OES V 2.0 15/03/02
(Table with columns for Sl.No,
Name of the Company, Location, Date, Contact Person, Terms and Conditions,
Requirement, Professional Fee (%), Tax (%), Per Vacancy)
(Handwritten notes on the
side):
In OES V 2.0 we should
provide a HISTORICAL statement (REPORT) called “History of Terms sent
– client-wise,” so that, next time any Consultant is sending a Proposal
(Which include TERMS) to any client, such a historical statement POPS-UP
(automatically).
This would force the Consultant
to go thru the past records (incl. REMARKS columns), before sending out
the Proposal.
OES V 2.0 25/10/02
One important “Historical”
statement should be:
“History of Prelim. Interviews
conducted for (say) Mr. Mhatre”
So that,
If, Mr. Mhatre gets
shortlisted by anybody, while searching Member Database (In Module 1/OES),
there is a mention against his name that he has been interviewed earlier by
one/more of 3P Consultants. A click on this link/button would reveal
Executive Name: Mr. Mhatre
(Table with columns for To
View Assessment Form, Prelim. Interviewed (date) On, By (Consultant), Remarks,
For which Position, For that/each Client, Whether Appointed)
Such a “Historical Record”
would help the Consultant concerned to decide:
- Should he be interviewed (prelim) once again,
against current assignment?
- Can he be sent for FINAL interview straight
away, bypassing Prelim. interview?
Yogesh 21-1-98
Statistical Analysis of Executives
“registered on” and “placed thru” Web-Sites
The first such executive is about
to receive his appointment letter!
Someday (be it too long, I hope!)
we should have 5000 such cases! (We need not merely “hope” – we must try
hard to achieve this.)
When we do reach such a figure,
we must, simultaneously create a database which, we can statistically
analyse – and draw conclusions.
Such statistics could also
be used to boost the “image” of our websites.
In the enclosed pages, I have
put-down my thoughts on this. Please examine – then let us discuss with Nirmit
/ Thakur to decide what – if any – changes we will need to make in our INVOICE
format.
(Signature)
STATISTICS OF Executives
who registered directly on Internet / Extranet and got a job thru our efforts
FIELDS A
A.1 . Name of Executive
A.2 . PEN
A.3 . Date registered (i.e.
posted his resume on line)
A.4 . Current Salary
A.5 . Education (Degree)
FIELDS B
B.1 : Company Name (who offered
job thru “Head-hunt”)
B.2 : Industry (May have to be
deduced from database)
B.3 : Designation offered : e.g.
GM – Marketing, V.P., General Manager
B.4 : Designation Level : e.g.
General Manager, V.P.
B.5 : Function (To be derived
from designation) : Marketing
B.6 : Date of Appointment Letter
B.7 : Salary offered
B.8 : Invoice Amount
FIELDS A
Software will pick-up these data
directly from the Websites (Internet & Extranet).
FIELDS B
Software should pick-up these
data directly from the INVOICE. For this purpose, INVOICE-FORMAT should be
modified / standardised.
The whole idea is to generate the
statistics from the data already entered (somewhere or other) by
- The Executive (Candidate)
- The Concerned (in-house) Consultant (who
sent out
- - interview letter
- - interest letter
- to executive
- - Terms
- - Resume
- to Company
- - Invoice
- - Correspondence
- The Concerned COMPANY (e.g. – Purchase
order form, “Terms-acceptance” e-mail, Payment cheque, copy of Appointment
letter etc. etc.)
What kind of “statistics”
can be generated & how will these statistics “aid” in future
- - decision-making (w.r.t. say, marketing
strategy?)
- - publicizing our websites
$$[\text{Date of Appointment
Letter} (\text{B.6})] - [\text{Date Registered} (\text{A.3})] = \text{Elapsed
time}$$
Q. / Ans
How long (from date of
registration) will a candidate have to wait before landing a good job?
e.g.
% of executives (who register
with us) finding a job
- - within 1 month
- - within 6 "
- - within 12 "
- - Beyond 12 "
$$[\text{Current Salary}
(\text{A.4})] - [\text{Salary offered} (\text{B.7})] = \text{Salary gain
(}\%\text{ of Current salary)}$$
Q. / Ans
What kind of “Salary-gains” do
executives pick-up when they land a job thru our Web-services?
% of executives (who got jobs)
getting a “salary-gain”
- - of more than 10%
- - " " 20%
- - " " 50% etc.
Analysis of “Designation-Levels”
of all the executives (whom we
found a job thru our web-services), what % were placed at
- - M.D. level
- - President "
- - V.P. "
- - GM " etc
Analysis of “Functions”:
What % of executives got absorbed
in
- - Manufacturing / Production function
- - Marketing "
- - Finance "
- - HRD "
This shows which “function”
is in greater demand.
Analysis of Edu.
Qualifications:
% by Edu. Qualifications
This will tell us, who are in
greater demand
e.g. - Engineers (Which type?
Mech? Civil?)
Chartered Accountants (CCA)
Company Secretaries (CCS)
Management Graduates (MBA)
Cyril 8-9-98
Order Execution Module (Module
# 2)
I have already sent to you, some
3/4 weeks back, a folder containing my past notes (Spread over last 5/6 years)
on the Order Execution Module.
Now, I enclose herewith some
tables/screens on this subject. I send these because I am not sure whether
these were included in that folder.
During our meeting on 11/8, you
had indicated that you would start work on this module by Sept. 1 and complete
it by end Oct. 98. In light of this, I had requested you to prepare &
submit System Design Document by 22/8/98.
Since we have a very tight
time-frame of completion by end Oct., I request you to kindly expedite.
Regards
(Signature)
Module = Order Execution
Sub-module: Administrative Record
– MODE A
(Table structure for
Administrative Record – Mode A)
ESR No: (Field) Serial No:
(Field) Position: (Field)
PRE-ADVT. DETAILS
| ACTIVITY | Date Sent | Date
Approval |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| • Send draft ADVT. to client |
| |
| • Send Press-estimate | "
| |
| • Send Media-Plan (Paper /
Magazine) | " | |
| ADVT. Released Date | | |
| ADVT. Appeared Date | | |
RESPONSE DETAILS
| Position | No. of Applications
| Total | Rating – wise
:--- | :--- | :--- |
A | B | C | R | P |
POST – ADVT. DETAILS
| Activity | Date |
| :--- | :--- |
| - "Summary statement"
sent to client | |
| - "Specific Resumes"
" | |
Module: Order Execution
Sub-module: INTERVIEWS (Mode A +
Mode D + Mode H)
ESR No: (Field) Serial No:
(Field) Position: (Field)
(Table structure for candidate
selection and interview details)
| | A | B | C | Total | |
| No. of Candidates selected by
client for interviewing | |
|
Interview Date |
|||||
|
Location |
|
Date |
Date |
Date |
Date |
||
|
Call letters sent out on
$ For this Location |
|
Date |
|||||
|
For Detailed resumes sent to
client this Location $ |
Module: Order Execution
Sub-module: INTERVIEW (All Modes)
ESR No: (Field) Serial No:
(Field) Position: (Field)
(Table for interview planning by
position)
| Position | Interview Date | No.
called | No. Confirmed | No. Attended |
(Table for interview planning by
location)
| Location | Int. date | No.
called | No. Confirm | No. Attended |
(Table for preliminary interview
results)
| Name of Candidate who attended
Prelim Interview | Location where interviewed | Applr. Rating | Prelim.
Interview Rating | If short-listed for final | For which Position |
FINAL INTERVIEW DETAILS
| Name of Candidate called | Date
Called | Whether Attended | Outcome | Appt. Letter Issue date | Target Date of
Joining |
Module: Order Execution
Sub-module: Administrative Record
– MODE “D”/“H”
ESR No: (Field) Serial No:
(Field) Position: (Field)
(Table for administrative
activities)
| ACTIVITY | Date | Record
Covered |
| - One-line statement sent to
client | | |
| - Brief Resumes | ” | |
| - Fully Converted Resumes | ” |
|
| - Proposal sent | | |
| - Proposal signed by client | |
|
Module: Order Execution
Sub-module: ACCOUNTS
ESR No: (Field) Serial No:
(Field) Position: (Field)
ADVERTISEMENT ESTIMATE &
PAYMENT DETAILS
- - Advt. Agent:
- - Press Est. Amt:
- - Approved Date:
- - Advt Agency Bill No:
- - Bill Amt:
- - Client’s cheque No:
- - Cheque Amount:
|
Press Est. Date: |
|
|
Date: |
|
|
Sent to client (date): |
|
|
Date: |
OUT OF POCKET EXPENSE DETAILS.
| Invoice NO | Period Covered
From | Period Covered To | Amount | Payment Details Cheque No. | Payment
Details Amount | Payment Details Date |
MINIMUM SEARCH FEES / ADVANCE
DETAILS
| Rate | No. of Vac. | Total |
RECEIPT DETAILS:
- - Cheque No:
- - " Date:
- - " Amt:
INVOICE ANALYSIS – MULTIPLE
VACANCY ASSIGNMENT
(Table with Client, Client
Code, ESR No, Total Min. Fees Recd and columns for multiple vacancies)
|
VACANCY DETAILS |
CLIENT: |
Client Code: |
ESR NO: |
Total Min. Fees Recd: |
|
|
INVOICE DETAILS (GROSS) |
|||||
|
- No. |
|||||
|
- Date |
|||||
|
- Amount (Gross) |
|||||
|
- For (whose appointment?) |
|||||
|
- Service Tax |
|||||
|
ADJUSTMENTS DONE |
|||||
|
- towards Min. Search Fee |
|||||
|
- " Advance |
|||||
|
- " Progress Payment |
|||||
|
- " Credit Note |
|||||
|
- Total Amount adjusted |
|||||
|
YET TO BE ADJUSTED |
|||||
|
- towards Min. Search Fee |
|||||
|
- towards Advance |
|||||
|
- towards Progress Payment |
|||||
|
- Total yet to be adjusted |
|||||
|
NET AMOUNT PAYABLE |
|||||
|
PAYMENT DETAILS |
|||||
|
- Cheque No |
|||||
|
- " Date |
|||||
|
- " Amount |
|||||
|
- Credited date |
OES V. 2. 18-03-01
19-03-01
Venkat
Megha
Michelle
Manish
Thakur
Bedekar
Monica
(LEGEND)
|
Target Date = Date when
resumes sent? |
|
|
Most Likely Date = Date
on/by which Appt. Letter is expected to be released |
|
|
Realization Date = Date
by which final payment is expected. |
Analysing Pending Assignments
Based on a Consolidated
statement given to me yesterday by CMT, I have prepared individual
Consultant-wise statements. I enclose your statement and request you
to fill-in all the missing details and return to Monica before
lunch today. Keep a photocopy for your ready reference.
To prepare (manually) 7
individual statements from ONE consolidated statement took me 3
hours, which I could have saved, only if I knew how to use a computer! CMT
did offer me a floppy!! But it is too late for me to learn new tricks.
I also enclose some “Analysis
charts” (A / B / C).
I hope, I have asked APPLITECH
to incorporate such Analysis (output statements) in ORDER EXECUTION SYSTEM.
If not, once again, I have no one
to blame but myself.
If we have missed out, we will
get these incorporated in the next revision of OES.
It should be possible to see/view
such analysis (on the Screen) at any time – dynamically generated.
Analysis A
Tells us, who is the most
important client (in terms of total est. billing) AT THE MOMENT.
If 20% of the clients give us
80% of total “business”, then they deserve
very special attention &
SERVICE too!
Concerned Consultant /s
need to make a phone-call to such clients DAILY (- and visit once in 15
days?)
Analysis B
(QUANTITY)
Not only tells us “how many”
assignments are pending with each Consultant but it also tells us about the
QUALITY of assignments
VIZ:
Is a particular Consultant
handling
- - few, but “high billing” assignments
- - many, but “low billing” assignments
Analysis C
How sharply “focussed” or
“diffused” are the consultants?
One Consultant may be handling
20 assignments spread between
just 2 clients.
Whereas
another Consultant may be
handling 10 assignments spread amongst 8 clients. (Spreading yourself thin).
Of course, equitable distribution
of work-load amongst Consultants is an important factor.
Then there is the question of a Consultant’s
own background experience, expertise in handling assignments from a
- - particular INDUSTRY
- - " FUNCTION
- - " DESIGN. LEVEL
or even ability to “handle” a
particular HR Manager (in a particular COMPANY) based on “rapport” developed.
As for as a client is concerned,
I suppose, he would be happier
dealing with just ONE consultant of 3P for all of his Vacancies.
Imagine, that for 5 of his
Vacancies, he has to deal with 5 different Consultants!
A happy / satisfied client will
return to us again & again. It is much easier to “retain” an old
client as compared to “hooking” a new client.
But if same Consultant deals with
a given Client (solely) year-after-year, problem may arise when that
Consultant leaves us & joins a Competitor!
So a “compromise” is
inescapable.
(Signature)
cc: All Consultants
(Individually)
cc: Nirmit
CLIENT WISE (A-B-C) Analysis
of Assignments (As on 15/03/01)
(In descending order of total
est. billing) (A)
|
Client |
Total No. of Assign. |
Total Est. Billing
(Descending) |
Total Adv. recd. |
Average Billing per Search |
% of total billing |
|
Total |
101 |
CONSULTANT-WISE ANALYSIS OF
PENDING ASSIGNMENTS (As on 15/03/01) (B)
|
Consultant |
No. of Assignments on hand |
Total Est. Billing |
Total Advance Received |
Est. Billing / Appointment |
No. of Clients |
|
Highest |
Lowest |
Average |
|||
|
Venkat |
4 |
||||
|
Megha |
5 |
||||
|
Mitchelle |
15 |
||||
|
Manshi |
17 |
||||
|
Thakur |
17 |
||||
|
Bedekar |
17 |
||||
|
Monica |
25 |
||||
|
TOTAL |
100 |
CONSULTANT-WISE FOCUS (SPAN OF
ATTENTION) (C)
Q: What should be focus?
Consultant? client? Functional specialization?
|
Consultant |
Client |
Total No. of Assignments |
Grasim (12) |
Bharti Telecom (10) |
Tata ISP (15) |
Bombay Dyeing (9) |
RPG Group (14) |
121 Media (5) |
L&T Group (6) |
Motilal (7) |
Cadre (2) |
Ericsson (2) |
Pharma (3) |
|
Venkat |
4 |
||||||||||||
|
Megha |
5 |
||||||||||||
|
Mitchelle |
15 |
||||||||||||
|
Manshi |
17 |
||||||||||||
|
Thakur |
17 |
||||||||||||
|
Bedekar |
17 |
||||||||||||
|
Monica |
25 |
||||||||||||
|
Total |
100 |
17-9-93
ORDER EXECUTION MODULE.
We are basically looking at the
following 3 dimensions of each Recruitment Assignment:
A. The NUMBER-GAME (The Number
chart)
Here there is no “Time”
dimension, no mention of any “Dates”.
These are bare “STATISTICS”,
indicating:
- Historical Record
- Quantity of Effort Put-in.
B. The TIME-FRAME (The Gantt
chart)
The spread of “effort” over what
period of time?
Indicates how long our
“resources” were tied-up in execution of each assignment.
C. The REWARD (The
Account/Finance Scenario)
(a). Estimated Billing
(NO. of vacancies X 1.5 / 2.0 /
3.0 months of Salaries – estimated)
- Advances / Retainers
(Amounts & Dates)
- Progress Payments
(Amounts & Dates)
- Final Invoices
(Amounts & Dates)
- Out of Pocket Expenses
(Amounts & Dates)
(e). Payments received So far
(incl. adjusted Advance /
Progress Payments)
$$\frac{\text{e}}{\text{a}} \%
\quad \text{Payment Recd So far} \quad \% \quad [\text{Reward Rate}]$$
Estimated Billing
THE REWARD (C)
|
Assignment |
Estimated Billing (a) |
Payment Recd So far (e) |
Realization or Reward Rate
(e/a) % |
This will bring-out finally (or
at each stage of review – which should be every month, automatically by the Computer
Software),
- What are we realising as compared to what we
thought was REALISABLE (i.e. Estimated Billing).
This should help-us
- decide how long will it take before 100% amount
gets realised
- decide whether maximum realizable is 60% – 70% –
80% – 90% or what
- decide WHEN to “call it a day” and QUIT /
ABANDON an assignment
- decide WHERE to put in our efforts
All these analysis /
statements must be made a part & parcel of our “ORDER EXECUTION
SYSTEM” (our own internal MIS),
So that,
with respect to each &
every assignment, we KNOW, at any given point of time (or at the end
of each month),
WHERE DO WE STAND?
Without such a Computerised,
transaction-driven system, we would soon get swamped / lost.
Our System should automatically
update all statements / tabulations, the moment a “transaction” is
entered into the System. Eventually, all of these should result into simple /
readable graphs / bar-charts / pie-charts for each assignment and
for all assignments put together.
17-9-93
ORDER EXECUTION MODULE
The “NUMBER” CHART (A)
(Statistics)
(Forget what happened when)
Client: (Field) Position
As On: (Field)
(Table structure for The Number
Chart)
| Sl. No. | Position | Vac. |
Appli | The Number of Short-listed | Attended | Found OK (Final) | Appt. | Bal.
|
ORDER EXECUTION MODULE
TIME-FRAME (B)
GANTT CHART OF RECRUITMENT
PROCESS
|
Assignment |
No. |
Position |
No. of Vac. |
Progress Milestones |
|||||
|
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
April |
May |
June |
||||
|
Wk Wk Wk |
|||||||||
|
AR |
SL |
I |
AL |
This is just an example.
Altogether we have
- 11 Client Activities
- 10 3P Activities
- 5 Candidate "
- All of these must be covered by GANTT CHART.
(See enclosed sheet)
AR = Advt. Released
SL = Short-list sent
I = Interview Held
AL = Appointment Letter Issued.
2-9-93
Nirmit
14/6/99
CLIENT WISE ANALYSIS
|
Tells us |
||
|
1. Descending Order of Value |
Who is our - most "Valuable"
client - Least " |
|
|
2. Descending Order of
Number (of Vacancies) |
Who gives us - most VOLUME
effort - Least " |
|
|
3. Ave. Value / Vacancy
(Descending order) |
Who gives us - highest average
value (for a given effort) - lowest average value |
|
|
4. Highest Value / Lowest
Value |
Spread |
**** |
|
**** |
Consultant vs. Designation
Client vs. Designation
Client vs. Function
Design vs. Function
CONSULTANT-WISE ANALYSIS
- % of total outstanding (i.e. current)
assignments
- - Value wise & Volume (No. of Vac) wise
- - "who has got "how much backlog?
- Overload / Underload situations
- Who should take on the next
"shopping-basket"? (Ultimately this decision should be "automatic"
once all "industries" are distributed amongst existing Clients)
- Comparison of "consultant-wise"
month-end backlogs will tell us whether a particular consultant's backlog
is rising / falling continuously month after month e.g.
(Graph showing Month-end Order
Backlog (in Rs. lakh or No. of Vacancy) on the Y-axis and Months (June to Jan)
on the X-axis)
Consultant: XYZ
(A) - - - - - - Rising
(B) - - - - - - Status-Quo
(C) - - - - - - Declining
Such a graph would alert us to "Undesirable"
trends (e.g. steady or declining backlog)
- If month-end backlog is rapidly rising for 3/4
months in a row,
- - is it despite a good/healthy order execution
(i.e. billing) each month?
- Then it is obvious that the "demand"
from that industry (for that Consultant) is "booming" & we
need to hire one more consultant for that industry to share that load.
