks "cooked up" (Which it is!). With exactly SAME figs/nos. appearing on both graphs, we are losing CREDIBILITY! So we must find another method of calculating "Total Yrs of Exp" which is (and appears) more Credible.

Graph:

Title: SHOW GRAPH | DESIGNATION LEVEL vs No. of Candidates
Legend: FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF EXECUTIVES | DESIGNATION LEVEL-WISE | POPULATION = '7188'
Y-axis: No. of candidates (0 to 5000)
X-axis: DESIGNATION LEVEL (Categories: Trainee, Executive Officer, Manager, General Manager, President/Executive Director, Managing Director)
Data Points: 164, 1105, 4463, 1297, 744, 125

Scan_0029.jpg: TENURE FREQUENCY PROFILE

Graph Title: TENURE FREQUENCY PROFILE (YEARS OF SERVICE IN A GIVEN JOB)

Sample Size: 250

Y-axis: NUMBERS (INCIDENCES)

X-axis: TENURE (YEARS)

Data Points (Tenure in Years, Incidences):

$1$ year: 40
1 year: 73
2 years: 43
3 years: 33
4 years: 21
5 years: 14
6 years: 3
7 years: 4
8 years: 5
9 years: 11
10 years: 3
11 years: 2
12 years: 4
13 years: 2
14 years: 3
15 years: 1

Job Tenure Data Table

Table Title: Job Tenure (yrs) - Total

Page	1	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15	Total
1	3	8	6	2	1	2	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	26
2	8	10	6	3	1	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	30
3	3	4	2	3	3	1	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	19
4	2	4	5	3	1	2	-	-	1	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	19
5	4	7	3	2	2	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	19
6	3	4	3	2	-	2	-	-	-	2	1	-	-	-	-	-	17
7	1	6	7	5	3	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	23
8	7	7	2	4	3	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	25
9	2	9	4	3	3	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	23
10	4	7	4	3	3	3	1	-	2	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	28
11	3	7	1	3	1	2	-	-	1	1	2	-	-	-	-	-	21
Total	40	73	43	33	21	14	3	3	5	11	5	2	-	1	-	1	250

SALARY FREQUENCY PROFILE

Graph Title: SALARY FREQUENCY PROFILE (Salarywise Distribution of candidates in our database)

Sample Size: 158

Y-axis: NO. OF CANDIDATES

X-axis: ANNUAL SALARY (RS, 000)

Data Points (Salary Range (in Rs. 000), No. of Candidates):

0-50: 18
51-100: 29
101-150: 23
151-200: 24
201-250: 12
251-300: 12
301-350: 8
351-400: 12
401-450: 1
451-500: 6
501-550: 1
551-600: 1
601-650: 3
651-700: 3
701-750: 1
751-800: 3
801-850: 2
851-900: 2
901-950: 1
951-1000: 1

AGE FREQUENCY PROFILE

Graph Title: AGE FREQUENCY PROFILE (Age-wise Distribution of candidates)

Sample Size: 75

Y-axis: NUMBERS (FREQUENCY)

X-axis: AGE (YEARS)

Data Points (Age in Years, Frequency):

23: 2
24: 6
25: 4
26: 4
27: 6
28: 2
29: 6
30: 4
31: 8
32: 1
33: 8
34: 2.5 (approx 2 or 3)
35: 2.5 (approx 2 or 3)
36: 2
37: 2
38: 2
39: 1
40: 1
41: 2
42: 1
43: 1
44: 2
45: 1

AGE VS. SALARY SCATTERGRAM

Graph Title: AGE VS. SALARY SCATTERGRAM (2)

Sample Size: ---

Y-axis: SALARY (CRs. LAKHS)

X-axis: AGE

Notes:

This Scattergram will be very similar to "Years of Exp. Vs. Salary" Scattergram.
With sufficiently large sample-size, "Line of best fit" and "Age-wise" salary frequency distribution graphs can be automatically plotted & displayed when clicked on a given "Age".

Sketch/Example on Graph:

A frequency distribution curve is drawn roughly centered at Age 36, showing a typical distribution of salaries (from approx. 7 lakhs to 20 lakhs) for that age.

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE VS. SALARY SCATTERGRAM

Graph Title: YEARS OF EXPERIENCE VS. SALARY SCATTERGRAM

Sample Size: 55

Y-axis: SALARY (CRs. Lakhs)

X-axis: YEARS OF EXPERIENCE

Notes:

If we have a sample-size of, say, 10000 candidates:

Statistical Software (WWW.Softglare(X.com), can plot a "Line of best fit".
For each "AGE", software can also plot a "Frequency Distribution graphs" as show below. Maybe be an HR Manager simply moves cursor over on any given "years of Experience", a click, and corresponding graph will appear in a small window. This would be a very powerful tool where we can charge Rs. 25 per click!

Sketch/Example on Graph:

A box is drawn around data points near 14 years of experience, and a dashed frequency distribution curve is sketched to its right, showing a concentration of salaries for that experience level.

Translate

Wednesday, 22 September 2004

GRAPHICAL PROFILES