Pl. refer to my yesterday’s note to Rajul / SriRam (with copies to you).
Enclosed find 5 worksheets as follows:
| Person | No. of Assignments | No. in Worksheet |
|---|---|---|
| Venu | 19 | 12 |
| Sai | 16 | 13 |
| Usha | 18 | 13 |
| Monsha | 10 | 3 |
| Michelle | 24 | 8 |
| Subtotal | 87 | 49 |
| Pranati | 3 | yet to give |
| Sri Ram | 2 | 2 |
| Raju | 10 | 9 |
| Keyur | 2 | 2 |
| Team | 4 | 2 |
| Grand Total | 104 | 64 |
(*) In my yesterday’s note, by mistake this figure is shown as 116.
📄 Page 2 of 3
From the worksheets received, you will find that nearly all assignments get “stuck” at screen OET 9 (Candidate Listing).
SriRam has confirmed that these 19 assignments (from 5 worksheets received so far) WILL get entered into OES by next Saturday (21/9) – up to screen OET 9.
The reason these (assignments) get stuck here is because:
“System does not permit adding new names to the shortlist at a later date.”
So, obviously this is the first bug to kill, right?
If quickly eliminated, Consultants would be able to take one more step (i.e. enter screen OET 10) before getting stuck once again, on screen OET 11 (Interview Schedule).
📄 Page 3 of 3
I suggest you independently re-confirm my understanding/interpretation with the consultants, so you know which “bug” to attack first.
Also vigorously follow-up so that entry gets done by next Saturday for 49 assignments.
I enclose printouts given by Raju & SriRam, which lists 104 assignments (whereas the worksheets are received for 49 only!).
Please verify the discrepancy. Matters of “facts” cannot become matters of “opinion”!
-
Ashutosh has promised to keep ready by lunch → Cumulative Target vs Achievement graphs (individual as well as consolidated for entire company). Pl. upload on intranet today.
-
Deeba has promised to show you Part A & Part B demo tool to you on next Tuesday & to me on next Saturday. Follow up.
No comments:
Post a Comment