- OR
- - is it because of poor billing? (very poor
order execution)
POSITION-WISE ANALYSIS
For Position of
|
Order Backlog AS ON |
MD |
CEO President |
V.P |
GM DGM |
Manager |
|
14-6-99 |
(Table showing Consultant-wise
data)
|
Value |
No. of Vacancies |
|||||
|
Individual |
Cumu. |
% of Total |
Indi. |
Cumu. |
% of Total |
|
|
Ketki |
18.52 |
18.52 |
18.76 |
13 |
13 |
13.98 (14) |
|
Maya |
7.40 |
25.92 |
7.5 |
5 |
18 |
5.37 |
|
Sengupta |
21.26 |
47.18 |
21.54 |
16 |
34 |
17.2 |
|
Sheetal |
6.38 |
53.56 |
6.46 |
9 |
43 |
9.67 |
|
Suchitra |
7.10 |
60.66 |
7.19 |
5 |
48 |
5.37 |
|
Thakur |
38.02 |
98.68 |
38.53 |
45 |
93 |
48.38 |
|
98.68 |
93 |
|||||
|
Nirmit |
40.30 |
138.98 |
9 |
102 |
(Handwritten note at the top
right: Re in $\uparrow$ ing order of Av. Fee Value , Total Vacancies , other
columns same)
CLIENT-WISE ANALYSIS OF
PENDING ORDERS.
|
Client |
No. of Vac. |
Total Fee Value (Est.) |
Ave. Fee per Vacancy |
Highest |
Lowest |
|
Domino Pizza |
1 |
1.70 |
1.7 |
- |
- |
|
Pidilite |
7 |
7.15 |
1.02 |
1.33 |
0.59 |
|
VAM |
4 |
8.0 |
2.0 |
- |
- |
|
FINOLEX (Maya) |
4 |
5.8 |
1.45 |
1.6 |
1.4 |
|
aware Polyester |
1 |
1.6 |
1.6 |
- |
- |
|
Baxter India |
1 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
- |
- |
|
Cadilla (Sengupta) |
13 |
16.66 |
1.28 |
3.0 |
0.58 |
|
" (Sheetal) |
9 |
6.38 |
0.71 |
1.33 |
0.58 |
|
" (Combined) |
22 |
23.04 |
1.04 |
3.0 |
0.58 |
|
FINOLEX (Suchitra) |
4 |
6.4 |
1.6 |
1.6 |
1.6 |
|
L&T Deere. |
1 |
0.70 |
- |
- |
- |
|
Ashima |
3 |
3.90 |
1.3 |
1.3 |
1.30 |
|
Backbone Projects |
2 |
1.20 |
0.6 |
0.70 |
0.50 |
|
Johnson & Johnson |
2 |
1.70 |
0.85 |
1.0 |
0.70 |
|
Prism Cement |
2 |
2.60 |
1.30 |
1.6 |
1.0 |
|
Simon India |
24 |
11.62 |
0.48 |
0.75 |
0.187 |
|
Tata Honeywell |
2 |
1.08 |
0.54 |
0.58 |
0.50 |
|
Wipro Acer |
1 |
1.80 |
1.8 |
- |
- |
|
SVC Superchem |
1 |
1.60 |
1.6 |
- |
- |
|
Value (Rs.L) |
No. of Vacancies |
Ave. Value / Vac (Rs.L) |
Range (Rs.L) |
||||
|
Individual |
% of Total Value (%) |
Individual NO |
% of Total |
Highest |
Lowest |
||
|
Ketki |
18.52 |
18.76 |
13 |
13.98 |
1.42 |
2.0 |
0.59 |
|
Maya |
7.4 |
7.5 |
5 |
5.37 |
1.48 |
1.6 |
1.4 |
|
Sengupta |
21.26 |
21.54 |
16 |
17.2 |
1.33 |
3.0 |
0.58 |
|
Sheetal |
6.38 |
6.46 |
9 |
9.67 |
0.70 |
1.33 |
0.58 |
|
Suchitra |
7.10 |
7.19 |
5 |
5.37 |
1.42 |
1.60 |
0.70 |
|
Thakur |
38.02 |
38.53 |
45 |
48.38 |
0.84 |
4.0 |
0.18 |
|
Total |
98.68 |
100% |
93 |
100% |
Re-Arrange in descending order
of
- Total Individual Value
- Total Indi. Vacancies
- Rest of Columns remaining same.
CONSULTANT WISE ANALYSIS OF
PENDING ORDERS
AS ON 14 – 6 – 1999.
ORDER EXECUTION MODULE.
Pending Order Analysis –
Client Wise.
A. Client Vs. Designation/Post
to be filled
|
Post To be Filled → Client
Name ↓ |
MD CEO |
President VP |
GM DGM |
MGR |
etc. |
B. Client Vs. Function (for
which executive reqd)
|
Function → Client Name ↓ |
Sales |
Mktg |
Mfg Production |
R&D |
HR |
etc. |
C. Descending Order of Value
(Prof Fees) Wise
|
Client Name |
CURRENT No. of Pending
Vacancies |
Value of Pending Vacancies |
Executed So far during this
year No. of Vac. filled |
Prof. Fees realised |
OOP Exp |
Ave/Vacancy Prof Fees |
OOP Exp. |
Deduction:
- Who are our - most valuable clients?
- - Least " "
ORDER EXECUTION MODULE
Pending Order Analysis –
Consultant Wise
A. Consultant Vs. Designation
|
Post to be Filled →
Consultant Name ↓ |
MD CEO |
President VP |
GM |
Mgr → etc |
B. Consultant wise Details
|
consultant: ABC |
Position As On: - - - - - - |
||||||
|
client Name |
Position To be Filled |
Gross Ann. Gross offered |
Our Terms |
No. of Vac. |
Our Est. Billing |
Start Date |
End Date |
Now since sales targets have been
Analysed, we could implement new graphs.
(Handwritten date: 2/9/99)
PJP
- Good beginning
- “Sales & Collection” Cumulative graphs
should also have a “Target” line so that everybody is aware of what is
the “backlog” to be covered up.
Performance Measurement of
Consultants
- Next to evolve “Order Booking” (both in No. of
Vacancies & “Value”.
- - monthly as well as Cumulative.
- - for cum. there should be “target” line.
- next
- All 4 graphs broken up “Consultant” wise.
next (Performance measurement
of Data input dept.)
- monthly “arrival of resumes” (& Cum. too)
- - electronically
- - by post (typical)
Performance measurement of
nearly 15/20 Data Entry staff
- monthly “Scanning (OCR/Text) / Module 1” of
typed resumes
- monthly “Inputting into Module 1” of electronic
resumes.
For this, Cyril has already
built-into Module 1 automatic features. This is “Operator-wise” so only
totalling & converting into graph is to be done manually.
Pl. discuss with Sajida & fix
monthly date on which, these too must be displayed as screen-savers.
(Signature)
23/8/99.
PENDING ORDER ANALYSIS (AS ON
15-6-99) – CLIENT WISE
|
CLIENT |
DESIG Director |
CEO-CZO |
Sr. VP/VP Controller |
GM-DGM Add. Head |
Sr. Manager Sec. Head |
Regional Manager |
Manager |
Asst. MGR/Executive |
Engineer |
Misc |
Total |
|
|
1 |
Air Starch |
1 |
1 |
|||||||||
|
2 |
Ashima |
3 |
3 |
|||||||||
|
3 |
Backbone Project |
1 |
1 |
|||||||||
|
4 |
Baxter India |
1 |
2 (CA) |
1 |
||||||||
|
5 |
Cadila |
8 |
1 |
3 |
2 (CA) |
15 |
||||||
|
6 |
Domino Pizza |
1 |
1 |
|||||||||
|
7 |
Enpro |
1 |
||||||||||
|
8 |
FAG |
2 |
2 |
|||||||||
|
9 |
Finolex Cable |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
5 |
||||||
|
10 |
Finolex ESSEN |
2 |
2 |
|||||||||
|
11 |
Finolex Industries |
4 |
4 |
|||||||||
|
12 |
Garware Polyester |
2 |
2 |
|||||||||
|
13 |
Johnson & Johnson |
1 |
2 |
|||||||||
|
14 |
KIA |
1 |
1 |
|||||||||
|
15 |
Kilburn Engineering |
1 |
1 |
|||||||||
|
16 |
Kirloskar AAF |
1 |
||||||||||
|
17 |
L&T Deere |
1 |
1 |
|||||||||
|
18 |
Peermonics |
3 |
6 |
|||||||||
|
19 |
Pidilite |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
|||||||
|
20 |
Prism Cement |
2 |
2 |
|||||||||
|
21 |
Searle |
14 |
2 |
|||||||||
|
22 |
Simon India |
14 |
2 |
|||||||||
|
23 |
SVC Superchem |
1 |
||||||||||
|
24 |
Tata Honeywell |
1 |
2 |
|||||||||
|
25 |
Thomas Cook |
2 |
2 |
|||||||||
|
26 |
United Phosphorous |
5 |
5 |
|||||||||
|
27 |
VAM |
4 |
4 |
|||||||||
|
28 |
WIPRO ACER |
1 |
1 |
|||||||||
|
... |
||||||||||||
|
Total |
10 |
2 |
14 |
22 |
1 |
1 |
13 |
2 |
16 |
2 |
83 $\ddagger$ |
$\ddagger$ Excludes
assignments being handled directly by NIRMIT
PENDING ORDER ANALYSIS (AS ON
15-6-99) – CONSULTANT WISE
|
CONSULTANT |
Designation ↓ |
Director |
CEO/CIO |
Sr. VP/VP Controller |
GM/DGM AGM/Head |
Sr. Manager Sec. Head |
Regional Mgr. |
Manager |
Acct. MGR/ Exec. |
Engineer |
Misc |
Total |
|
KETKI |
8 |
2 |
3 |
13 |
||||||||
|
Maya |
1 |
3 |
1 |
5 |
||||||||
|
Nirmit |
8 |
1 |
9 |
|||||||||
|
Sengupta |
2 |
7 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
16 |
||||||
|
Sheetal |
2 |
5 |
2 |
9 |
||||||||
|
Suchitra |
4 |
1 |
5 |
|||||||||
|
Thakoor |
1 |
4 |
5 |
10 |
1 |
7 |
16 |
45 |
||||
|
Total |
9 |
2 |
15 |
23 |
11 |
1 |
20 |
2 |
16 |
2 |
102 |
OES. [BUSINESS-RULES FOR
ADJUSTMENT OF ADVANCE-AMOUNT (MINIMUM SEARCH FEES) FROM FINAL INVOICES
(INDEPENDENTLY RAISED)]
08/02/02
|
No. of Vac in SON ↓ |
No. of Candidates actually
appointed by client. → |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
1 |
Entire Adv. Amt. forfeited / No
refund No final Invoice? Force-closure? |
Normal closure Full Adv. Amt.
to be adjusted from Final Invoice of $1^{\text{st}}$ appt. |
Normal closure Full Adv. Amt.
to be adjusted from Final Invoice of $1^{\text{st}}$ appt. No Adv. Amt. to be
adj. from final invoice of $2^{\text{nd}}$ appt. No Adv. Amt. left to be adj.
from final invoice of $3^{\text{rd}}$ person |
Normal closure Full Adv. Amt.
to be adjusted from Final Invoice of $1^{\text{st}}$ appt. No Adv. Amt. to be
adj. from final invoice of $2^{\text{nd}} \& 3^{\text{rd}}$ appointers |
Continue Logic (Business Rule) |
|
2 |
Force closure Only 50% of Adv.
Amt. to be adjusted from Final Invoice of $1^{\text{st}}$ appointee Bal. 50%
of Adv. Amt. to be forfeited |
Normal closure 50% of Adv. Amt.
to be adjusted from Final Invoices of each candidate No Adv. Amt. left to be
adj. from final invoice of $3^{\text{rd}}$ person |
Normal closure To adjust 50% of
Adv. Amt. from Final Invoices of each of the first two appointees No Adv.
Amt. left to be adj. from final invoice of $3^{\text{rd}}$ person |
Continue Logic (Business Rule) |
|
|
3 |
Forced closure only 33% of Adv.
Amt. adjusted fr. Final Invoice of $1^{\text{st}}$ Candi. 66% of Adv. Amt. to
be forfeited. |
Forced closure 33% of Adv. Amt.
to be adj. from final Inv. of both (total 66%) Bal. 33% of Adv. Amt. to be
forfeited. |
Normal closure 33% of Adv. Amt.
to be adj. from Final Inv. of each candidate. |
Normal closure No Adv. Amt.
left balance; so final Inv. of $4^{\text{th}}$ person will have no
adjustment. (Full = Net) Normal closure |
|
|
4 |
cc: Nirmit
cc: Sanjeev
cc: All Consultants
cc: Vinay – Admn. H.R.
Pl discuss whether this logic is
OK.
Then decide (in a joint meeting)
whether we should. Convey this (logic) to Applitech to incorporate in OES (-and
make it quite complex?).
Client Name:
Client Code:
OES V 2.0
Shopping Basket History
|
Sl No. |
Shop basket NO / date |
Proposal No / date |
SON date |
Terms Invoice value |
Position Name (Designation) |
Consultant Responsible |
|
12% 150,000 |
||||||
24/08/01
Venkat
Client Janam Kundli (COES)
Saleem is developing 6/7 screens
for "Corporate Database". To begin with, we will transfer into this
database, data about 5.5 lakh registered Companies listed in a CD released by
DCA (Dept of Company Affairs). Athi’s friend managed to crack the code and Athi
is in the process of installing this database in both the offices. Once
installed in Oracle or MS ACCESS, our Consultants would be able to search/list
Companies
City wise
Industry wise
Products/Services wise
Of course, any Company can be
found by its “NAME”.
The data contained in the CD,
gives Content/Info for each company & Industry to which it
belongs + products/services that it manufactures/provides.
The 6/7 Screens of Corporate
Database which Saleem is developing will be initially accessible
within our office. After testing its usefulness for a few months, I propose to
upload, some of these screens onto our website. Shopping Basket History
will be one of these screens.
Idea is to give to each of our
Corporate Client, a unique
- - Login name
- - Password
using which, the authorised HR
Manager (of a particular Client Company) would be able to access his
Company’s “PERSONAL PAGE” on our website, where he can see all kind of HISTORICAL
DATA about his company’s DEALINGS/RELATIONSHIP with 3P,
irrespective of, whether those “dealings” were “online” or “offline”.
“Shopping Basket History”
is one such record.
Other (Historical) records,
contemplated are:
Job Advt. Posting History
Resume-Search History
(In future, we plan to introduce “registration”
of a Corporate, before he can conduct a resume-search). He would be required to
log-in before he can conduct a resume-search.
“Resumes Forwarded” History
against each Job Advt.
(Thru Resume Forwarding Service)
“Candidate Alerts (Sent)” History
(This could be part of Job-Advt.
Posting-History)
Saleem is in the process
of designing all these screens.
As far as “Shopping Basket
History” Screen is concerned, the ideal thing would be to simply pick it up
from OES & upload on the website.
I have drawn such a screen, at
the beginning of this note. Pl. ask Saleem to join-in when you discuss this
issue with Tapan.
cc: Saleem.
24/08/01
Saleem These screens of “Corporate
Database” are picked-up from Order Exec. System (OES). The Corpo
database screens which you are developing will be many (maybe 6 or 7) but
these/following 3 Screens must be identical so that you are able to “migrate”
the data in both direction, without any problems. That is, Janam Kundali for
ADITYA BIRLA
Print Date: 24/08/1
Client Details:
| Client Name: | ADITYA BIRLA |
Branch: | | THREE P CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD Wrong! PRESIDENT / EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
|
| Contact Person: | Dr Santrupt
Mishra | Designation: | | 2047967 |
| Address: | Industry House 1st
Floor Nariman Point MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA INDIA - 400021 | Email: | | 9820011205
|
| | | Phone: | | |
| | | Fax: | | |
| | | Mobile: | | |
| Source of Information: |
PERSONAL REFERENCE
Legal Company Details:
| Legal Company Name: | GRASIM
INDUSTRIES LIMITED TEXTILES | Parent Group Name: | ADITYA BIRLA GROUP |
| Industry Name: | | Designation:
| MANAGER |
| Contact Person: | Mr
Chandrashekhar Chavan | Web Site: | www.adityabirla.com |
| Address: | Industry House
Churchgate Reclamation Churchgate MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA INDIA - 400 021 | Email:
| shchavan@adityabirla.com |
| | | Phone: | 022-2870534 |
| | | Fax: | |
| | | Mobile: | |
what is this?
Order / Shopping Basket Executed
History
| Inquiry No. | Inquiry Date |
Consultant | Proposal No. | Proposal Date | SON | Proposal Type | Terms |
Ideal arrangement should be as
per enclosed page.
Tapan (Applitech) says, these
Columns cannot be combined (in order to save space) since data is picked-up
from different “tables”! So, if we want to upload this screen on our website,
we are stuck with this arrangement!!
To
CONSULTANTS
July 12, 2001
Collection Targets
OES V.2.
I enclose
- - a tabulation
- - a graphical presentation
This would help us in drawing-up
a strategy when we meet Saturday afternoon.
These would certainly help you to
monitor your “achievements” as the year progresses.
As far as the 12 month
Tabulation is concerned, Maggi has already created the FORMAT
on her computer – you could enter your personal data in this format &
monitor.
If you wish, Athi/Saleem
can help you to create your own personalized “SCREEN-SAVER” as far as
the graph is concerned – with multi-colour power-point presentation so you are
reminded automatically!
Regards
(Signature)
CONSULTANT: VENKAT
YEAR: 2001-2002
COLLECTION
(Graph: Y-axis is Collection
amount in lakhs, X-axis is Months A-M)
- Original Target (Dotted Line): Reaching 42
at M.
- Actual (Solid Line): Shows collection
amounts up to J (7.8).
- $1^{\text{st}}$ Q (Blue Line)
- $2^{\text{nd}}$ Q REVISED TARGET (Red Line):
Starts from Actual at J (7.8), reaching 21 at S (September).
July 7, 2001
|
1ST QTR Collection (Rs. L) |
Target |
Actual |
Backlog |
COMMITMENT CHART OF - - - V
E N K A T - - - |
2nd Q Target (Incl.
Backlog) |
July |
Aug |
Sept |
|
9,00,000 |
4,51,195 |
5,98,805 |
BY (Target Date)
$\rightarrow$ |
16,48,805 |
6,00,000 |
6,00,000 |
48,805 |
Target Date Columns: 7, 8,
9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20.
|
Sl No. |
This is what I will do
(ACTIVITY) |
BY (Target Date) → |
What will happen then
(EVENT-RESULT) |
|
RAM KUMAR - SICAL - ADANI Rpt. |
X (8) |
IF HE IS INTERESTED THEN PUT
ACC. IN ARIERE |
|
|
S.S. JHA - IDBI - G.H.R. |
X (9) |
EVALUATE GET RESUME $\&$
FORWARD GHR |
|
|
CH. MUR. S. SINGH - ADANI Rpt. |
X (10) |
RESUME SENT TO ADMN. |
|
|
R.J. CHAND - SBI - G.H.R. |
X (11) |
IF INTERESTED FORWARD TO GHR |
|
|
SAPTENT |
X (12) |
||
|
SANTV DESAI S.R. MALLETSWARM |
X (13) |
||
|
BASE PAYMENT |
X (7) X (10) |
EVENT CLOSURE 5,00,000 2,25,000 |
|
|
RANESH SOOR - INDORAMA - GRASIM |
X (10) |
IF INTERESTED FORWARD TO BIRLA |
|
|
LINE UP INTERVIEWS FOR RUPAM |
X (11) |
||
|
MEET GSP MERRILL LYNCH |
X (12) |
||
|
CONTACT PROP SAL |
X (13) |
||
|
FOLLOW UP WITH YOGI SEERAM ON |
X (14) |
||
|
OES/MODULE 1 |
|||
|
FOLLOW UP WITH SANGEETA ON |
X (11) |
||
|
FOLLOW UP WITH. ASHAPURA GRP. |
X (12) |
1,00,000 |
|
|
PRODUCT MGR. - ADITYA BIRLA PR. |
X (14) X (15) |
SEND RESUMES |
|
July 7, 2001
|
1ST QTR Collection (Rs. L) |
Target |
Actual |
Backlog |
COMMITMENT CHART OF - - - V
E N K A T - - - |
2nd Q Target (Incl.
Backlog) |
July |
Aug |
Sept |
|
9,00,000 |
4,51,195 |
5,98,805 |
BY (Target Date)
$\rightarrow$ |
16,48,805 |
6,00,000 |
6,00,000 |
4,48,805 |
Target Date Columns: 7, 8,
9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20.
|
Sl No. |
This is what I will do
(ACTIVITY) |
BY (Target Date) → |
What will happen then
(EVENT-RESULT) |
|
HAND OVER J.R. TO NIRAM |
X (15) |
||
|
HEAD HUNT FOR ASHAPURA (GH) |
X (17) X (18) |
||
|
POST ACROSS CANDIDATES FOR GM |
X (18) X (19) |
||
QUO-VADIS?
Consultant: VENKAT
|
Q. |
MONTH |
COLLECTION |
MONTH-END STATUS |
|||||
|
Target |
Actual (B) |
Variance |
Cumulative Invoicing (A) |
Outstanding (A) - (B) |
Pending Assignments |
|||
|
Mon. |
Cumu. |
Mon. |
Cumu. |
Mon. |
Cumu. |
No. of Vacancies |
||
|
April |
3.5 |
|||||||
|
10.5 |
May |
3.5 |
3.5 |
|||||
|
1 |
June |
3.5 |
10.5 |
4.5 |
-6.0 |
6 |
||
|
July |
3.25 |
14.0 |
3.25 |
7.75 |
6.25 |
6.75 |
||
|
10.5 |
2 |
Aug |
3.5 |
17.5 |
7.0 |
4.75 |
2.25 |
|
|
Sept |
3.5 |
21.0 |
3.0 |
17.75 |
3.25 |
|||
|
10.5 |
Oct |
3.5 |
24.5 |
3.5 |
21 |
3.5 |
||
|
3 |
Nov |
3.5 |
28.0 |
|||||
|
Dec |
3.5 |
31.5 |
||||||
|
Jan |
3.5 |
35.0 |
||||||
|
10.5 |
4 |
Feb |
3.5 |
38.5 |
||||
|
Mar. |
3.5 |
42.0 |
||||||
|
TOTAL |
42 |
42 |
- Backlog of 3.5/lack of invoicing
(Handwritten note at bottom left)
- 7 (3,00,000) (Written in 'Total estimated
billing' column for Aug)
COMPILATION OF BASIC DATA FOR
ENTERING / TESTING ORDER EXECUTION SYSTEM
| Sr. No. | Client Company |
Consultant Handling | POSITION DETAILS | | | ASSIGNMENT DETAILS TERMS DETAILS
Position Name | Function |
Designatory Level | Sr. B. No. | If Online | If Offline | Proposal Date |
Accepted Date | Target Complete Date | % Advance (If So) | Amt. (If So) |
Advance Esti. Billing (Rs) (Amt (CRS)) |
Sheetal
- Team of APPLITECH should be reaching our
office any day soon, to install & test & handover the ORDER
EXECUTION SYSTEM.
- They plan to complete installation/testing/handover
in 3 days and another 2 days for training of our staff.
- It is therefore essential that we are ready in
all respects (HW/SW/Data) BEFORE they arrive. This assumes critical
importance in view of the fact that:
- This system will cost us close to Rs. 10 Lakhs
(excluding HW).
- Every "extra" day the team spends here
will cost us Rs. 3000/- /day (max. Rs. 9000/- /day for 3 people).
- Whereas Reena & Athi will take care of HW/SW
- CMT will take care of coordination with
Anagha & Mr. Negle.
You have to be responsible for
compiling "data" about all of our current "executive-search
assignments" as "per format shown above." This
(Compilation) must get ready by tomorrow evening, at the latest. By a
copy of this note, I am requesting all consultants, to hand-over to you, their
respective data in some format, before lunch tomorrow. Please give me 2
copies of Compilation (preferably a computer print-out) by tomorrow
evening.
cc: Mr. Negle
cc: Reena - Athi.
cc: All Consultants. W.I.W.
cc: Nirmit
Regards
(Signature/Initials)
16/03/01
OES V 2.0.
27-5-97
Nirmit
Thakoor
Sujata (Checked/Ticked)
Urmila
Development of Software for
Interview Follow-Up
With growing business, there is
an urgent need to develop a Software to keep track of the Interviews'
schedules/confirmations and outcome (feedback).
For this purpose, I enclose a SYSTEM-DESIGN.
This is by no means,
comprehensive. It is only a beginning. We will need to modify as we go
along - as we grow. We cannot wait to evolve THE PERFECT SYSTEM. A beginning
- even if crude - must be made.
Pl. study enclosed pages
carefully and jot-down your comments - observations - suggestions. I
would like to discuss this thoroughly in our next monday meeting with a
view to finalise and to handover to a programmer.
Regards
(Signature/Initials)
INTERVIEW FOLLOW-UP MODULE
27-5-97
|
Sr. No. |
SCREEN NAME |
WHAT DOES IT SHOW? |
Who Enters? |
When? |
|
1 |
PRIMARY SCREEN |
ESR Details |
concerned Consultant |
As & when ESR recd. |
|
2 |
INTERVIEW DATA INPUT SCREEN |
Interview-Schedule Details. |
" |
As soon as client advises
interview date/names On-time over telephone |
|
3 |
GOOD MORNING |
Interview-Schedule - Candidate
Confirmation - Summary - Consultant wise - Datewise - Today |
" |
As soon as confirmation recd
(daily) + As soon as client feedback recd (daily) |
|
4 |
CLIENT SUMMARY |
List & outcome of all
candidates ever Interviewed by any given client (From the beginning) arranged
chronologically continuously |
Nobody. This screen gets
generated automatically & continuously |
- |
|
5 |
CANDIDATE-SUMMARY |
List all interviews ever
attended by any given Candidate with any client (in chronological order) |
Nobody. This screen gets
generated automatically & continuously |
- |
|
6 |
INTERVIEW-CALL LETTER |
Interview details |
No body. This letter gets auto
generated from Screen #2 |
- |
|
Sr. No. |
SCREEN NAME |
What does it show? |
Who enters? |
When? |
|
7 |
INTERVIEW FEEDBACK with
covering letter |
Feedback on each &
every candidate interviewed by a client for a given position |
concerned Consultant |
As soon as interview date is
over |
INTERVIEW FOLLOW-UP 1
PRIMARY SCREEN
Serial No: (Auto)
CLIENT DATA:
- Client Name:
- " Code: (Auto. from HHSP)
- Contact Exec:
- " Phone (Off)
- " " (Resi)
ASSIGNMENT DATA:
- ESR Date: {Auto-generated UNIQUE
- ESR No: {SERIAL NUMBER}
- Ref: $\square$ ORAL $\square$ LETTER
$\square$ FAX $\square$
- Mode: A / D / S
- Terms: PF @ Superional fees.
- MF @ Minimum fees.
- Position:
- Vacancy's:
- Posting Location:
CONSULTANT:
DATE:
EXECUTION SCHEDULE
|
ACTIVITY |
Target Date |
Actual Date |
Variance. |
|
Send Judgement Report |
|||
|
Send one-line Statement |
|||
|
" Bio-Data |
|||
|
Arrange Prelim. Interviews |
|||
|
" Final " |
|||
|
Get Appt. letter Issued |
|||
|
Any other Comment |
INTERVIEW FOLLOW-UP 2
INTERVIEW DATA INPUT SCREEN
|
# 1 |
# 2 |
|
|
Client Name: |
( KEY ENTRY |
) |
|
ESR NO: |
( " |
" ) |
|
Date: |
( " |
" ) |
|
ESR Position: |
( " |
" ) |
|
Interview Date: |
( " |
" ) |
|
Venue: |
( " |
" ) |
|
Travel Reimbursement: |
( " |
" ) |
|
Contact Exec: |
( " |
" ) |
CANDIDATES TO BE CALLED FOR
INTERVIEW AS PER CLIENT INSTRUCTION
|
Candidate Name |
PEN |
Current Company |
Phone (R) |
(O) |
Interview Date |
Interview Time |
|
|
$\to$ |
Key Entry |
By default Auto from HHSP |
" |
" |
" |
Key Entry |
Repeated three times for three
different candidates:
- Candidate Name
- PEN
- Current Company
- Phone (R)
- (O)
- Interview Time
|
Entered By (Consultant) |
||
|
Entered on (Date) |
GOOD MORNING
|
Type Consultant Name |
I want to see Summary of
interviews organised for |
|
|
$\square$ All Clients / All
days $\square$ My clients / Today $\square$ My clients / For
DATE |
Candidate Details
|
Interview Date / Time |
Name |
PEN |
Currently with |
Phone No |
If Confirmed |
|
Auto $ from INTERVIEW DATA
INPUT SCREEN #2 |
Auto $ from INTERVIEW DATA
INPUT SCREEN #2 |
Auto $ from HHSP Screens |
Auto $ from HHSP Screens |
KEY ENTRY $ " |
Client Details
|
Name |
ESR Position |
Contact Person Name |
Phone |
Interview Feedback |
|
Auto $ from INTERVIEW DATA
INPUT SCREEN #2 |
Auto $ from INTERVIEW DATA
INPUT SCREEN #2 |
Auto $ from PRIMARY SCREEN
#1 |
Auto $ from PRIMARY SCREEN
#1 |
KEY ENTRY $ " |
CLIENT - SUMMARY CHRONOLOGICAL
- CLIENT NAME:
- CODE:
- CONTACT Exec:
- PHONE NO:
|
Date of Interview |
Candidate Name |
PEN |
Interviewed for Which
Position |
Mode |
ESR NO / Date |
Feedback |
|
Auto from Screen #2 |
Auto from Screen #2 |
Auto from Screen #2 |
Auto from ESR |
Auto from Screen #2 |
Auto from Screen #3 |
CANDIDATE SUMMARY
CHRONOLOGICAL
- CANDIDATE Name: {Auto. from Screen #2}
- PEN: {Auto. from Screen #2}
- Phone (R): {Auto. from HHSP}
- (O): {Auto. from HHSP}
|
Date of Interview |
Client Company Where
Interviewed |
For Which Position? |
Feedback |
ESR NO / ESR Date |
|
Auto from Screen #2 |
Auto from Screen #2 |
Auto from Screen #2 |
Auto. from Screen #3 |
Auto from Screen #2 |
Automatically Generated
INTERVIEW CALL LETTER
(All inputs automatic from
Screen #2)
|
Candidate Name |
Date |
|
PEN |
00/00/0000 |
|
Regd. Address: |
Our Ref: |
|
ESR: |
Dear Hr/Mrs: [Surname]
We had occasion to send your
biodata to our client
[Client Name]
for the position of
[Position]
Mr. [Contact Exec. Name]
[Designation]
[Client Name]
has shown interest in meeting you
as per following details:
- Date: [_]
- Time: [_]
- Venue: [_]
- Phone: [_]
(The rest of the text is
incomplete or cut off at the bottom.)
|
Contact Exec: Name |
Date |
|
Desig |
|
|
Client Address |
Dear Sir:
Interview Feedback
We had arranged some executives
to meet you for the position of
[Position Description]
on [Date]
against your Executive Search
Request No. [_].
We would appreciate receiving
your feedback and request you to fill in the enclosed sheet and send us a
photocopy while retaining the original for your records.
If you want us to
- contact executives who did not attend
- organise "final" interviews
- follow-up with short-listed candidates
- send you any more details/resumes
please feel free to phone
undersigned.
With regards.
INTERVIEW FEEDBACK
|
Ref: |
ESR No: |
Client: [_]
Contact Person: [_]
Interview Position: [_]
Candidate: [_]
Interview Date: [_]
Phone: [_]
|
Feedback → |
[Candidate 1 Column] |
[Candidate 2 Column] |
[Candidate 3 Column] |
[Candidate 4 Column] |
|
IF DID NOT ATTEND |
||||
|
- Did he call/ask for a new
date? |
$\square$ Yes $\square$ No |
$\square$ $\square$ |
$\square$ $\square$ |
$\square$ $\square$ |
|
- Indicate fresh date, if
given |
Date [_] |
$\square$ |
$\square$ |
$\square$ |
|
IF ATTENDED |
||||
|
- Not suitable |
$\square$ |
$\square$ |
$\square$ |
$\square$ |
|
- Kept on hold |
$\square$ |
$\square$ |
$\square$ |
$\square$ |
|
- Would like to see him
again |
$\square$ |
$\square$ |
$\square$ |
$\square$ |
|
IF FOUND SUITABLE |
||||
|
- Short-listed for final
interview date |
$\square$ |
$\square$ |
$\square$ |
$\square$ |
|
- Final interview date |
[_] |
[_] |
[_] |
[_] |
|
IF APPOINTING |
||||
|
- Appt. letter will be
issued by |
[_] |
[_] |
[_] |
[_] |
|
- Expected to join by |
[_] |
[_] |
[_] |
[_] |
|
- Gross Salary (Annual)
negotiated. |
Rs. [_] L |
Rs. [_] L |
Rs. [_] L |
Rs. [_] L |
|
REMARKS |
(This file appears to be a
clipped article about "Tracking Sales" software.)
Tracking Sales
Tracker for Windows is a
user-friendly software which has been acclaimed all over the world for
improving sales productivity
SALES EXECUTIVES hate paperwork,
but all organisations are required to document the data being filled in by
them. This regular tracking of the activities of sales executives is essential
for every organisation to determine its productivity. There are other reasons
too for which tracking is important; it helps the organisation track the
necessary information about its competition. Information about key competitors,
is, for maintaining the organisation, it also helps to manage case sales
executives more the company's information about a territory; on the other hand,
it helps the organization to understand the market potential in it. It is
because of these reasons that many companies have worked out elaborate
mechanisms for reporting and monitoring. Some of them insist that their sales
forces maintain daily diaries. Others, especially in the pharmaceutical field,
where the sales force has to call a lot, ask their executives to send in their
reports through the mail.
However, despite all these
efforts, the process is a mess in many of the companies. Many times the reports
are filled in haphazardly and no one ever checks them. The problem is
compounded in organisations, which run direct marketing, telemarketing, or response
advertising. These companies spend a lot of money and effort on generating the
leads but they lack the system required to monitor or track the level of the
leads generated.
The sales management function is
much more than simply tracking; sales management function rather than an
analysis is also because of the lack of systematic methods of compiling sales
reports and analyzing them. Even with the advent of computers, the situation
has not improved because computerization is still seen as a back-end support.
However, there is a new category
of sales productivity software. There is now a need to improve their sales
productivity, which is making tracking sales easier. This software is called
Contact Management Software. The simple logic behind this software is that
organisations have a series of contacts during a sales process and all of these
need to be tracked, documented and managed. Two such software, Tracker and ACT,
are readily available in the market. Both are powerful software and can help in
streamlining sales reporting and prioritizing of information on interactions
with clients by just pressing a button.
Let us take a look at Tracker for
Windows, which has been acclaimed over the world as a user-friendly software
and has also earned the Usability Seal of Approval from the PC magazine.
Tracker for Windows was also awarded the Best Product, 94, at PC 95-The
National Computer Show. Tracker for Windows has been developed by Tracker
Software Australia and is being marketed in India by Datasoft Automation.
Datasoft (I) Limited. It has over three lakh users worldwide. Many Indian
companies have already bought and are using this software.
Tracker is a Windows contact
management application with a comprehensive set of tools for managing existing
and prospective clients and the history of the dealings with them.
[Image of software boxes]
Tracker, which has over three
lakh users worldwide, is also being used by many Indian companies.
Tracker for Windows allows one to
track every dealing with a customer, to keep a record of every phone call,
every piece of letter and every visit. Tracker consists of five main modules:
Contact Manager, Coordinator, Sales Manager, Time Manager and Indexer. Each
module is organised like a four sided index card with 15 different fields of
information. Besides, each record and 10 notepads for on-line notes are also
kept. The entire index is recorded; it is stamped with up to the second and the
time of the contact involved and the name of the person making the call. Data
from other files or programmes can also be imported in this software and also
internal merging and purging of data thus making it helpful in maintaining a
database.
Tracker for Windows also comes
with an in-built word processor and can churn out immediate response to any
request for information. It is also possible to directly link the application
with the help of a modem. Macro is an attractive feature to be automated. The
search and view capability within each Tracker multi-user database gives the
history of any business contact over a selected time span, particular time and
what is planned for the future. The time manager provides the facility to
maintain a personal diary or set a group schedule. It is flexible and powerful
in its abilities to help in organising personal and appointments and to share
this information with others in multi-user situations. It is perfect to get an
overview of the activities of every executive on daily or even on a yearly
schedule. Tracker is easy to use hence it is unlikely to encounter any
resistance from sales people using it.
The seven aims of the software
that contact management software should achieve are and follow:
Some of these are:
- Sales force: Planning and reporting sales
calls, reporting expenses, ordering, checking inventory, and order status,
managing distribution, tracking leads and managing accounts.
- Direct Marketing: Merging, creating and
maintaining lists, tracking and forwarding letters, internal mail merge,
envelopes and labels, generating postage due for literature packages and
managing literature inventory.
- Telemarketing: Merging, cleaning and
maintaining lists, tracking and forwarding leads, tracking prospects and
prompting scripts.
- Sales and Marketing Management: Providing
automated sales management reports (sales forecast, sales activity
forecast and quota), making sales territories and assigning sales
representatives, preparing sales territories, channel and product.
Any investment in contacts
management software goes a long way in improving sales productivity and allows
for control of activities of the sales force. This can mean lowered sales cost
and improved customer services.
Module 1
Website V 2.0. 1
25/8/98
SEARCH QUERY
|
If you enter this SEARCH
PARAMETER |
→ OUTPUT SCREEN/PRINTOUT
WILL DISPLAY THIS ↓ |
|
PEN |
- "Janam-kundli"
of Concerned executive including "Search parameters" chosen for
self |
|
OR |
- Image File of resume |
|
- Text " " |
|
|
NAME of executive |
- Companies to Whom we
have ever sent his resume (last 5 yrs) |
|
- Companies who has
interviewed him |
|
|
- If appointed then us then,
where, when, at what salary/designation/posting location, our invoice
No/date/Amt; Payment details |
|
|
- When last updated resume
on Internet |
|
|
(ids) |
- letters sent to him/sent to
us by him |
|
Designation |
All executives in our database
(including NON-MEMBERS) with that designation, arranged in descending
order of "AGE" (Must cover "synonym"
Designation Rings) |
|
INDUSTRY |
All executives in our database
who have specified their "Industry" as the "first-named(?)
Industry" in their self search-parameters |
|
- arranged in descending order
of age |
|
|
Must cover alternate names
of Industry & similar industries. (Synonyms) |
SEARCH QUERY
|
If you enter this SEARCH
PARAMETER |
→ OUTPUT SCREEN/PRINTOUT
WILL DISPLAY THIS ↓ |
|
FUNCTION |
All executives in our database
(incl. NON-MEMBERS?) who have specified this "function"
as the "first-named(?) function" in their Self-search
parameters, arranged in descending order of "age" Must
cover "synonymous/similar" functions |
|
EDUCATION |
All executives in our database
(incl. NON-MEMBERS) who have this Edu/Qualification arranged in descending
order of "age" Must cover Similar Qualifications (Synonyms) |
|
LANGUAGE |
All executives who can "speak"
this language, (descending order of age). |
|
PRODUCT/ SERVICE |
All executives who claim to
have exposure to this product/service |
|
List 1 Those who have mentioned
this FIRST |
|
|
2 " " " SECOND |
|
|
3 " " " THIRD. |
|
|
(+ Synonyms) |
SEARCH QUERY
|
If you enter this SEARCH
PARAMETER |
→ OUTPUT SCREEN/PRINTOUT
WILL DISPLAY THIS ↓ |
|
COMPANY NAME (CURRENT) |
All executives working in this
company. |
|
List A Those registered with us |
|
|
B NON-Members. |
|
|
Always arrange in descending
order of "designations" |
|
|
e.g.
Ch/CMD/MD/CEO/President/EVP/VP/GM/... |
|
|
CITY NAME (STATE/COUNTRY
OPTIONS) |
All executives posted in this
city |
|
List A Those registered with us |
|
|
B Non Members |
|
|
COMPANY NAME (PAST
EMPLOYMENT) |
Any executive who has ever
worked in this Company. |
|
List A Those registered with us
(Give "period" of working in that co.) |
|
|
B Non Members |
|
|
(Arrange in descending order
of designation) |
SEARCH QUERY
|
If you enter this SEARCH
PARAMETER |
→ OUTPUT SCREEN/PRINTOUT
WILL DISPLAY THIS ↓ |
|
GROSS ANNUAL SALARY |
- Year wise Lists |
|
- Arranged in ascending or
descending Salary-Slab wise (pre-define slabs at annual
differential of Rs. 25000/=) |
|
|
e.g. |
|
|
Salary slabs will be |
|
|
$0 - 25000.$ |
|
|
$25001 - 50,000$ |
|
|
$50,001 - 75,000$ |
|
|
etc. etc. |
|
|
- Frequency Distribution
Graphs. |
|
|
(Year wise/Age wise/Desig.
wise/Edu. wise) |
|
|
- Line of best-fit (Year
wise) |
|
|
( Age-wise) |
|
|
( Desig. wise) |
|
|
( Edu. wise) |
|
|
( Function wise) |
|
|
( Industry wise) |
|
|
- Gross Salary for SAME
EXECUTIVE (Same PEN) |
|
|
Growth Curve (year-wise) |
|
|
See my file on |
|
|
Value-Added Service -
Compensation Survey. |
SEARCH QUERY
|
If you enter this SEARCH
PARAMETER |
→ OUTPUT SCREEN/PRINTOUT
WILL DISPLAY THIS ↓ |
|
KNOWLEDGE/ SKILL/ ATTITUDE/
ATTRIBUTE WORDS |
- All executives, who have
entered this "word" in his self-search-parameter |
|
OR |
|
|
ANY OTHER KEYWORD/S (Which
could be any word or words) |
Any executive, in whose Resume
such word (or words) appear anywhere including in the "REMARKS/ANNOTATIONS"
which a Consultant may have entered on the resume or on any slip
attached to that resume. |
|
OR |
Of course, such "Remarks/Annotations"
would either need to be entered in the Screen by a Consultant or by a
D/E operator |
|
ANY PHRASE OR SENTENCE |
Here the query will also
produce a list of RESUMES which, do NOT list that specific
word/phrase/sentence ITSELF |
|
BUT, |
|
|
Which is linked to the starting
KNOWLEDGE-BASE created by HHSP thru TELL-ME (More than 15000
words have been categorised) |
|
|
(Reaches RIGHT NOW
URGENTLY) |
SEARCH QUERY
|
If you enter this SEARCH
PARAMETER |
→ OUTPUT SCREEN/PRINTOUT
WILL DISPLAY THIS ↓ |
|
- Sub-sequent "knowledge-base"
which will gradually evolve over a period of time thru use of Context
Catridge option or thru ARDIS Fuzzy logic. |
|
|
e.g. |
|
|
Say a query asks list of all
executives possessing "Financial Management skills" |
|
|
This phrase itself may not be
found in any of the resumes!! |
|
|
But, |
|
|
the result must show all
executives, in whose resume the following words/phrases appear: |
|
|
- IRR (Internal Rate of
Return) |
|
|
- DCF (Discounted Cash
Flow) |
|
|
- Budget |
|
|
- Working capital Management |
|
|
- Capital Budgetting |
|
|
... |
|
|
This Knowledge Base must get
ready by Dec. 1998) |
SEARCH QUERY
|
If you enter this SEARCH
PARAMETER |
OUTPUT SCREEN/PRINTOUT WILL
DISPLAY THIS |
|
FOR FRESH GRADS/ FINAL YEAR
STUDENTS |
Pl. see my notes dated |
|
- State |
|
|
- University |
|
|
- College Name |
|
|
- Branch / Discipline / Level |
|
|
- Specialisation |
|
|
- GPA/Final year marks |
These are "core"
Search parameters & therefore "Mandatory" to be
specified either by our own consultants or by Personnel Chiefs
who log into our Internet/Extranet. |
|
- Permanent Address |
|
|
- Sex |
In addition to these, any of
the other Search-parameters may be optionally added to produce a LIST
(or a short-list). |
|
- Language |
Export to Sheets
OES V 2.0. 19/07/01
NEW ORDER-BOOKING PLANNING
WORK-SHEET Consultant: [_]
INVOICE-FIGURES - NOT
"COLLECTION" FIGURES.
|
ITEM |
1st Q Target |
2nd Q Revised Target |
3rd Q Revised Target |
4th Q Revised Target |
Jan |
Feb |
Mar. |
|
Ap |
May |
June |
July |
Aug |
Sept |
Oct |
|
|
Collection Target original |
|||||||
|
Order Backlog on beginning
of month |
|||||||
|
Less (-) |
|||||||
|
Month's Invoicing Target
(Revised) |
|||||||
|
Equals (=) |
|||||||
|
Next month's expected
opening Backlog |
|||||||
|
However, |
|||||||
|
Opening Backlog for next
month has to be equal to next 3 months' targetted Invoicing |
|||||||
|
Requiring |
|||||||
|
New Orders to be booked
during the course of the Month |
|||||||
|
Actual Orders Booked |
|||||||
|
Actual Invoicing |
Export to Sheets
Order Execution 1
26/7/99
TO ALL CONSULTANTS
For sometime now, we have felt
the need to be aggressive in our marketing efforts.
It was also agreed that each one
of you should have a much more comprehensive role which extends beyond
MARKETING
- Submit Proposals / Terms
- Negotiating - Selling
- ORDER EXECUTION
- Invoicing / Follow-Up
- Collection of Outstandings
- Customer Service
This is a total job in which you
are supported by the "back-office" team consisting of
- Sajida / Nirav / Suresh / Nirmit / myself / Riya /
Judy / other office staff
But you cannot become aggressive
unless you "know" who your existing/potential Clients are!
With this in mind, we distributed
all the "industries" amongst you. These, then became your
"territories."
We also have grouped each &
every Indian Company (at least LTD. Companies) under one - or other of
these industries. So, now you have lists of "specific Cos."
which "belong" to you. You are the owner/manager of these
companies. They are your exclusive "clients". You are the
"Accounts Manager" for these Cos.
Of course, with passage of time
- more Industries will be added
- " Companies " "
- " Consultants " "
So dynamic "reshuffling"
is inevitable.
In the enclosed folder, I have
tried to "list" Who your Customers are. The lists draw upon
several "sources".
The lists prepared by
- Soma (16000 + LTD. Cos)
- KOMPASS (22000 + LTD/PVT LTD Cos)
are too big to be "printed-out"
as "hardcopies". Sajida has prepared ( / preparing) Computer-based
files/directories for these, for each of you, which you can "access"
from your own node.
Now you are your own!
You have to market
"3P" to these Companies - which "belong" to you.
You should, henceforth, send them
promotional letters/e-mails, tell them who we are and what we can do to make
their life easier.
Wherever e-mail address is
available, only e-mails must be sent. This is a very
fast/efficient/cheap method.
Wherever available, Sajida, will
mention e-mail addresses in YOUR client database.
Wherever not available, request
Judy to phone-up those Companies and request for their e-mail address by
Saying, "We want to send an invitation to your HR/Personnel Manager.
Can we have his name/designation/e-mail address?"
Remember to send each email
(or even Book Post letter) addressed to an INDIVIDUAL - by his/her NAME! This
is a MUST!
In the ultimate analysis, a human
being is your client - not a company. You cannot "talk" to
a company nor invite it for dinner!
You must establish a One-to-one
personal relationship with who-so-ever happens to be in charge of
recruitment in each client-company.
Our "Mail-king"
software creates personalised salutations (e.g. Dear Mr.
Patil/Dear Ms. Gupta etc) as far as e-mails are concerned.
"Book-Post"
letters must not be signed. If signed, these become FIRST
CLASS MAIL and require higher postage.
Of course, if you are sending-out
"Circulars" to Several hundred companies and, therefore
resort to BOOK-POST/PRINTED letters, you may have to enter by hand
Dear _ _ _ _ _ _
but do not "sign"
at the bottom! Postal authorities may still treat these as "Printed
Circulars" & accept Rs. 2 stamp.
If the quantity (of mailers) is under
100, you may choose to computer-print with individual salutation and
sign at the bottom.
Whereas each one of you will
write to your own Clients, when it Comes to sending-out any general
Circular to all 16000/22-158 Cos - belonging to all 151 industries - is
Concerned, I will do so. Mostly these will be to keep them informed about
- Developments in HR (HR Update)
- our website developments.
However, each one of you may
want to write to A, B or C Industry-clients, how many suitable
"Candidates" you have in your database in which that client-company
may be interested.
In the last 6 months, I
have sent-out several Circulars. These
|
Circular |
Target Group |
How Sent |
|
Can You Spare 5 minutes |
175 Corp. Job advertisers. |
e-mail |
|
PIN, PAN, PEN |
Exec. who sent their Resumes
by e-mail (788 + 2063) |
" |
|
Six Months to Go |
Candidates whose typed
resumes had email add. (1237) |
" |
|
- Cup of Joy |
~ 170 Cybercafes |
e-mail + Book Post |
|
- Eightfold Advantage |
51818 individuals whose
email add. we have |
e-mail |
|
- sharing a Jackpot (under
process) |
||
|
A Free Lunch? |
3168 Pvt. Ltd. Co's |
" |
|
3P OPTION |
4505 Companies |
Post. |
|
Head Trax (HR Update) |
18737 " |
e-mail + Book Post |
|
Make A WAR/Make Peace |
180 Small Co's |
Book Post |
|
Redundant Advt. |
1049 Big Co's Whose
job-advt. we Scanned & uploaded |
First Class Mail |
|
Keeping Score |
1686 Cos |
Book Post |
Export to Sheets
Please do read these.
In another 3/4 days, each
of you will directly receive in your mailbox
- concerned Shopping Baskets
- Corpo. Job-Postings
Hopefully, before long, each
Shopping-Basket will get automatically converted to 3P HOT JOB & get
posted on our website, after hiding client contact data. However, Job
key No. (AR. No) will carry your "initials" so you will
get the concerned resumes directly in your mailbox.
If you have any Suggestions,
please feel free
- to tell me
- discuss with Nirmit / CMT
- discuss in Saturday meeting.
Now, DAMN THE MARTINI &
FULL STEAM AHEAD.
Goodluck! (Signature/Initials)
NUMBER OF
"COMPANIES" WHICH YOU ARE MANAGING/WILL MANAGE
|
CONSULTANT |
NO. OF INDUSTRIES WHICH YOU
ARE MANAGING |
3P'S PAST CLIENTS (INVOICES) |
3P'S CURRENT CLIENTS (ORDERS) |
3P'S POTENTIAL CLIENTS
(INCLUDING DUPLICATIONS) |
OTHER SOURCES / MASTERS |
||
|
Source: Scanned/ Entered |
Source: Job-Advts on our
website Shopping Basket Converted to 3P HOT JOB |
Source: Corpo. Job- Advt.
Posting on Web |
Soma's 16000 |
||||
|
Thakur |
56 |
66 |
645 |
82 |
36 |
1497 |
11951 |
|
Shankar |
21 |
14 |
433 |
13 |
17 |
725 |
3042 |
|
Ketki |
14 |
3 |
60 |
10 |
5 |
528 |
806 |
|
Suchitra |
17 |
11 |
148 |
6 |
6 |
503 |
2380 |
|
Maya |
7 |
7 |
96 |
3 |
19 |
12 |
616 |
|
Sheetal |
21 |
5 |
101 |
11 |
13 |
349 |
1416 |
|
Mayuri |
2 |
6 |
519 |
13 |
69 |
281 |
565 |
|
Pradeep |
19 |
3 |
78 |
3 |
10 |
1120 |
849 |
|
TOTAL |
156 |
115 |
2200 |
142 |
326 |
14799 |
22125 |
Export to Sheets
Order Execution 1
All Consultants
(cc: Nirmit)
24/8/99
ORDER BOOKING
Experience of most companies is
that - when you submit 10 "offers/tenders", you get one
"order".
i.e. "hit-rate" is just
10%!
Sometimes even less!
Our business is no different.
Look at our "Shopping Baskets". Last month we got converted
into an "ORDER"?
(I am assuming that
- we sent out "terms" to each
- we followed up vigorously, each,
A related question is,
"Are we too rigid/inflexible
in our TERMS?"
That won't work!
Especially when "market"
is "down" and our competitors are even more "starved
(of orders)" than we are!
If we want in increase our "MARKET-SHARE"
in a shrinking market, then, we would need to become
- much more "aggressive"
- much more "flexible/dynamic"
Question
- what "principles/guide lines"
shall we keep in mind while quoting terms?
- what minimum/floor level we must have, below
which we will NOT stoop, as far as our professional fees are
concerned?
You must, soon, debate these 2
questions amongst yourself, find answers and laydown such "guidelines"
for all to follow.
Working arrangement should
be such that as long as you "quote" / "negotiate" WITHIN
the guidelines, you need NOT ask anyone.
(But, of course, you must ensure
that
- what you initially "quoted"
and
- what you finally "accepted"
MUST BE CAREFULLY RECORDED
against each "Search Assignment / shopping Basket. It must be given
to Client in writing & you must also obtain his "acceptance"
in writing.
This is a MUST under all
circumstances.
Then,
If you have to Venture OUTSIDE
of the GUIDELINES, you should consult Nirmit and convince him with your
arguments as to why you recommend deviation & of course how much deviation.
In the enclosed chart, I have
listed a few (there must be more) situations/scenarios that you may encounter
in your dealing with Clients.
I have also listed four possible
scenarios (I am getting too serious!) of 3P's internal processes.
The internal process that
we are required to "adopt" in each case, dictates our "efforts".
If we have to put in very little
effort (and the chance of success is very high) then, obviously, we can
afford to quote LOW/ (rock bottom even) to make sure that we do not lose
that order!
Considering that most of our
effort goes in "conducting" preliminary interviews (there
is as yet - no way this process can be automated), we can afford to quote LOW,
if we are NOT required to conduct preliminary interviews. Ask clients
this question "sharply" and tell me
that our offer (terms) depends
upon what is going to be our SCOPE OF WORK.
If "prelim.
interviewing" is LEFTOUT of our scope of work (i.e. no value-addition on
our part), then we can give him a very COMPETITIVE terms.
This is because, when MODULE
#2 (ORDER EXECUTION MODULE) gets implemented, the remaining processes will
get AUTOMATED, requiring very little manual-input on part of a Consultant.
These processes are
- Searching database
- Shortlisting
- Sending-out "Interest Letters"
to candidates
- Sending-out "Resumes" to
client
- Receiving short-list from client (of
candidates he wants to interview)
- Sending-out "interview-call"
letters
- Receiving (from client) interview schedule
- Getting "confirmation" from candidates
& forwarding to client
After 6 months of internal
"TRIAL" on our INTRANET, the Module 2 will shift to
INTERNET WEBSITE. If a client can log into our website & monitor the
status of his "search-assignment" on his own & directly, even
the phone-calls to consultants will come down! so even that time will be
saved.
Remember
In internet-economy, our
"COSTS" cannot dictate our selling-price! The Customer does not give
a damn about what it costs you to run your business/to executive his order.
Our own selling-price is dictated
by only one thing - our Competitor's selling-price! For customer,
everything else is immaterial (for same quality & level of service, of
course!).
So, let us work backward from Competitor's
Selling Price our own Selling price our Costs our automated business processes.
Please get together & decide
before week-end!
Regards
(Signature/Initials)
24/8/99
cc: Cyril
We are getting desperate for
Module 2!!
QUOTING PROFESSIONAL FEES/TERMS -
ADOPTING A FLEXIBLE APPROACH
24-8-99
|
IF (SCENARIO) ↓ |
3P's Internal Process |
|||
|
Selling Resumes |
No Prelim. Interviewing |
Prelim. Interv. viewing by
3P |
Full-scale Head-Hunt |
|
|
1. Very first
"dealing" - Introductory Offer? Hook |
$\times$ |
|||
|
2. Multi National Client (Grab) |
$\times$ |
|||
|
3. Willing to give assignment
on "EXCLUSIVE" basis |
$\times$ |
|||
|
4. Client promises
"Minimum Annual Billing"/business |
$\times$ |
|||
|
5. One Year Contract? |
$\times$ |
|||
|
6. Contract for all
"Group-Companies"? |
$\times$ |
|||
|
7. Will not give
"Min" Search Fees (Retainer) |
$\times$ |
|||
|
8. Insists on free replacement
(in 3 months) |
$\times$ |
$\times$ |
||
|
9. Willing to pay for Advt.
Cost |
$\times$ |
$\times$ |
||
|
10. Will not pay
"Out-of-Pocket Exp." |
$\times$ |
$\times$ |
||
|
11. Will not pay "Progress
Payment". |
$\times$ |
|||
|
12. Poor
"Market-image" of Client |
$\times$ |
|||
|
13. Very Large Indian Group
(e.g. Tata/Reliance) |
$\times$ |
|||
|
14. Client requirement
identical to a "recent" Search (ready, short-listed candidates) -
Little Work |
$\times$ |
|||
|
15. We have great database on
type of candidate required - prob. of appointment is very high. |
$\times$ |
stationary
we must ensure adequate stock of
all types of stationaries, e.g.
- Letterheads/Xeroxing papers/Fax rolls (plenty)
- Envelopes/How-to-log into Xtra.net for Job
Search pamphlets
- Telegram forms
- stamped Receipts for travel reimbursement
- stamped Receipts for Overnight stay expenses
- Broad Continuous stationary
- Labels
- Ribbons/Cartridges
APPLICANT- PROFILE
I am asking candidates to cut
along dotted lines which will also cover our logo/address area - so, hopefully,
we will get this portion also.
My idea is to stick a label on
this area and put a rubber stamp on it as shown-
|
Rating |
□ |
Interview |
□ |
|
Resume |
$\square$ |
Call |
$\square$ |
|
Prelim |
$\square$ |
Date |
$\square$ |
|
Final |
$\square$ |
$\square$ |
M = Morning Call
A = Afternoon
(Although all will report at 8:30
am)
TANYA's role
She will be getting hundreds
of phone-calls daily from candidates to inquire
- Have you received my faxed profile?
- What is my status re: interview-call?
- I have received your call-letter and I am
confirming that I will attend/I cannot attend
He will give his name $\to$
He will give his names $\to$
PEN
On her computer, she should have
a Screen/Software running. All she does, when a person calls, is to type
his name on the screen which would look like follows
|
CLIENT: |
Name: [_] |
Advt No. [_] |
|
Address |
PEN. |
|
Position Applied For: |
[_] |
|
|
Already entered for sending
call-letter |
Whether called for
interview? |
$\square$ Y $\square$ N |
|
Auto Picked Up from Appl.
Profile & Label / Info on ft of call-letter |
Date of Interview: [_] |
|
|
automatically decided from
Sft. |
Whether entitled to
Outstation Reim |
$\square$ Y $\square$ N |
|
Tanya to enter this field
when candidate calls-up |
Whether candidate attending
interview? |
$\square$ YES $\square$ NO |
Transfer data to Interview
Schedule
Mr. Negle has already
developed some screens/software for "Interview - Scheduling &
Follow-up".
Some 4/5 months back, I
had also developed some interview - follow up forms/screens and circulated to Nirmit/Thakur/Urmila/Sujata
etc.
This may be a good time to take a
hard-look at what Mr. Negle has developed and see if we can put
it to use (with or without modifications suggested by me 4/5 months back).
Shall I talk to Cyril/Yogesh to take this up on priority basis?
Saleem These screens of
"Corporate Databases" are picked-up from Order Exec. System
(OES). The Corpo. database screens which you are developing will be many
(maybe $6$ or $7$) but these/following $3$ Screens must be identical so that
you are able to "migrate" the data in both direction, without
any problems. That is, Janam Kundali for ADITYA BIRLA. You should be
able to transfer data from:
- Corpo. Database to OES
- from OES to Corpo. Database
very easily - at source of
information - the click of a key mouse.
Client Details:
|
Client Name: |
ADITYA BIRLA |
Branch: |
THREE P CONSULTANTS PVT.
LTD ← Wrong! |
|
Contact Person: |
Dr Santrupt Mishra |
Designation: |
PRESIDENT / EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR |
|
Address: |
Industry House 1st Floor
Nariman Point Mumbai, MAHARASHTRA INDIA - 400021 |
Email: |
|
|
Phone: |
2047987 |
||
|
Fax: |
|||
|
Mobile: |
9820011205 |
||
|
Source of Information: |
PERSONAL REFERENCE |
OES V.2. |
Legal Company Details:
|
Legal Company Name: |
GRASIM INDUSTRIES LIMITED |
Parent Group Name: |
ADITYA BIRLA GROUP |
|
Industry Name: |
TEXTILES |
||
|
Contact Person: |
Mr.Chandrashekhar Chavan |
Designation: |
MANAGER |
|
Address: |
Industry House Churchgate
Reclamation Churchgate Mumbai, MAHARASHTRA INDIA - 400 021 |
Web Site: |
|
|
Email: |
shekhar@adityabirla.com |
||
|
Phone: |
022-2870534 |
||
|
Fax: |
|||
|
Mobile: |
|||
|
what is this? |
Order / Shopping Basket
Executed History
|
Inquiry No. |
Inquiry Date |
Consultant |
Proposal No. |
Proposal Date |
SON |
Proposal Type |
Terms |
Tapan (Applitech) says, these
columns cannot be combined (in order to save space) since data is picked up
from different "tables"! So, if we want to upload this screen on our
website, we are stuck with this arrangement!!
OES V.2.
Client Name: [_]
Client Code: [_]
Shopping Basket History
|
S# No |
Shop Basket No / date |
Proposal No / date |
SON date |
Terms Invoice value |
Position Name (Designation) |
Consultant Responsible |
|
12% 1,50,000 |
Venkat
24/08/01
Client Janam Kundli (OES)
Saleem is developing $6/7$
screens for "Corporate Database". To begin with, we will transfer
into this database, data about $5.5$ lakh registered companies listed in a
CD released by DCA (Dept of Company Affairs). Athi's friend
managed to crack the code and Athi is in the process of installing this
database in both the offices. Once installed in Oracle or MS ACCESS, our
consultants would be able to search/list Companies:
- City Wise
- Industry Wise
- Products / services wise
Of course, any Company can be
found by its "NAME".
The data contained in the CD,
gives contact info for each company + Industry to which it belongs +
products / services that it manufactures / provides.
The $6/7$ Screens of Corporate
Database which Saleem is developing will be initially accessible within
our office. After testing its usefulness for a few months, I propose to
upload, some of these screens onto our website. Shopping Basket History
will be one of these screens.
Idea is to give to each of our
corporate client, a unique:
- Login name
- Password
using which, the authorised HR
Manager (of a particular client company) would be able to access his
company's "PERSONAL PAGE" on our website, where he can see all
kind of HISTORICAL DATA about his Company's DEALINGS / RELATIONSHIP with 3P,
irrespective of, whether those "dealings" were "online"
or "offline".
"Shopping Basket
History" is one such record.
Other (Historical) records,
contemplated are:
- Job Advt. Posting History
- Resume-Search History
- In future, we plan to introduce "registration"
of a corporate, before he can conduct resume-search. He would be required
to "log-in" before he can conduct a resume-search.
- "Resumes Forwarded" History
against each Job-Advt. (Thru Resume Forwarding Service)
- "Candidate Alerts" (sent) History
(This could be part of Job-Advt Posting History)
Saleem is in the process of
designing all these screens.
As far as "Shopping
Basket History" Screen is concerned, the ideal thing would be to
simply pick it up from OES & upload on the website. I have drawn
such a screen, at the beginning of this note. Please ask Saleem to join you
when you discuss this issue with Tapan.
cc: Saleem
24/08/01
Cyril
7-8-99.
OES V 2.0.
The Ultimate Customer
In her book "Customers.com",
author Patricia Seybold keeps talking again & again about
distinguishing between:
- the intermediary (Agent)
- &
- the ultimate Customer.
She says, our website - and all
our business-processes should target the "ultimate" customers and
make it easy for them to conduct business with us.
In our executive-search business,
the HR Manager is really an "agent". The people he hires
rarely work in the HR Dept and report to him!
In any Organisation, most of the
executives recruited work in depts. such as:
- production
- Design
- sales
- purchase
- marketing
- maintenance
So, it is the "Line
Managers" of these depts (the
dept-heads/section-heads/division-heads/group-heads/region-heads etc) who
are our ultimate customers.
Besides targetting the HR
Managers, we must also target these ultimate customers. We must get THEM
to conduct "headhunt" on our website. They must experiment and
findout how easy-and quick-it is to locate an executive from our vast database.
If they are convinced about the efficiency
- and effectiveness - of our PROCESS, they will bring pressure on the HR
Manager to use only www.3p-jobsearch.com and forget about advertising in
newspapers.
Here, one important common
characteristic of all line-managers (in practically all Indian corporations)
come to our help.
They are all poor planners!
All of them wake-up at the
last minute and want their man yesterday! Ask any HR Manager.
So If they are offered a better/superior
alternative to newspaper job-advt & a 6 month Recruitment Process
Cycletime, they would jump at it.
If, headhunting on www.3p-jobsearch.com
can get their man in 2 months
instead of 6 months, they would never look at any other option - because
headhunting on our website:
- eliminates the need to think & plan
Vacancies months ahead in a systematic way under uncertain future
conditions
- covers-up his inefficiency/lack-of-planning
However, in a scenario where even
HR Mgs are finding it difficult to log on and conduct an online headhunt,
to get other line-managers to do this, is going to be difficult. It will
take time & a lot of "educating" of the line managers.
It is with this in mind that I
thought of distributing our Resume Database (with our Search software) on a CD,
to as many HR Managers as we can.
(Please see draft of my
Circular/form of which, we are about to print & distribute $\approx 15000$
copies).
I suspect - and hope that when
they get these CD's the HR Managers would talk about that to other
line managers.
managers - and may even take
their help in viewing the contents.
Once our CD gets an
"entry" into an Organisation, it is bound to circulate amongst
line-managers. Since cost-of-reproduction is not very high, we will ask HR
Mgs if he wants more copies for distribution amongst his line-managers.
Then again, we have name/designation
(and of course, office addresses) of over $30,000$ "line-managers"
obtained from Annual Reports - to whom we can DIRECTLY write, asking
whether "they" would like to get their own "personal" copy
of our CD! - free too!
After 6 months, I would
like to send them an "upgrade" version of CD, where "Candidate
Profiles" would be much more detailed, while still not
revealing their identities. You will recall that this "shortcoming"
was pointed out to us by:
- HR Mgs who attended our presentations at Royal
Indian Club
- Neville Vazifdar of Times of India
We are, ourselves, acutely
conscious of this lacuna and want to set it "right" at the
earliest.
It is quite likely that the current
brief "profile" does NOT help a headhunter to make up his mind re:
the suitability (or otherwise) of a candidate.
In turn, the headhunter, after
seeing the profiles of "short-listed" candidates may be shying
away from filling up & sending to us! the "Shopping Basket".
I strongly feel, we would get a huge response if we overcome this problem.
You are aware that all the
job-sites (whether Indian or American) reveal, almost the entire resume of
every candidate. This is why there is a huge traffic of headhunters to
these sites.
Without revealing his
"identity", we should reveal everything about a candidate. Then
only headhunters will come to our site.
After distribution of CD's, the
next step I propose is to CONSOLIDATE our gap by making available to all HR
Managers, MODULE 2 - ORDER EXECUTION SOFTWARE!!
In "Customers.com",
Patricia Seybold tells us, again & again,
"Get your customers to use
on their internal INTRANETS, the same software that they get to use on your
website. Get them accustomed - get them habituated. Let there be a
mirror-imaging on Internet & Intranets. Let there be seamless integration."
Once your customers get used to same
software / same features / same search capabilities / same functionalities on
their INTRANETS, then they are "hooked" to your website for ever.
They will neither think of developing something else on their own nor think of
deserting your website.
They are truly locked-in!
Several American Companies have
done this - and reaped huge rewards! The book is full of examples.
I, too, think there is a lot of
truth in this.
If you look at the 21 steps of
Order Execution chart, the activities are divided between
- Action to be taken by 3P
- " " by Client (HR Mgr)
- " " by Candidates.
NOW, if we replace,
"3P" with HR Manager,
& "Client" with Line Manager (internal client),
We have a situation (internal to
the client's Organisation) which is not very different
3P (Service Provider) | HR Mgr.
(Service Provider)
Module 2 on our Website | Module
2 on client's INTRANET
Candidate | Candidate
HR Mgr. (Intermediate Client) |
Line Manager (Ultimate Client)
MIRROR IMAGING
This means,
Using our Module 2 Software, an
HR Manager will track/follow-up/execute any "Vacancy" which he has
himself directly "advertised" in newspapers on behalf of his client
(Viz: line managers).
The HR Mgr replaces "3P"
as the "executor" of this search-assignment!
All "business-processes"
remain same!
HR Mgr treats line-manager
as "client" and line-manager treats HR Mgr. as
"Service-provider".
Both can "track/monitor"
all 21 steps (listed in my Module 2 notes) on their internal LAN
/ INTRANET.
And when they go to WWW.3p-jobsearch.com,
they find the same, familiar inter-face & same features &
same functions!
Can we discuss this further when
we meet on Monday?
Regards,
cc: Nimu cc: sajida
cc: All Consultants
Pl. read & be prepared for
discussing on Monday
7/8/99.
HR Update - No. 2 Aug.
1999
Dear Sir/Madam:
6 cents (Rs. 2.5) per Resume?
Whether in USA or in India,
that is cheap, real cheap! In my last letter, I had mentioned how Microsoft
manages its Human Resources using digital technology. In the
enclosed "extract", you will learn how
- HUMANA has reduced cost of receiving a
resume to 6 c / resume
- CISCO has managed to recruit 2000
employees each year for 7 years in a row by automating 70 %
of its recruitment process.
If all of you were to
successfully implement what HUMANA / CISCO have managed, we would soon
go out of business!
But if you are hiring less than 100
persons each year, you have no need to setup your own website devoted to
"digital recruiting". It would make much more sense for you to
log onto
and simulate, as schematically
shown on enclosed charts,
- Scenario # 1 ...... Post Your Job-Advt on
our website (free)
- Scenario # 2 ...... Conduct Online
Headhunt on our site.
But if you hate the www
(World Wide Web) and prefer to conduct your headhunting "offline",
there is an option! By filling-in the form on the reverse, become a member of 3P
CLUB and get your FREE copy of our Resume Database CD. You
will end up saving lakhs of rupees which you normally spend on job-advts in
newspapers. You will also reduce your Recruitment Process Cycle-time
from 6 months to 2 months!
For posting their job-advts on
our website we thank,
Birla 3M | TCS | Emerck
Videocon | L&T | Hughes Ispat
Godrej | NRC | Alfa Laval
Bajaj Auto | ATUL | + and 200
other Corporates!
With regards,
Hemen Parekh
Principal Consultant
AFTER TICKING () APPROPRIATE
BOXES AND FILLING-IN IN CAPITAL LETTERS, PLEASE FAX THIS FORM ON 022-850
6663
Dear Mr. Parekh,
- Yes, I would like to become a member of 3P CLUB
and would like you to send me the following databases (free-of-cost):
- 51000 + Executive Resumes [ ]
- Salary Data of 30,000 executives [ ]
- Statutory Returns I need to file [ ]
- Labour Laws [ ]
- Model Voluntary Retirement Scheme [ ]
will be sent on a CD provided a
minimum of 1000 requests are received.
Please send at my following
e-mail address: .......................................
- I have access to a computer at office [ ] / home [
]. When sending e-mail to me, please configure for Internet Explorer [
] / Netscape Navigator [ ].
- If you start a bulletin board on www.3p-jobsearch.com, I would be happy to
participate by
- Contributing articles [ ]
- Sharing my experience [ ]
- Answering questions raised by [ ]
HR professional members
- Besides posting on the Bulletin Board, questions
& answers will be distributed to all members thru e-mail.
- My Contact Information
- Name :
.............................................. Surname
.............................................. First Name
- Company Name :
................................................................................................
- Designation :
................................................................................................
|
Please communicate with me
on |
Office Add. [ ] / Resi.
Add. [ ] / Either Add. [ ] |
|
Office Address :
.............................................. |
Resi : Address :
.............................................. |
|
.............................................. |
.............................................. |
|
City : ........................
PIN ........................ |
City : ........................
PIN ........................ |
|
Phone:
.............................................. |
Phone:
.............................................. |
|
Fax :
.............................................. |
Mobile:
.............................................. |
|
e-mail:
.............................................. |
e-mail:
.............................................. |
|
Date
.............................................. |
Sign :
.............................................. |
$*$ These databases will be
distributed electronically-only thru e-mail. You can obtain a free email
address from Yahoo.com/Hotmail.com/Malleity.com/Jadoo.com/123india.com
PJP / CMT / Nimit Module 1 &
2
Module # 2
I hope, by Monday
(13$^\text{th}$), you will handover to Cyril, a
FEATURE-WISE IMPLEMENTATION
SCHEDULE
for Module 2
in the format I sent to you last
week.
Let Module 2 be broken-up in 6
PHASES (if reqd.) but ask Cyril to implement ONE PHASE EVERY MONTH!
TIME is the essence!
See enclosed note. Pl- study
WORK-EXPEDITOR yourself. If reqd. talk to COMPAQ guy in presence of Cyril. $
4000 price-tag is NOT the question even if a ready-made software package does
only 50% of what you want! Important thing to be assured is
- will ready-made package, do, at least 50% ?
- can it be implemented in 4 weeks?
Y
10/9/99.
Master File
CYRIL
MODULE # 2
ORDER EXECUTION MODULE
|
**Our Business Process |
To be covered by** |
|
$\circ$ Executive Database
Creation |
Module # 1 |
|
$\circ$ " " Search |
|
|
$\circ$ Order Execution |
Module # 2. |
I have sent you an exhaustive
folder on the Order Execution Module. This folder comprises
- Order Execution Process Flow Chart showing
activities (and interaction/sequence) to be carried out by
- Client
- 3P staff
- Candidates
- Some 6/7 statements (forms) which depict the
"status" of each & every order/assignment at
any given point of time
The main features of Module #
2 should be:
- No duplication of data-entry
- Minimum of "hard-copies" of any
forms or statements (incl. print outs)
- No need to first fill in a "blank" form
(hardcopy) and subsequently transferring to "electronic" media
(i.e. computer).
Wherever possible, relevant forms
should be called on the screen and the data should be entered directly.
- This means, "consultants" should not
write down info on pieces of papers and pass-on to Priya or other Data
Entry Operators to enter in computer.
They should enter the data in the
computer themselves - and directly - preferally while "listening" to
a client or a candidate on the telephone.
- In course of time, we must train/educate - the
clients and - the candidates to enter the data/search query themselves by
remotely logging into our databases.
These could be
- interview dates/schedules
- interview confirmations
Already today, on our website,
- Clients are entering "Job Posting
Requests"
- Candidates " "Job Search /
Resume"
- Clients " "Head Hunt"
- etc.
I am aiming to extend this same
logic to all the processes involved in "ORDER EXECUTION".
This is going to take time - may
be long time - and lot of patient "education" of not only our
own staff but also the Clients and the Candidates.
Whereas Candidates may ultimately
fall in line and do their own "data-entry" by remotely logging in,
the Clients will resist strongly!
Afterall, they are the ones who
are "paying" us for the service and they would expect US to do the
dirty-work!
Again many of the Clients may be
computer-illiterate.
- All these will mean that the computer / Human
interface would have to be very intuitive/very friendly.
In this connection, I enclose
some literature downloaded from COMPAQ website.
Since we, already have
- WINDOW NT
- Microsoft Back Office / Outlook
- Microsoft Exchange
- etc.
Compaq "WORK
EXPEDITOR" may be of interest to us, if you think, it is possible to
build our ORDER EXECUTION APPLICATION around "work expeditor".
If we could work thru a standard,
ready, bought-out software package, we have following advantages:
- It will drastically cut down "application
development" time (this is the critical issue)
- why "re-invent the wheel"?
- Possibility of future "up-grades"
- Compaq / Ms website based support
- Less "educating" of clients &
candidates
- Possible integration with ORACLE / MS-SQL
/ our internet / extranet databases / applications
If all factors are favourable, we
can afford to invest $ 4000.
with regard!
Y
COMPAQ has announced the
immediate availability of Work Expeditor, a collaboration and work management
solution developed for Microsoft Outlook and Exchange messaging and
collaboration infrastructure. Work Expeditor is the only Microsoft Exchange
work management product that integrates document collaboration, workflow,
data/form management and flexible program- mable capabilities in a single
product. The software helps businesses increase productivity and flexibility by
managing document-intensive work and securely maximizing information flow.
Work Expeditor is available
immediately from Compaq and select early channel partners. A full channel
program is announced by the year-end.
Compaq Microsoft Enterprise
Computing
Customizable Work Management
Software Helps Workers
Increase Productivity and
Flexibility in Team Environments
BOSTON, Sept. 8, 1998 - Compaq
Computer Corporation (NYSE: CPQ) today announced immediate worldwide
availability of its Work Expeditor, a collaboration and work management
solution developed for the Microsoft Exchange/Outlook messaging and
collaboration infrastructure. Work Expeditor v1.1 is the only Microsoft
Exchange work management product that integrates document collaboration,
workflow, data/form management and flexible programmable capabilities
in a single product. The software helps businesses increase productivity
and flexibility by managing document-intensive work and securely
maximizing information flow.
Work Expeditor v 1.1 is available
immediately from Compaq and select early channel partners. A full
channel program will be announced by year end. Compaq is demonstrating Work
Expeditor and its new Collaboration Services (announced separately
today) at the Microsoft Exchange Conference in Boston, Sept.
9-11 (Booth # 546 at Boston's World Trade Center).
"With Work Expeditor,
we are building on our leadership and experience to help customers leverage and
extend their Exchange systems to the next level of business-to-business
collaboration and workflow," said John Rando, Senior Vice
President and Group Executive, Compaq Services. "As Microsoft's
first worldwide Prime Integrator for Windows NT and Microsoft
BackOffice, Compaq is the industry's number one integrator of Microsoft
Exchange. Our experience, coupled with the robustness of our Work Expeditor
software, offers Exchange customers an unbeatable value proposition."
Builds on Microsoft Exchange
Capabilities
"Compaq Work Expeditor
allows customers to take advantage of the collaboration capabilities in the Microsoft
Exchange messaging infrastructure," said Charlie Stevens, Vice
President of Microsoft Corporation. "In addition, Work Expeditor
is consistent with the Microsoft Outlook interface to give users quick and
easy access to their work. This enables different work teams to collaborate on
information and resources across multiple environments."
Work Expeditor provides
comprehensive, advanced capabilities to help customers rapidly build
collaboration and workflow solutions on their Microsoft Exchange platforms.
Work Expeditor provides:
- real-time, dynamic collaboration
- an extensive security framework, with access
control down to the individual document and data field definition level,
based upon user roles and organizational positions
- an audit trail of all activities
- transaction and document integrity
- a graphical user interface for ad-hoc and
role-based workflow
- transparent integration into Outlook
- point-and-click menu selections for easily
building collaborative solutions, as well as highly customized solutions
using standard Microsoft interfaces such as Collaborative Data Objects
(CDO).
Robust Security and Flexible
Workflow
"The California State
Legislature produces thousands of documents and bills, moving through thousands
of hands," said Schrab Monsourian, Information Technology Advisor
for the State of California Legislative Data Center. "Compaq's Work
Expeditor for Microsoft Exchange has the capability to provide us with robust
security and flexible workflow and programming tools to support both dynamic
and routine work in our legislative process. We believe Work Expeditor could
reduce the time spent collecting changes and re-routing documents for approval.
Based on our evaluation of the Work Expeditor, the seamless integration with
Microsoft Outlook would make it simpler for our customers to learn and use."
Collaboration - A Critical
Factor
"The ability for teams and
companies to collaborate and share documents is a critical productivity factor
in many industries today," said Tim Sloane, Analyst, Aberdeen
Group. "Work Expeditor builds on the Microsoft Exchange foundation
and adds significantly to businesses' ability to create collaboration solutions
for their specific requirements."
In addition, Work Expeditor
stores documents, forms and folders in a configurable and programmable
business object repository based on SQL Server technology. The
repository contains a description of the people on the team, as well as
processes, the roles and responsibilities of the people on the team, as well as
access control to work information. Users have access to this repository
through the Outlook Form Designer and the Work Expeditor
configuration tools. With these tools, users can create robust form-based
applications quickly without complex programming.
Availability and Pricing
Work Expeditor is available today
from Compaq and select resellers. Pricing from Compaq starts at $3,000 for the
server software and one client license 3000
A single additional client
license is $189, with volume pricing below $100$ +1000 for TEN Users.
Compaq's new lifecycle
Collaboration Services are available custom-quoted from Compaq services (see
related press release issued today at the Microsoft Exchange Conference).
Company Background
Founded in 1982, Compaq
Computer Corporation is a Fortune Global 100 company. Compaq is the
second largest computer company in the world and the largest global supplier of
personal computers. Compaq develops and markets hardware, software,
solutions and services, including industry-leading enterprise computing
solutions, fault-tolerant business-critical solutions, networking and
communication products,
commercial desktop and portable
products and consumer PCs. The company is an industry leader in environmentally
friendly programs and business practices.12
Compaq products are sold
and supported in more than 100 countries through a network of authorized Compaq
marketing par3tners. Customer support and information about Compaq
and its products are available at 4http://www.compaq.com.
return to top
LEGAL NOTICES AND PRIVACY
STATEMENT
Module 1-2
CYRIL
5/4/99.
DATABASES
Our Core Competence should
be to get hold of interesting (ready-made) databases or getting these
created with the help of outside Vendors and thereafter, devising "Search
Software" for our website surfers to retrieve the data in different
combinations.
We must not, create the databases
ourselves, by employing an army of data-entry operators. There is very little
"Value Addition" in this work and therefore, it is best to sub-contract
it.
Enclosed list shows some of the
databases created by ZAVERI COMPUTERS (Andheri) and available for
a "price".
I have, marked these as either
- Corporate Databases
or
- Executive Databases.
Many of these are of great
interest - and value - to us, even though "incomplete" in many
respects from our point of view.
Many will have "duplications"
of fields.
Many will cover same person
(executive) or Corporate - but in slightly different context.
If only, we could devise a SOFTWARE
which would "recognise" the duplication & eliminate
it, we could have an extremely POWERFUL, INTEGRATED, NORMALISED database
which keeps growing incrementally over weeks/months/years.
Irrespective of
"Source" / fields, we should be able to dump all databases into ONE
database
OR
One for Corporates &
Another for Executives.
We should not have to worry from
"where & in which form", the data came.
I strongly urge you to visit
Zaveri Computers along with Nirmit, whenever you can set-aside couple of hours,
to view what Vipul Zaveri (very cooperative / friendly) has to offer.
Then we can decide how to go
about.
Y
5/4/99
cc: Nirmit
EXECUTIVE DATA:
- Name
- Add.
- Phone
- Fax =
- Employer
- Designation
- Birthdate (Age)
- Salary
- Edu. Quali
- Exp.
- Yrs. with current co.
- Past Employers
- Function
- References
CORPORATE DATA:
- Name
- Address: RO, Br. Off, Reg. Off, Factories
- Products/Industry
- _ 2. _
- _
- Collaborators
- JV Partners
- Financial Results
- Phone
- Fax
- E mail
- URL
- Directors Names ($\&$ addresses)
- Other Executives
- Public Ltd / Pvt. Ltd
- New Projects
EXECUTVE CORPORATION
NIRMIT I have, today, handed over
to Cyril a complete folder containing photo-copies of all of my old notes, as
per "INDEX enclosed.
Cyril
2/5/99
3/5/99
Sub: Order Execution Module
OES V 2.0
The enclosed note (E-MAIL)
is 5 years old (23-4-94).
At that time, internet was
beyond horizon. So, it is not surprising that, in the enclosed note, I have
talked about the concept of a HELP-DESK with several technical &
commercial support staff
- taking "Orders" over telephone
- answering "Queries" "
The concept of a Client,
placing order thru internet tracking / monitoring progress of his
"order" on our website Simply did not exist!
But, in 1999, things are Vastly
different.
Although "Help-Desks"
do exist (even on websites), it is only a matter of time, before these
become OBSOLETE.
More & more Companies are
using Internet (their website) as a CENTRE PIECE/ANCHOR
around which, all their business-processes are centred.
The Current scenario is somewhat
like
- Intranet
- Internal Business Processes
- Order Execution
- Admin
- Sales
- Accts
- HR
- R&D
- Extranet
- Supply-chain
- Vendors/
- Contractors/
- Suppliers/
- (Inventory Mgmt)
- Internet
- Company Information/Product Info.
- Help Desk/Tech. Support
- Order placement/credit card verification
- Customers/Clients
But I feel, for most Companies
(at least in U.S.A. / Europe / Japan), the barriers would fall
and there would be a SINGLE "interface" for
- Employees
- Suppliers
- Customers
That Single interface would be a
company's WEBSITE!
This has already happened with a
few large American Companies. Examples of these could be found in following
books
- Web Pages that Suck (sent to you)
- Webonomics (with Sajida)
- Business @ Speed of Thought (Bill Gates)
- Direct from DELL. (I am still reading)
If we had implemented HELP-DESK
5 years ago, that would have been fine. It might have even helped our staff
to get used to "doing business over telephone".
But having "waited",
I feel, it would be wise to simply "By-Pass" that stage of evolution
altogether and straightaway jump to the concept of FULLY INTERACTIVE SINGLE
INTERFACE (WEBSITE)
We may still develop our ORDER
EXECUTION SYSTEM (MODULE # 2) around our INTRANET & thoroughly
test it out before MERGING
with the INTERNET.
This will help us to "debug"
our internal business processes before exposing these (processes) to the
public-at-large.
Because,
if these (processes) do NOT
perform 100% correctly/accurately on our website, it might get adverse reaction
even ridicule and clients may NEVER RETURN!
Eg.
What is happening to our
MEMBERSHIP SERVICES (Edit / Auto Job Search / Job Mail Robot) for the last 8
months!!
But, our "goal" has to
be clear right now.
And that is,
"Merger of Intranet with
Internet".
Assuming that
- Implementation of Module # 1 takes 2
months (May/June)
- Development of Module # 2 (Order Execution)
covering features in the enclosed notes, takes
- 3 months (May/June/July)
- Testing of Module # 2 takes 2 months
(Aug/Sept.)
- Development of NEW WEBSITE (NT based) takes 2
months (Oct/Nov.)
- Merger of Module # 2 into NEW NT Based Website
takes
- 3 months (Dec/Jan/Feb 2000)
We are talking of a PROJECT
TIME FRAME of 12 months.
If we manage this Schedule (and
do you see any reason, why, we cannot ?), at the end of this
12 month period, we should be
ahead of
- all Indian job-sites
- most of the World's jobsites
By March 2000, I also
expect that, in India,
- Internet subscriber-base would have grown
substantially
- many ISP's would be operational
- "Internet-over-Cable" would have
become a reality (IN Cable / SITI cable & a Delhi Party which
expects to launch this by June 99). If this happens, millions of
home TV's will be able to "access" internet. (Hindustan
(IN), alone have 2.3 million cable TV connections in 12 cities).
- hundreds of Cyber-Cafés would have come up.
- Internet Connection charges would have
dropped drastically (each "late-comer" ISP would
have to drop prices to be able to enter the fray). (DISHNET
offering Rs. 1.8/hour in Pune/Chennai!).
- E-Commerce would have become a "little"
easier
In the books mentioned earlier, I
have underlined / marked-out sentences / pages / paras, which I would request
you to read, before you start working on Module # 2.
Unless, we have the GRAND
PICTURE in front of us, we would end-up on the periphery!
I subscribe to Jack Welch's (GE)
business philosophy, viz::
"If, in any business, you
cannot be either #1 or #2, get out of it!"
To implement this project, I am
ready to commit
- required funds
- my own time
- 3P's Organisational Support.
I am sending this note to you
with a request to commit
- your own personal time / attention
- a dedicated team of professionals
- a time-frame (with bonus / penalty clauses)
How Soon?
Regards
H P(arekh)
2/5/99
ORDER EXECUTION MODULE
SYSTEM REQUIREMENT
INDEX
|
Subject / Topic of Note |
Date |
|
MIS - Daily/weekly/Monthly
Statistics |
3-9-93 |
|
3 Dimensions
(Number/Timeframe/Reward) |
17-9-93 |
|
Interview Feedback from
Clients |
27-4-96 |
|
Order Backlog/Pending
Assignment Analysis |
29-11-98 |
|
10 Standard Statements |
11-7-93 |
|
Interview Follow-Up |
25-6-93 |
|
31-3-94 |
|
|
7-5-97 |
|
|
27-5-97 |
|
|
Follow Up |
|
|
- with our own staff |
30-3-94 |
|
- with Candidates |
|
|
- with clients |
29-3-94 |
|
Chasing Events &
Activities (To send what - When - whom) |
30-3-94 |
|
18 Screens (Pop-Up ?) of
PAPERLESS OFFICE |
12-11-94 |
|
26-11-94 |
|
|
Order Execution System -
MASTER CHART |
2-9-93 |
|
1-2-94 |
|
|
HELP DESK & QUERIES
(clients/candidates/Associates) |
23-4-94 |
|
16-11-94. |
|
NO. |
DATE RECEIVED |
CLIENT |
CONTACT PERSON |
TELEPHONE NUMBERS |
MODE |
TERMS |
MINIMUM FEES RECEIVED |
VACANCY |
POSTING LOCATION |
AGE CYB |
EXP CYB |
QUALIFICATION |
SALARY |
CURRENT STATUS |
|
I |
CABLE CORPORATION |
Mr. Kalyan Chakravarty |
P1 |
20% |
V.P Manufacturing |
Mumbai |
40-45 |
B E (Mech) |
7.50 lacs + Car (3.5.96) |
|||||
|
II |
SANIRA INTERNATIONAL |
Mr. Pankaj Singh |
10,666 |
D |
20% |
10000 |
Manager - Exports |
Ludhiana / New Delhi |
||||||
|
III |
CABLE CORPORATION |
Mr. Kalyan Chakravarty |
H |
20% |
Sr. Ex. V.P / CEO |
Mumbai |
4.0 |
|||||||
|
IV |
FORTUNE INTERNATIONAL |
Mr. Rakesh Aundelay |
D |
16.66 |
4000 |
Manager Exports |
Mumbai |
3.0 |
B. Com / B. Sc / Graduate |
|||||
|
V |
KEC INTERNATIONAL |
Mr. Vijay Rangnekar |
D |
GM - I T |
Mumbai |
|||||||||
|
D |
GM - Materials |
Mumbai |
||||||||||||
|
VII |
Kinetic Technology |
Mr. Chopdekar |
D |
16.66 |
Simulation Manager |
Mumbai |
||||||||
|
VIII |
Souza Schneider |
Mr. Thomas John |
D |
16.66 |
Sr. Sales Executive - S/M |
Mumbai |
||||||||
|
D |
16.66 |
Sr. Sales Executive - W/B |
Mumbai |
|||||||||||
|
IX |
CARGILL SEEDS |
Mr. Jogeasan |
D |
20% |
Manager Cooperative |
Jamnagar |
||||||||
|
X |
SHV Energy |
Mr. Ganesh Vinod |
D |
20% |
Legal Manager |
Mumbai |
||||||||
|
D |
20% |
Product Manager |
Mumbai |
|||||||||||
|
D |
20% |
Head - I T |
Mumbai |
|||||||||||
|
D |
20% |
Business Dev. Mgr. |
Hyderabad |
|||||||||||
|
XIV |
KCP Fuller |
Mr. S S Siddiqui |
D |
16.66 |
GM - Machinery |
Mumbai |
Note: The table layout is
preserved as closely as possible, including checkmarks () and crossed-out
entries.
|
NO. |
DATE RECEIVED |
CLIENT |
CONTACT PERSON |
TELEPHONE NUMBERS |
MODE |
TERMS |
MINIMUM FEES RECEIVED |
VACANCY |
POSTING LOCATION |
AGE CYB |
EXP CYB |
QUALIFICATION |
SALARY |
CURRENT STATUS |
|
XV |
COLOR CHEM |
Mr. V. Shirale |
D |
16.66 |
4000 |
Manager Logistics |
Thane |
|||||||
|
XVI |
COLOR CHEM |
Mr. V Shirale |
$\Delta$ |
16.66 |
4000 |
Manager Legal |
Mumbai |
|||||||
|
XVII |
TENGE |
Mr. TS Kothari |
D |
16.66 |
Manager Marketing |
Mumbai |
||||||||
|
XVIII |
Standard Batteries Lt |
Mr. Vibhay Sinha |
VP - Finance |
Mumbai |
||||||||||
|
XIX |
" |
" |
Sr VP - Industrial |
" |
||||||||||
|
XX |
" |
" |
Group VP - Auto |
" |
||||||||||
|
XXI |
" |
" |
GM - Marketing - Ind. |
" |
||||||||||
|
XXII |
" |
" |
GM - Marketing - Auto |
" |
||||||||||
|
XXIII |
" |
" |
GM - Materials |
" |
||||||||||
|
XXIV |
" |
" |
AGM - Materials |
" |
||||||||||
|
XXV |
" |
" |
GM - Mktg - Industrial |
Taloja |
||||||||||
|
XXVI |
Degremont Band. |
Mr. R. Arun Nageswar |
H |
20% |
M. D |
Mumbai |
Note: The table layout is
preserved as closely as possible, including checkmarks (), crossed-out entries
(), and lines indicating repeated information (or ).
PENDING ASSIGNMENT
|
CLIENT |
DATE OF ASSIGNMENT |
VACANCY |
POSTING LOCATION |
QUALIFICATION |
AGE |
EXP |
SALARY |
REMARKS |
STATUS |
|
Vickers International (CT) |
13 Feb 97 |
Materials Manager |
Kandivli |
BE (Mech) |
35-40 |
10-15 |
3 L |
Material Planning / V.D.I.
Purchase |
To Send additional Bios |
|
Cable Corporation of India
(CU) |
2 May 97 |
GM - Manufacturing |
Nasik |
BE (Mech / Elec) |
40-47 |
0 |
|||
|
JOHNSON & JOHNSON (CU) |
2 May 97 |
Plant Manager |
Aurangabad |
BE (Mech / CH / CM) |
35-40 |
10-15 |
|||
|
SAURASHTRA CEMENT (CU) |
GM (Finance + Accounts) |
Nariman Point |
CA |
35 |
8-10 |
0 |
Accounts / Audit / Budgeting
/ MIS / Taxation |
||
|
GM (Corporate Finance) |
Nariman Point |
CA / MBA (F) |
35 |
8-10 |
0 |
Treasury / Project Finance
Raising funds for F. T. |
|||
|
GM - Marketing |
Ahmedabad |
grad + MBA - Mkg |
35-40 |
8-10 |
|||||
|
KILBURN ENGINEERING (CT) |
GM - Manufacturing |
Baroda |
B E (Mech) |
40-45 |
20 |
Exp in Heavy Fabrication |
|||
|
GM (Finance + CS) |
Mumbai |
CA + CS |
45-55 |
15-20 |
More emphasis on raising
working capital |
||||
|
Dy. MD |
|||||||||
|
V.P / GM - Project Mktg. |
|||||||||
|
Procter - V.P |
GM |
Mumbai |
|||||||
|
Dy. GM. |
|
CLIENT |
DATE OF ASSIGNMENT |
VACANCY |
POSTING LOCATION |
QUALIFICATION |
AGE |
EXP |
SALARY |
REMARK |
STATUS |
|
PT Bina Gimia (CN) |
C F O |
Jakarta |
CA |
8-10 y |
Interviews Organised 4-20.5.97 |
||||
|
TAFE (CN) |
24 Jan 97 |
G M (Sales) |
Madras |
B E Mech / Agri + M B
A |
40-45 |
Bio-dates already sent |
|||
|
Asst G M (Logistics) |
Madras |
graduate + MBA |
45-50 |
||||||
|
Shapoorji Pallanji (CT) |
G M (Finance) |
Mumbai |
CA |
40 |
15 + |
Interviews over |
|||
|
South India Viscose (CT) |
V I P (Environmental) |
Coimbatore |
System to re-act Short
understand requirement |
||||||
|
CARGILL (S) |
Documentation Officer |
N Delhi |
graduate |
Bio-dates already sent |
|||||
|
PRISM CEMENT (CT) |
28 April 97 |
Dy G M - Finance |
Satna |
CA |
10-12 |
Mailed letter to send |
|||
|
Sr Mgr - Finance |
Allahabad |
CA |
8-10 |
||||||
|
K T I (CT) |
Simulation Manager |
N Delhi |
B E (Chemical) |
Interviews being organized |
|||||
|
FORTUNE INTERNATIONAL (CN) |
Export Manager |
Mumbai |
Suggestion Short-list
appointed |
||||||
|
N D D B (CT) |
G M - Finance |
Anand |
CA / ICWA / MBA |
45 |
20 |
To send Biodatas |
|||
|
G M - HRM |
Anand |
MBA / MSW |
40 |
15 |
Bios sent |
|
CLIENT |
DATE OF ASSIGNMENT |
VACANCY |
POSTING LOCATION |
QUALIFICATION |
AGE |
EXP |
SALARY |
REMARKS |
STATUS |
|
RELIANCE (CN) |
30 April |
Head of Non Technical / V P
- HRD |
Jamnagar Mumbai |
CA |
50 + |
||||
|
Head of H. R. |
Patalganga |
||||||||
|
Head of H. R. |
Jamnagar |
||||||||
|
Head of H. R. |
Hazira |
||||||||
|
INGERSOLL RAND C |
V. P. Mfgr. |
Ahmedabad |
B E (Mech) |
40 + |
20 + |
O |
|||
|
H D C T |
Piping Manager |
Mumbai |
Bio Sent |
||||||
|
G M / V P - Finance |
Mumbai |
||||||||
|
Asst. Manager - Mktg. |
Mumbai |
||||||||
|
Mahindra Construction (CT) |
10 Feb 97 |
Project Manager |
Mumbai |
B E (Civil) |
16-18 |
||||
|
Construction Manager (s) |
B E (Civil) |
12-15 |
|||||||
|
Contracts Manager |
B E (Civil) |
10-12 |
|||||||
|
Sr. Planning Engineer (s) |
B E (Civil) |
7-10 |
|||||||
|
Billing Engineer (s) |
B E (Civil) |
7-10 |
|||||||
|
Mahindra Properties (CT) |
Project Manager |
|
CLIENT |
DATE OF ASSIGNMENT |
VACANCY |
POSTING LOCATION |
QUALIFICATION |
AGE |
EXP |
SALARY |
REMARKS |
FOLLOW UP |
|
Himmatlal & Co (S) |
2 May 97 |
Secretary, Stenographer,
Receptionist/Tel. Ope. |
Colaba |
graduate |
5-6 2-3 2-3 |
0 0 0 |
To Advertise |
||
|
Section Incharge: Paper,
Polymer, Electronics, Petrochem |
Colaba |
graduate |
27-30 |
5 |
|||||
|
SHV Energy (CH) |
Head of Logistics,
Distribution Manager, Head of Legal |
|
No. |
Industry |
Function |
Designation Level (Actual) |
Brief Description |
Posting City |
Approx Salary Offered
(Annual) |
Edu. Qualification (incl.
Branch/Discipline) |
Age (Max) |
Exp (Min) |
Target Date |
|
1 |
Tirupati - Life |
Finance |
VICE - PRESIDENT - PROJECT
FINANCE |
15 YEARS IN BOTH EXPERIENCE IN
PROJECT FORMULATION, FUNDING, DEBT & FINANCIAL CLOSURE IN TURN-KEY/INFRA.
FUNDING. FUNDS LIKE LIC, HDFC, ICICI, SFC ETC. |
Mumbai |
15 Lacs $\pm$ |
CA / MBA Fin |
45 Yrs. |
15 Yrs. |
1st Aug, 2007 |
|
2 |
Advertising |
Media Research |
ASST. MANAGER |
MEDIA PLANNING, CREATIVE, MEDIA
BUYING, PROCUREMENT, CLIENT SERVICE, RESEARCH |
Mumbai |
3-6 Lacs $\pm$ |
MBA (SPACE MANG) |
27 Yrs. |
4 Yrs. |
1st Aug, 2007 |
|
3 |
Textiles (Birla) |
Sales |
GENERAL MANAGER |
SALES OF VISCOSE STAPLE FIBRE
TO CLIENT ORGANIZATION |
Mumbai |
3-5 Lacs $\pm$ |
MBA (Op. Man) / BE - TEXTILE |
35 Yrs. |
7 Yrs. |
1st Aug, 2007 |
|
4 |
Garments |
Product Management |
GROUP PRODUCT MANAGER |
PRODUCT MANAGEMENT OF THE
ENTIRE RANGE OF BRANDS OF A INDIA'S NO. 1 BRAND IN GARMENTS |
Bangalore |
10-15 Lacs $\pm$ |
MBA (H M) BE |
33 Yrs. |
10 Yrs. |
1st Aug, 2007 |
|
5 |
Port Operations |
Operations |
CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER |
EXPOSURE TO PORT OPERATIONS
INCLUDING PROJECTS, HARBOUR, CARGO HANDLING (BULK, CONTAINERIZED &
GENERAL) |
Mumbai / Haldia |
30 Lacs $\pm$ |
B E (CIVIL) |
45 Yrs. |
20 Yrs. |
1st Aug, 2007 |
|
6 |
Container Freight Station |
Operations |
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER |
RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTAINER
FREIGHT STATION OPERATION, OPERATIONS, CONTAINER TERMINALS, LOGISTICS |
Mumbai |
50 Lacs $\pm$ |
B E (MARINE) |
45 Yrs. |
20 Yrs. |
1st Aug, 2007 |
|
7 |
Birla - Retail |
Human Resources |
DIRECTOR |
HUMAN RESOURCES PROCESSES,
ALIGNMENT OF HR FUNCTION WITH BUSINESS GOALS, COMPENSATION & PEOPLE
ISSUES |
New Delhi |
20 Lacs $\pm$ |
MBA (HRD) |
40 Yrs. |
15 Yrs. |
1st Aug, 2007 |
|
S. No |
Industry |
Function |
Designation Level (Actual) |
Brief Description |
Posting City |
Approx Salary Offered
(Annual) |
Edu. Qualification (incl.
Branch/Discipline) |
Age (Max) |
Exp (Min) |
Target Date |
|
8 |
Schindler Services |
HR / Hiring |
RECRUITER |
EXECUTIVE SEARCH, SELECTION,
IDENTIFICATION & TAPPING OF TOP TALENT FOR THE WORLD'S LEADING Schindler
SERVICES COMPANY |
New Delhi |
$10$ Lacs $\pm$ |
MBA (HR / IR) |
40 Yrs. |
15 Yrs. |
1st Aug, 2007 |
|
9 |
Pharma |
Operations |
GENERAL MANAGER |
OPERATIONS, SYSTEMS &
PROCESSES OF BULK/R&D, QC/QA, MFG, LAB SERVICES, BULK DRUG &
FORMULATIONS MFG. & $\dots$ |
Mumbai / Bharuch / Baroda /
CT |
25 Lacs $\pm$ |
BE (Chem) / MBA (Operations) |
45 Yrs. |
15 Yrs. |
1st Dec, 2007 |
|
10 |
ADANI |
Finance |
GM - FINANCE |
A/C'S & FINANCE |
Mumbai |
$5$ Lacs $\pm$ |
CA |
55 |
15 Yrs. |
|
|
11 |
**Morarjee Ashish |
Textiles** |
HR / Admin |
MANAGER - ADMIN |
HR / ADMIN |
Mumbai |
$4$ Lacs $\pm$ |
MBA |
45 |
20 |
|
12 |
Parag Milk / S. Securities |
Securities Broker |
CHIEF DEALER |
SECURITIES / DEBT DESK / CHIEF
DEALER |
Mumbai |
$7$ Lacs $\pm$ |
MBA |
30 Yrs. |
7 Yrs. |
|
|
13 |
Universal Gas |
Sales / Mktg. |
GM - S & M |
ICE CREAM INDUSTRY - EXPOSURE
TO SALES & MKTG. |
Mumbai |
$10$ Lacs $\pm$ |
MBA / Graduate BE |
40 Yrs. |
10 Yrs. - 25 Yrs. |
|
|
14 |
Bharat Electronics |
Operations |
DGM - OP |
E.F. CABLE LAYING & MAINT. |
Mumbai |
$12$ Lacs $\pm$ |
B. E. (Telecom) |
35 / 45 Yrs. |
12 Yrs. |
Saleem Applitech will handover
OES "code" within 4/6 weeks.
Using that you can add statements
A / B / C. Pl- add to your
schedule & show me.
Venkat
Megha
Michelle Target Date = Date when resumes sent ?
Manshi
Thakur
Bedekar
Monica
LEGEND
$\left. \begin{array} { l } \text
{ Most Likely } \\ \text { Date } \end{array} \right \}$ Date on by which Appt.
Letter expected to be released
$\left. \begin{array} { l } \text
{ Realization } \\ \text { Date } \end{array} \right \}$ Date by which final
payment expected.
Analysing Pending Assignments
Based on a Consolidated
Statement given to me yesterday by CMT, I have prepared individual
consultant-wise statements. I enclose your statement and request you to
fill-in all the missing details and return to Monica before lunch
today. Keep a photo copy for your ready reference.
To prepare (manually) 7
individual statements from ONE consolidated statement took me 3 hours,
which I could have saved, only if I knew how to use a Computer - I CMT
did offer me a floppy!! But it is too late for me to learn new tricks.
I also enclose some "Analysis
charts (A / B / C).
I hope, I have asked APPLITECH
to incorporate such Analysis (Output statements) in ORDER EXECUTION
SYSTEM.
If not, once again, I have no one
to blame but myself.
If we have missed-out, we will
get these incorporated in the next revision of OES.
It should be possible to see /
view such analysis (on the Screen) at any time - dynamically
generated.
Analysis A
Tells us, who is the most
important client (in terms of total est. billing) AT THE MOMENT.
If 20% of the clients give
us 80% of total "business", then they deserve
very special attention & SERVICE
too!
Concerned Consultant / s
need to make a phone-call to such Clients DAILY, ( and visit once in 15
days ?)
Analysis B
Not only tells us "How
many" assignments are pending with each consultant" but it also
tells us about the QUALITY of assignments Viz:
Is a particular consultant
handling
- few, but "high billing"
assignments
- many, but "low billing" "
Analysis C
How sharply "focussed"
or "diffused" are the consultants?
One Consultant may be handling
20 assignments spread between
just 2 clients
Whereas
another Consultant may be
handling 10 assignments spread amongst 8 clients. (Spreading yourself thin).
Of course, equitable distribution
of work-load amongst Consultants is an important factor.
Then there is the question of a Consultant's
own background experience / expertise in handling assignments from a
- particular INDUSTRY
- "** FUNCTION**
- "** DESIG. LEVEL**
or even ability to
"handle" a particular HR Manager (in a particular COMPANY) based on
"rapport" developed.
As far as a client is concerned,
I suppose, he would be happier
dealing with just ONE consultant of 3P for all of his Vacancies.
Imagine, that for 5 of his
Vacancies, he has to deal with 5 different Consultants!
A happy / satisfied Client
will return to us again & again. It is much easier to "retain"
an old client as compared to "hooking" a new client.
But if same Consultant
deals with a given client (solely) year-after-year, problem may arise,
when that Consultant leaves us & joins a Competitor!
So a "compromise"
in inescapable.
cc: All Consultants
(Individually)
cc: Nirmit.
CLIENT-WISE (A-B-C) ANALYSIS of
Assignments (As on 15/03/01)
(In descending order of total
est. billing) (A)
|
S/No |
Client |
Total No. of Assign-ments |
Total Est. Billing
(Descending) |
Total Adv. Recd. |
Average Billing per Search |
% of total Billing |
|
Total |
101 |
CONSULTANT-WISE ANALYSIS
of PENDING ASSIGNMENTS (As on 15/03/01) (B)
|
Consultant |
No. of Assign-ments on hand |
Total Est. Billing |
Total Advance Received |
Est. Billing / Appointment |
No. of Clients |
|
Highest |
Lowest |
||||
|
Venkat |
4 |
||||
|
Megha |
5 |
||||
|
Mitchelle |
15 |
||||
|
Manshi |
17 |
||||
|
Thakur |
17 |
||||
|
Bedekar |
17 |
||||
|
Monica |
25 |
||||
|
TOTAL |
100 |
CONSULTANT-WISE FOCUS
C (SPAN OF ATTENTION)
|
Q: what should be focus? |
Consultant? |
Client? |
Functional specialization? |
||||||
|
Consultant |
Total No. of Assign-ments |
Grasim (12) |
Bharti Telecom (10) |
Tata ISP (15) |
Bombay Dyeing (9) |
RPG Group (14) |
121 Media Group (5) |
L&T (6) |
Mobilad (7) |
|
Venkat |
4 |
||||||||
|
Megha |
5 |
||||||||
|
Mitchelle |
15 |
||||||||
|
Manshi |
17 |
||||||||
|
Thakur |
17 |
||||||||
|
Bedekar |
17 |
||||||||
|
Monica |
25 |
||||||||
|
Total |
100 |
To
- All Consultants
- Sanjeev / Robin
- Abhi / Reena
- Saleem
- Nirmit
24-07-01
I enclose herewith
- 3 graphs
- 1 Tabulation
In the tabulation, column
# 1 / 3 / 5 are blank. Consultants may fill these up (for
their part of the business) and also give these figs to Nirmit, who
can enter all figs on one sheet (C consolidate) for discussion /
action-plan on next Saturday's meeting.
These figures speak for
themselves and there is no need to stress that the situation, instead of
improving in July (as indicated by the consultants earlier this month),
seems to have worsened!
If any consultant has problem of
insufficient ORDER-BACKLOG, she should feel free to talk to AMB /
Venkat / Nirmit. However, this does not seem to be the case.
Regds.
This file is a Status - Review
of Business table dated 23-7-2001.
|
Consultant ↓ |
OES Est. Billing Value of
all Pending orders |
Venkat's Print-Out: Est.
Billing of Contracts in a Pipeline |
OES Customer Outstanding
(Cons. Wise) |
Concerned Person Revised
Target up to July |
Srilekha Actually Collected
up to 23 July |
|
VENU |
4.58 |
0.8 |
|||
|
PRATISHA |
1.00 |
1.75 |
|||
|
MITCHELLE |
0? |
3.0 |
|||
|
MEGHA |
5.50 |
1.72 |
|||
|
VENKAT |
7.50 |
7.75 |
|||
|
USHA |
2.66 |
0.80 |
|||
|
MANASHI |
2.40 |
2.0 |
|||
|
AMB |
8.33 |
5.0 |
|||
|
MONICA |
0.24 |
||||
|
JYOTI |
1.00 |
||||
|
Sub-Total (CRs.L) |
31.97 |
24.06 |
5.49 |
||
|
NIRMIT |
16.05 |
||||
|
Grand Total (CRs.L) |
48.02 |
||||
|
TABULATION |
Consultant VENU Collections
Graph
Title: CONSULTANT: VENU,
YEAR: 2001-2002, COLLECTIONS
This is a cumulative collection
graph where the X-axis represents months (A-M) and the Y-axis represents
collection amount (in Cr. L) up to 15.
|
Line |
Month |
Cumulative Collection (Cr.
L) |
|
1st Q ACTUAL |
June |
3.11 |
|
2nd Q. REVISED TARGET |
July |
0.8 |
|
2nd Q. REVISED TARGET |
Aug |
4.8 |
|
2nd Q. REVISED TARGET |
Sept |
6.22 |
|
ORIGINAL TARGET |
Dec |
9.33 |
|
ORIGINAL TARGET |
Mar |
12.5 |
Consultant MITCHELLE
Collections Graph
Title: CONSULTANT:
MITCHELLE, YEAR: 2001-2002, COLLECTIONS
This is a cumulative collection
graph where the X-axis represents months (A-M) and the Y-axis represents
collection amount (in Cr. L) up to 20.
|
Line |
Month |
Cumulative Collection (Cr.
L) |
|
1st Q ACTUAL |
June |
5 |
|
2nd Q REVISED TARGET |
July |
3 |
|
2nd Q REVISED TARGET |
Aug |
7 |
|
2nd Q REVISED TARGET |
Sept |
10 |
|
Original Target |
Dec |
15 |
|
Original Target |
Mar |
20 |
Consultant USHA Collections
Graph
Title: CONSULTANT: USHA,
YEAR: 2001-2002, COLLECTIONS
This is a cumulative collection
graph where the X-axis represents months (A-M) and the Y-axis represents
collection amount (in Cr. L) up to 30.
|
Line |
Month |
Cumulative Collection (Cr.
L) |
|
Actual |
Apr |
0.6 |
|
Actual |
May |
1.3 |
|
Actual |
June |
2 |
|
Actual |
July |
0.8 |
|
2nd Q. REVISED TARGET |
Aug |
5.8 |
|
2nd Q. REVISED TARGET |
Sept |
11.8 |
|
Original Target |
July |
6 |
|
Original Target |
Aug |
10 |
|
Original Target |
Sept |
14 |
|
Original Target |
Oct |
16 |
|
Original Target |
Nov |
19 |
|
Original Target |
Dec |
22 |
|
Original Target |
Jan |
24 |
|
Original Target |
Feb |
27 |
|
Original Target |
Mar |
30 |
Consultant MONICA Collections
Graph
Title: CONSULTANT: MONICA,
YEAR: 2001-2002, COLLECTIONS
This is a cumulative collection
graph where the X-axis represents months (A-M) and the Y-axis represents
collection amount (in Cr. L) up to 10.
|
Line |
Month |
Cumulative Collection (Cr.
L) |
|
Actual |
July |
0.24 |
|
2nd Q. REVISED TARGET |
Aug |
1.24 |
|
2nd Q. REVISED TARGET |
Sept |
3.2 |
|
Original Target |
Dec |
6 |
|
Original Target |
Mar |
9 |
Consultant MEGHA Collections
Graph
Title: CONSULTANT: MEGHA,
YEAR: 2001-2002, COLLECTIONS
This is a cumulative collection
graph where the X-axis represents months (A-M) and the Y-axis represents
collection amount (in Cr. L) up to 15.
|
Line |
Month |
Cumulative Collection (Cr.
L) |
|
1st Q. ACTUAL |
June |
2.76 |
|
1st Q. ACTUAL |
July |
0.97 |
|
2nd Q. REVISED TARGET |
July |
1.7 |
|
2nd Q. REVISED TARGET |
Aug |
2.92 |
|
2nd Q. REVISED TARGET |
Sept |
5.5 |
|
Original Target |
Dec |
8.28 |
|
Original Target |
Mar |
11 |
Entire Organization
Collections Graph
Title: COLLECTIONS /
2001-2002, ENTIRE ORGANIZATION
This is a cumulative collection
graph where the X-axis represents months (A-M) and the Y-axis represents
collection amount (in Cr. L) up to 190.
|
Line |
Month |
Cumulative Collection (Cr.
L) |
|
1 Q Actual Achieved |
May |
13.5 |
|
1 Q Actual Achieved |
June |
30.4 |
|
REVISED 2nd Q TARGET |
July |
24 |
|
REVISED 2nd Q TARGET |
Aug |
55 |
|
REVISED 2nd Q TARGET |
Sept |
80.4 |
|
Original Target |
Dec |
133 |
|
Original Target |
Mar |
184 |
Cumulative Collection Targets
Table
This file is a table of CUMULATIVE
COLLECTION TARGETS - ENTIRE ORGANISATION (2001-2002), dated 12-7-01.
(T = Target, A = Actual)
|
Annual Target |
Sl No. |
CONSULTANT |
April |
May |
June |
1 Q Total |
July |
Aug |
Sept |
2 Q Total |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
3 Q Total |
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
4 Q Total |
|
|
12.5 |
1 |
VENU |
T |
3.11 |
3.11 |
0.80 |
4.8 |
6.22 |
6.22 |
||||||||||
|
A |
0.8 |
||||||||||||||||||
|
12.0 |
2 |
PRATIBHA |
T |
2.0 |
2.0 |
1.75 |
3.5 |
5.0 |
5.0 |
||||||||||
|
A |
0.04 |
0.04 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
20.0 |
3 |
MITCHELLE |
T |
5.0 |
5.0 |
3.0 |
7.0 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
||||||||||
|
A |
1.0 |
||||||||||||||||||
|
11.0 |
4 |
MEGHA |
T |
2.76 |
2.76 |
1.72 |
2.92 |
5.52 |
5.52 |
||||||||||
|
A |
0.97 |
||||||||||||||||||
|
42.0 |
5 |
VENKAT |
T |
10.5 |
10.5 |
7.75 |
14.35 |
21.0 |
21.0 |
||||||||||
|
A |
4.5 |
||||||||||||||||||
|
30.0 |
6 |
USHA |
T |
2.0 |
2.0 |
0.8 |
5.8 |
11.8 |
11.8 |
||||||||||
|
A |
0.8 |
||||||||||||||||||
|
12.0 |
7 |
MANASHI |
T |
3.0 |
3.0 |
2.0 |
6.0 |
9.0 |
9.0 |
||||||||||
|
A |
1.65 |
||||||||||||||||||
|
32.0 |
8 |
BEDEKAR |
T |
2.0 |
2.0 |
5.0 |
7.5 |
10.5 |
10.5 |
||||||||||
|
A |
4.5 |
||||||||||||||||||
|
9.0 |
9 |
MONICA |
T |
0.24 |
1.24 |
3.2 |
3.2 |
||||||||||||
|
A |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
9.0 |
10 |
JYOTI |
T |
1.0 |
2.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
||||||||||||
|
A |
- |
||||||||||||||||||
|
189.5 |
TOTAL |
T |
30.37 |
30.37 |
24.06 |
55.11 |
85.24 |
85.24 |
|||||||||||
|
A |
13.46 |
||||||||||||||||||
|
NIRMIT |
T |
||||||||||||||||||
|
A |
New Order-Booking Planning
Worksheet
This file is a worksheet for NEW
ORDER-BOOKING PLANNING WORK-SHEET CONSULTANT with the heading: INVOICE-FIGURES
- NOT "COLLECTION" FIGURES. It is dated 14/07/01.
|
ITEM |
1st Q Target |
2nd Q Revised Target → |
3rd Q Revised Target → |
4th Q Revised Target → |
|
ITEM |
Ap |
May |
June |
July |
|
Collection Target original |
||||
|
Order Backlog on beginning of
month Less $(-)$ |
||||
|
Month's Invoicing Target
(Revised) Equals $(=)$ |
||||
|
Next month's expected opening
Backlog |
||||
|
However, Opening Backlog for
next month has to be equal to next 3 month's targeted Invoicing |
||||
|
Requiring New orders to be
booked during the course of the Month |
||||
|
Actual Orders Booked |
||||
|
Actual Invoicing |
Memo
This file is a handwritten memo
dated 24-07-01.
TO
- All Consultants
- Sanjeev / Robin
- Abhi / Recha
- Saleem
- Nirmit
I enclose herewith
- 3 Graphs
- 1 Tabulation
In the tabulation, column # 1
/ 3 / 5 are blank. Consultants may fill these up (for their part of
the business) and also give these figs to Nirmit, who can enter all figs
on one sheet (Consolidate) for discussion/action plan on next Saturday's
meeting.
These figures speak for
themselves and there is no need to stress that the situation, instead of
improving in July (as indicated by the consultants earlier this month), seems
to have worsened!
If any consultant has problem of
insufficient ORDER-BACKLOG, she should feel free to talk to AMB /
Venkat / Nirmit. However, this does not seem to be the case.
Regds.
(Signature)
Shopping Baskets Graph
Title: NO. OF SHOPPING – BASKETS
SUBMITTED ON OUR WEBSITE
Date: 24-07-01
NOTE
- Total of 178 Shopping Baskets in 13 months (June
2000 – June 2001)
- 10 so far in July 2001
- If each SB could mean a billing of Rs. $1.00 \text{
L}$ (@ $12.5\%$) against our "OFFLINE" ave-billing (vac. of Rs.
$1.5 \text{ L}$ ?)
- If only $50\%$ got converted into
"order"
- This, would mean a (lost) business of Rs. 89
LAKHS!
MORAL OF THE STORY
Unless "Proposal" goes
within 24 hours (Sanjeev), this client is unlikely to ever return to our
website for Resume-Search.
|
Month |
Year |
No. of Shopping Baskets |
|
June |
2000 |
8 |
|
July |
2000 |
3 |
|
Aug |
2000 |
2 |
|
Sept |
2000 |
2 |
|
Oct |
2000 |
12 |
|
Nov |
2000 |
11 |
|
Dec |
2000 |
18 |
|
Jan |
2001 |
17 |
|
Feb |
2001 |
18 |
|
Mar |
2001 |
28 |
|
Apr |
2001 |
35 (Approx.) |
|
May |
2001 |
55 |
|
June |
2001 |
17 |
Job Adverts Graph
Title: NO. OF JOB-ADVTS DIRECTLY
POSTED ON OUR WEBSITE (INCLUDING HOT JOB ADVTS)
Date: 24-07-01
NOTE
Candidates only visit those
websites which have plenty of job-advts!
|
Month |
Year |
No. of Job Adverts |
|
June |
2000 |
23 |
|
July |
2000 |
25 |
|
Aug |
2000 |
37 |
|
Sept |
2000 |
17 |
|
Oct |
2000 |
22 |
|
Nov |
2000 |
59 |
|
Dec |
2000 |
0 |
|
Jan |
2001 |
48 |
|
Feb |
2001 |
41 |
|
Mar |
2001 |
50 |
|
Apr |
2001 |
64 |
|
May |
2001 |
97 |
|
June |
2001 |
85 |
Resumes Received Graph
Title: NO. OF RESUMES (WEB-FORMS)
RECD. ON OUR WEBSITE
Date: 24-07-01
NOTE
Compare our figures with
- Jobstreet (claim of) - 1000 resumes/Day
- Monster (” ”) - 30,000 ”
|
Month |
Year |
No. of Resumes Received |
Note |
|
June |
2000 |
326 |
NT V.1 |
|
July |
2000 |
229 |
|
|
Aug |
2000 |
323 |
|
|
Sept |
2000 |
383 |
|
|
Oct |
2000 |
604 |
NT V.2 |
|
Nov |
2000 |
789 |
|
|
Dec |
2000 |
654 |
|
|
Jan |
2001 |
960 |
|
|
Feb |
2001 |
903 |
|
|
Mar |
2001 |
864 |
|
|
Apr |
2001 |
1219 |
|
|
May |
2001 |
750 |
NT V.3 |
|
June |
2001 |
900 |
Status Review Table (Duplicate
of 0141)
STATUS – REVIEW OF BUSINESS ON
23-7-2001
|
Consultant ↓ |
OES Est. Billing Value of
all pending orders |
Venkat's Print-Out: Est.
Billing of Candidates "in Pipeline" |
OES Customer Outstandings
(Cons. wise) |
Concerned Person Revised
Collection Target up to July |
Srilekha Actually Collected
up to 23 July |
|
VENU |
4.58 |
0.8 |
|||
|
PRATIBHA |
1.00 |
1.75 |
|||
|
MITCHELLE |
0? |
3.0 |
|||
|
MEGHA |
5.50 |
1.72 |
|||
|
VENKAT |
7.50 |
7.75 |
|||
|
USHA |
2.66 |
0.80 |
|||
|
MANSHI |
2.40 |
2.0 |
|||
|
AMB |
8.33 |
5.0 |
|||
|
MONICA |
0.24 |
||||
|
JYOTI |
1.00 |
||||
|
Sub-Total (Rs. L) |
31.97 |
24.06 |
5.49 |
||
|
Nirmit |
16.05 |
||||
|
Grand Total (Rs. L) |
48.02 |
||||
|
TABULATION |
Memo on Job Adverts Deletion
TO:
Abhi
Sanjeev
Robin
Saleem
Date: 24/07/01
I enclose two annex. compiled
from our website today morning.
2 days back Abhi told me that he
has deleted all Job Advt from 1/1/2000 To 31/12/2000 (entire year
2000) & that brought the counter (on homepage) down by only about approx. 300
/ 400 advt!
Apparently what Server has done
is to delete the REAL job-advts. posted by Corpo. on our website from Mar
2000 To Dec. 2000 (approx: 321 // see annex A).
The server has NOT deleted
2031 ($1114 + 917$) job advt IMPORTED into NT site at one go (by
Britam) from UNIX site !! These must belong to year 1999. Pl. find a way
to delete this & then delete.
Regards,
(Signature)
cc: Harshad (VXceed) for Sept
24/7/01
Data from Admin Tool (Annex A)
Annex (A)
Data Taken from Admin Tool
Job Advt. Arrival Summary
2001 (NO. Recd during Month)
|
Month |
NO. (Recd during Month) |
|
Jan 2001 |
49 |
|
Feb |
41 |
|
Mar |
50 |
|
Apr |
64 |
|
May |
105 |
|
June |
86 |
|
July (till 23) |
38 |
|
Total |
433 |
|
Month |
2000 |
1999 |
Notes |
|
Jan 2000 |
$\text{V. 1.1} \quad 1114$ |
0 |
Imported from UNIX to NT by
Britam? |
|
Feb |
$\text{V. 1.1} \quad 917$ |
0 |
|
|
Mar |
114 |
0 |
|
|
April |
0 |
0 |
|
|
May |
$\text{V. 2.0} \quad 19$ |
0 |
|
|
June |
24 |
0 |
|
|
July |
26 |
0 |
|
|
Aug |
37 |
0 |
REAL job-advts directly posted
by Corpo. once V.1 (NT) was launched? |
|
Sept |
18 |
0 |
|
|
Oct |
24 |
4 |
|
|
Nov |
59 |
0 |
|
|
Dec |
0 |
0 |
|
|
Total |
2352 |
4 |
(Note: $\text{2031}^{*}$ on the
chart is the sum of $1114 + 917$. $\text{321}$ circled is the sum of 114 + 0 +
19 + 24 + 26 + 37 + 18 + 24 + 59 + 0 = 321 - wait, $321$ is circled near $26$
(July 2000). The sum of March to December 2000 is $114+0+19+24+26+37+18+24+59+0
= 321$. This confirms the note in Scan_0155.jpg.)
Data from 3P Logfiles (Annex
B)
Annex (B)
Data taken from 3P logfiles
"3P" as an AFFILIATE
MONTHLY STATISTICS
(Note: All figures for July 2001
are "Upto July $23^{\text{rd}}$ only.")
|
Month |
Resume |
Job Advt. |
Shop. Basket |
|
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
|
|
Jan |
960 |
||
|
Feb |
3 |
1814 |
903 |
|
Mar |
- |
- |
864 |
|
Apr |
- |
2699 |
1219 |
|
May |
$\text{V.1}$ |
$1521^{*}$ |
$\text{V.3} \quad 750$ |
|
June |
- |
326 |
900 |
|
July |
294 |
229 |
$\text{V.4} \quad 629$ |
|
Aug |
564 |
323 |
|
|
Sept |
530 |
383 |
|
|
Oct |
412 |
$\text{V.2} \quad 604$ |
|
|
Nov |
371 |
789 |
|
|
Dec |
129 |
654 |
|
|
Total |
2300 |
23468 |
6225 |
($^{*}$ $1521$ is circled, $10$
for July 2001 Shop. Basket is circled.)
Minutes of Meeting
Sent 18/7/01 (Top Right - faint)
Minutes of Meeting held on
14-07-01
POLICY MATTERS
- NHP / AMB / V.I. will be responsible for getting
orders (business development). Of course, they will continue to be
responsible for executing assignments entrusted to them.
- On a case-to-case basis, they would request one of
the other consultants to accompany them, when they visit a client for
presentation/negotiations etc.
- As far as "offline" business is
concerned, the whole idea is to be pro-active and not wait for a client /
potential client to call-up.
- To the extent possible, only one consultant should
deal with a client.
- As far as 3P is concerned, only one
consultant should act as an interface with a client. In case of multiple
assignments from same client, it may happen that these (assignments) get
distributed amongst several of our consultants (depending upon their
industry / function exposure etc). Even in such cases, interface should
be only ONE.
- As far as possible, such cases should [continue to
next page]
- be avoided (where assignments of one client
requires to be distributed).
Retainer / Min Search Fees
- To the extent possible, we should avoid
taking/accepting orders without retainer/min search fees.
- An exception can be made, on case-to-case basis,
depending upon our knowledge/past experience/future business
potential/prestige-issue etc. etc.
Professional Fees
These will be as follows:
(A) For directly posted Job Advts
by client on our website: $8.33\%$
- This will only cover "Candidate-Alert"
resumes & resumes where candidates have used our automatic
resume-forwarding service.
- This WILL NOT cover, any other resumes which, on
our own, we recommend. AMB to be consulted as to what we should
"quote" in such cases.
- Since, at present, we have no means/tool to know
which (PEN) candidate-alerts have been sent to the advertiser OR
which candidates forwarded their resumes using our Resume Forwarding
service, we will have to entirely depend upon the advertiser himself to
give us the PEN of such candidates (we are planning to introduce such a
tool on our website, which will keep track of this).
- In all of these cases, we are not
required/obliged/expected to see/interview such candidates.
- All consultants should carefully go through the TERMS
on
- Job Advt. Posting pages
- Resume Search pages.
(B) Where Client Conducts Online
Resume Search & sends us Shopping Basket: $12.5\%$
- In this case, once our "proposal" gets
accepted by the clients, we are supposed to "Interview"
the Candidates which are jointly shortlisted by the Client & the
Consultant across the table (desirable) and send our "Interview
Evaluation sheets" to the client, containing our "recommendations".
Offline Business Models
OFFLINE
(C) Offline Inquiries
resulting into Databank (Module 1) search/short
listing/interviewing/recommendation: $16.6\%$
(D) Offline Inquiries
resulting into "headhunting" of executives (mostly GM and
above) from a select no. of industries/companies: $20.0\%$
This will involve "in-depth"
interviewing/assessment by Nirmit/AMB/VI or outside "Ext Subject
Experts"
In cases of OFFLINE, it
would be advisable to consult Nirmit/AMB/VI before sending proposal.
It is absolutely imperative that no
proposal should go outside of OES.
Website related Problems
- If Consultants are facing any website related
problems or want to better understand how a particular
feature/function works, they should consult Nirmit/Sanjeev/Abhi/Saleem
(in that order).
- Even if Saleem is unable to solve problem/give
satisfactory reply, he will contact somebody in Vxceed & get back with
an answer/solution.
- Henceforth, to the extent possible, our "interface"
with Vxceed should be only Saleem. Of course, Abhi would
continue to deal with Vxceed as far as web-server hosting related
problems are concerned (—and keep Saleem informed).
- However, all Consultants must thoroughly "master"
the working of our website. If one of their Client (HR manager)
inquires as to how a particular feature works on our website, a Consultant
would make a very poor impression if he/she says,
"Hold it! Let me consult my
colleague and I will get back to you in the afternoon."
2nd Qtr. Collection Targets
$2^{\text{nd}}$ Qtr.
Collection Targets
- All Consultants have committed, revised
Collection targets for $2^{\text{nd}}$ Qtr (taking into account the
shortfall of $1^{\text{st}}$ Qtr).
- It is imperative that these targets are
achieved at all costs. If we fail to achieve individual & collective
targets, we would be in deep trouble and face severe
consequences.
- Fortunately, all consultants have plenty of ORDER
BACKLOG and also have the full power of OES at their command.
All we need is hard – and smart – work, to accomplish
our individual targets.
- In a shrinking job-market, the only way we
can get more business, is thru executing existing/current assignments
SPEEDILY and to the entire satisfaction of our clients. For
this, we must use OES & Module 1, to the fullest extent. Anyone
facing any difficulty in this regard, must immediately bring it to Venkat's
notice.
- When we meet next on $21^{\text{st}}$ inst, for our
weekly meeting, all Consultants must present their individual, actual "collection"
for the month of July – as against their revised July targets.
Procedural Matters
PROCEDURAL MATTERS
- Consultants should pro-actively help clients
in the process of "shortlisting" of candidates. To the
extent possible (—and limited to Mumbai-based clients, to begin
with), Consultants should carry the resumes of the shortlisted candidates,
sit across HR manager's table and help him decide who he
should call for interviews.
- On such an occasion, a consultant would
- get to know a Client's requirement much more
thoroughly and thereby recommend truly "suitable"
candidates.
- be able to "influence the HR manager &
establish a "rapport" with him.
- be able to solicit some more business from HR
manager, by discovering his future manpower needs.
- Such face-to-face meetings will also tend to speed-up
the entire recruitment cycle.
Module 1 Search and Databases
- All Consultants should aggressively search
of Module 1 executive database – including NON-MEMBER database,
which numbers close to 60,000 executives! Abhi to circulate this
list amongst all consultants.
Databases Individually
Compiled
- During last 1 year or so, each Consultant has
worked on several assignments and compiled independent databases of "headhunted"
executives.
- All these databases should be immediately handed
over to Robin, whose responsibility would be to ensure that
all of these get entered into the NON-MEMBER area of Module 1,
so that all such databases become searchable in Module 1, by all
Consultants.
- When done, Abhi to circulate this list to all
Consultants (Target $25^{\text{th}}$ July).
- Robin to report progress on this matter when
we meet on $21^{\text{st}}$ inst (next Saturday).
Proposals against Shopping
Baskets
- It will be the responsibility of Sanjeev to
enter all Shopping Baskets into OES and send out proposals
(thru OES ONLY) against each.
- Sanjeev must also follow up aggressively
till client decides, one way or other.
- If client "rejects" our proposal
(for whatever reason), it is Sanjeev's responsibility to carry out "Force-closure"
in OES.
- If client "accepts" our proposal, Sanjeev
to get Nirmit/AMB/VI, to "allot" that particular SON
(Shopping Order Number), to a particular consultant.
- From this point onwards, Concerned Consultant
will take-over that assignment and handle it till its successful Completion.
- All proposals against a shopping Basket must be
dispatched (thru OES) within 24 hours at most. By
$21^{\text{st}}$ inst, Sanjeev to enter all 194 Shopping Baskets
into OES and report at the weekly Saturday meeting. Any problems
must be referred to Venkat.
- As far as proposals that are required to be sent
against "Offline" inquiries are concerned, it [will be
the responsibility of the Concerned consultant - continues on next page]
Offline Inquiries Role
will be the responsibility of the
Concerned consultant, who is handling that particular assignment.
Sanjeev would have no
role to play as far as "Offline Inquiries" are concerned.
As far as OFFLINE INQUIRIES
are concerned (fax/email/phone calls), Sanjeev's role will be as
follows:
- Look-up the inquiry/attend to the phone calls from
potential clients.
- In case of phone-call inquiry, note down all
details (of client company/contact person/requirement etc).
- Consult Nirmit/AMB/VI re: allotting to a
particular Consultant.
- Phone-up (or email) the client and tell him, who
(which consultant) from our side will attend to this inquiry and how soon
can he expect to receive our proposal.
- Get a Concerned Consultant to enter the
inquiry into OES and ensure that a proposal gets dispatched within 24
hours.
Email
All staff Members: July 4,
2001
Survival of the Fittest
In his book, "Theory of
Evolution" Charles Darwin spoke about survival of the fittest.
And who is fittest?
Those species (of animals) which quickly
adapted themselves to the changing global climate, managed to survive.
Those which could not, became extinct.
Darwin's rule applies equally
well to business-species and business-climate. This has been so
since Industrial Revolution of early 1800s. It is even more so,
since globalization and arrival of internet-economy around 1995.
Executive Search firms (like
ours) are no exception to this rule.
From 1990 till 1997, we were an Offline,
brick-and-mortar company, having a local geographical reach. In 1997 we
went Online, with setting-up of our website. But we did not give-up our offline
business model.
For us, our website was an "enabling"
device. It enabled us to, [continues on next page]
Email - Evolution of the
Website (Page 2)
- Receive resumes online in a structured
database and permitted online recruiters to conduct resume-search
& send us their Shopping Basket.
- Receive job-advts online in a structured
database and permitted online jobseekers to conduct a job-search.
Earlier, in UNIX server,
we revealed identity of job-advertisers and the jobseekers could apply
directly.
From May 2000 (NT V 1.0),
we do not reveal advertiser's identity and the jobseeker cannot apply
directly. He has to go thru us only.
But several hundred Indian
jobsites which made their appearance on Internet subsequently, adopted a totally
different approach.
They charged
- jobseekers for posting a resume (for a given
period)
- recruiters for posting a job-advt (again for
a given period)
- recruiters for conducting online resume-search
(for a monthly/quarterly or annual subscription).
Email - Jobsites Business
Model (Page 3)
- None of the jobsites charged jobseekers anything
for conducting an online search of their jobs database.
- This business model (—and therefore, revenue-model)
was no different than a newspaper selling the content and space.
Anybody could see the content and take any action (independent of
the newspaper i.e. without any further involvement of the concerned
newspaper).
- The jobsites were selling "Electronic Media
Space".
- Jobseekers could apply directly (to any
advertiser) and the recruiter can shortlist any resume and contact
the candidate directly.
- Some jobsites gave jobseekers, an option to keep
their resume "private", meaning contact info was not
revealed to the online recruiter, but the jobsite passed-on a
message to the concerned jobseeker (about having been shortlisted by
XYZ), and if he agreed, then his resume contact info was made
available to the recruiter.
- This was a minor variation, but their basic
business model/revenue model, remained same viz: Sale of electronic
media space.
Status Review Table
(23-7-2001)
|
Source of Information → |
OES Est. Billing Value of
all Pending orders |
Venkat's Print-Out: Est.
Billing of Candidates "in Pipeline" |
OES Customer Outstandings
(Cons. Wise) |
Concerned Person Revised
Collection Target up to July |
Srilekha Actually Collected
up to 23 July |
|
Consultant $ |
|||||
|
VENU |
4.58 |
0.8 |
|||
|
PRATISHA |
1.00 |
1.75 |
|||
|
MITCHELLE |
0? |
3.0 |
|||
|
MEGHA |
5.50 |
1.72 |
|||
|
VENKAT |
7.50 |
7.75 |
|||
|
USHA |
2.66 |
0.80 |
|||
|
MANSHI |
2.40 |
2.0 |
|||
|
AMB |
8.33 |
5.0 |
|||
|
MONICA |
0.24 |
||||
|
JYOTI |
1.00 |
||||
|
Sub-Total (CRs.L) |
31.97 |
24.06 |
5.49 |
||
|
Nirmit |
16.05 |
||||
|
Grand Total (CRs.L) |
48.02 |
||||
|
TABULATION |
Consultant VENU Collections
Graph
Title: CONSULTANT: VENU,
YEAR: 2001-2002, COLLECTIONS
This is a cumulative collection
graph.
|
Line |
Month |
Cumulative Collection (Cr.
L) |
|
1st Q ACTUAL |
June |
3.11 |
|
2nd Q. REVISED TARGETS |
July |
0.8 |
|
2nd Q. REVISED TARGETS |
Aug |
4.8 |
|
2nd Q. REVISED TARGETS |
Sept |
6.22 |
|
ORIGINAL TARGET |
Dec |
9.33 |
|
ORIGINAL TARGET |
Mar |
12.5 |
Consultant MITCHELLE
Collections Graph
Title: CONSULTANT:
MITCHELLE, YEAR: 2001-2002, COLLECTIONS
This is a cumulative collection
graph.
|
Line |
Month |
Cumulative Collection (Cr.
L) |
|
1st Q ACTUAL |
June |
5 |
|
2nd Q REVISED TARGET |
July |
3 |
|
2nd Q REVISED TARGET |
Aug |
7 |
|
2nd Q REVISED TARGET |
Sept |
10 |
|
Original Target |
Dec |
15 |
|
Original Target |
Mar |
20 |
Consultant USHA Collections
Graph
Title: CONSULTANT: USHA,
YEAR: 2001-2002, COLLECTIONS
This is a cumulative collection
graph.
|
Line |
Month |
Cumulative Collection (Cr.
L) |
|
Actual |
Apr |
0.6 |
|
Actual |
May |
1.3 |
|
Actual |
June |
2 |
|
Actual |
July |
0.8 |
|
2nd Q. REVISED TARGET |
Aug |
5.8 |
|
2nd Q. REVISED TARGET |
Sept |
11.8 |
|
Original Target |
Mar |
30 |
Consultant MONICA Collections
Graph
Title: CONSULTANT: MONICA,
YEAR: 2001-2002, COLLECTIONS
This is a cumulative collection
graph.
|
Line |
Month |
Cumulative Collection (Cr.
L) |
|
Actual |
July |
0.24 |
|
2nd Q. REVISED TARGET |
Aug |
1.24 |
|
2nd Q. REVISED TARGET |
Sept |
3.2 |
|
Original Target |
Dec |
6 |
|
Original Target |
Mar |
9 |
Consultant MEGHA Collections
Graph
Title: CONSULTANT: MEGHA,
YEAR: 2001-2002, COLLECTIONS
This is a cumulative collection
graph.
|
Line |
Month |
Cumulative Collection (Cr.
L) |
|
1st Q. ACTUAL |
June |
2.76 |
|
1st Q. ACTUAL |
July |
0.97 |
|
2nd Q. REVISED TARGET |
July |
1.7 |
|
2nd Q. REVISED TARGET |
Aug |
2.9 |
|
2nd Q. REVISED TARGET |
Sept |
5.5 |
|
Original Target |
Dec |
8.28 |
|
Original Target |
Mar |
11 |
Entire Organization
Collections Graph
Title: COLLECTIONS /
2001-2002, ENTIRE ORGANIZATION
This is a cumulative collection
graph.
|
Line |
Month |
Cumulative Collection (Cr.
L) |
|
1 Q Actual Achieved |
May |
13.5 |
|
1 Q Actual Achieved |
June |
30.4 |
|
REVISED 2nd Q TARGET |
July |
24 |
|
REVISED 2nd Q TARGET |
Aug |
55 |
|
REVISED 2nd Q TARGET |
Sept |
80.4 (The graph point is marked
as 85) |
|
Original Target |
Dec |
133 |
|
Original Target |
Mar |
184 |
Cumulative Collection Targets
Table
CUMULATIVE COLLECTION TARGETS
- ENTIRE ORGANISATION (2001-2002), dated 12-7-01. (T = Target, A =
Actual)
|
Annual Target |
Sl No. |
CONSULTANT |
April |
May |
June |
1Q Total |
July |
Aug |
Sept |
2Q Total |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
3Q |
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
4Q |
|
|
12.5 |
1 |
VENU |
T |
3.11 |
3.11 |
0.80 |
4.8 |
6.22 |
6.22 |
||||||||||
|
A |
0.8 |
||||||||||||||||||
|
12.0 |
2 |
PRATIBHA |
T |
2.0 |
2.0 |
1.75 |
3.5 |
5.0 |
5.0 |
||||||||||
|
A |
0.04 |
0.04 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
20.0 |
3 |
MITCHELLE |
T |
5.0 |
5.0 |
3.0 |
7.0 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
||||||||||
|
A |
1.0 |
||||||||||||||||||
|
11.0 |
4 |
MEGHA |
T |
2.76 |
2.76 |
1.72 |
2.92 |
5.52 |
5.52 |
||||||||||
|
A |
0.97 |
||||||||||||||||||
|
42.0 |
5 |
VENKAT |
T |
10.5 |
10.5 |
7.75 |
14.35 |
21.0 |
21.0 |
||||||||||
|
A |
4.5 |
||||||||||||||||||
|
30.0 |
6 |
USHA |
T |
2.0 |
2.0 |
0.8 |
5.8 |
11.8 |
11.8 |
||||||||||
|
A |
0.8 |
||||||||||||||||||
|
12.0 |
7 |
MANASHI |
T |
3.0 |
3.0 |
2.0 |
6.0 |
9.0 |
9.0 |
||||||||||
|
A |
1.65 |
||||||||||||||||||
|
32.0 |
8 |
BEDEKAR |
T |
2.0 |
2.0 |
5.0 |
7.5 |
10.5 |
10.5 |
||||||||||
|
A |
4.5 |
||||||||||||||||||
|
9.0 |
9 |
MONICA |
T |
0.24 |
1.24 |
3.2 |
3.2 |
||||||||||||
|
A |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
9.0 |
10 |
JYOTI |
T |
1.0 |
2.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
||||||||||||
|
A |
- |
||||||||||||||||||
|
189.5 |
TOTAL |
T |
30.37 |
30.37 |
24.06 |
55.11 |
85.24 |
85.24 |
|||||||||||
|
A |
13.46 |
||||||||||||||||||
|
NIRMIT |
T |
||||||||||||||||||
|
A |
New Order-Booking Planning
Worksheet
NEW ORDER-BOOKING PLANNING
WORK-SHEET CONSULTANT
Date: 14/07/01
INVOICE-FIGURES – NOT
"COLLECTION" FIGURES.
|
ITEM |
1st Q Target |
2nd Q Revised Target → |
3rd Q Revised Target → |
4th Q Revised Target → |
|
Ap |
May |
June |
July |
|
|
Collection Target original |
||||
|
Order Backlog on beginning of
month Less $(-)$ |
||||
|
Month's Invoicing Target
(Revised) Equals $(=)$ |
||||
|
Next month's expected opening
Backlog |
||||
|
However, Opening Backlog for
next month has to be equal to next 3 month's targeted Invoicing |
||||
|
Requiring New orders to be
booked during the course of the Month |
||||
|
Actual Orders Booked |
||||
|
Actual Invoicing |
Memo
TO
- All Consultants
- Sanjeev / Robin
- Abhi / Recha
- Saleem
- Nirmit
Date: 24-07-01
I enclose herewith
- 3 Graphs
- 1 Tabulation
In the tabulation, column # 1
/ 3 / 5 are blank. Consultants may fill these up (for their part of
the business) and also give these figs to Nirmit, who can enter all figs
on one sheet (Consolidate) for discussion/action plan on next Saturday's
meeting.
These figures speak for
themselves and there is no need to stress that the situation, instead of
improving in July (as indicated by the consultants earlier this month), seems
to have worsened!
If any consultant has problem of
insufficient ORDER-BACKLOG, she should feel free to talk to AMB /
Venkat / Nirmit. However, this does not seem to be the case.
Regds.
(Signature)
Jobsites Business Model
Evolution (Page 4)
But before long, most of these
websites realised that Surviving on this type of revenue alone was
difficult.
So, some of them added new
features which would enable them to collect some more, feature-wise fees,
from jobseekers and recruiters.
Here are some examples:
- Resume Blasting Service
- Job Alerts / Candidate Alert Service
- LENA / SIVA (in case of jobstreet.com)
Some jobsites went so far as to
set-up physical/local offices to help their online clients in the typical
"Brick-and-mortar" backoffice arrangements!
That means, they started off as a
"pure-play" strictly-online job & resume bulletin-boards
and gradually "morphed" into classical executive-Search
firms.
This is exactly opposite
of what we did.
We started as a down-to-earth,
physically anchored local executive-search firm and then we moved-up to
have an online presence.
Hybrid Business Model Question
(Page 5)
It is now $3\frac{1}{2}$ years,
since we have a website but with one major difference.
In our case, when we moved from
physical to virtual world, we carried with us, the same business-model,
which we have successfully used (—and still continue to use) in the physical
world, viz:
"Do not reveal the
identity/Contact Info. of the jobseekers to the recruiters — and vice versa,
unless the recruiters accept our TERMS."
This was a hybreed model —
and in sharp contrast to prevailing models on all jobsites (viz: selling
electronic media space). This sets apart our website from all the rest.
Question:
Will a model that has worked very
well in the physical world, work equally well in the virtual world?
If we simply go by the evidence
of last $3\frac{1}{2}$ years, the answer would appear to be a NO!
We have no earlier, documented
[continues on next page]
Online Conversion Rate Problem
[Continuation from previous page]
records but let us take a look at
the records of last ONE year.
Since launch of our NT
(website) V 1.0, in May 2000, we have received, close to 184
online Shopping Baskets.
How many of these got converted
into a purchase order?
TWO?
THREE?
Again, we have no record but it
is safe to assume that the number must be insignificant.
Of course, one could argue,
"But all this time, we did
not have an Order Execution System and we did not have one person
solely responsible to send-out a "proposal" against each
shopping basket) within 24 hours and then follow-up vigorously till
either our proposal got accepted or rejected. So no wonder, very few shopping
Baskets got converted into purchase orders. Things should look very
different in next $2/3$ months!"
May be you are right. I certainly
hope so.
Website Investment &
Alliance Program Results (Page 7)
But, in the meantime following
"facts" cannot be denied:
- During last $3\frac{1}{2}$ years, we must
have spent over Rs. 20 lakhs in creation & maintenance
of our website.
- In addition, we have spent enormous amount of
energy & effort & time, trying to get more resumes & more
job-advts (—and of course, more shopping baskets) on our website.
- During last $1\frac{1}{2}$ years, along with
Sayida/Chetan/Chaitali/Sanjeev and Robin, we tried to build-up a
formidable "ALLIANCE / PARTNER PROGRAM", primarily
targeted to get-in many more resumes. We have signed-up
- 359 Computer Institutions (NACT)
- 134 Colleges
- 66 Cybercafes
- 20 Placement Agencies etc etc.
- But, so far, all of these, put together during last
2 years have sent-in, perhaps 1000 resumes!
- The results are totally disproportionate to
the time/effort/money spent.
HR/Recruitment Market Reality
(Page 8)
- More than $95\%$ of our executive-search
assignments continue to come thru "Offline" (fax-email-phone-meetings).
We do not expect that this trend will change dramatically in near future.
- By and large, Indian HR/Recruitment Managers,
continue to be "Computer Illiterate".
- Some $5\%$ who do have a computer on their
tables, do not have an internet connection!
- This scenario is unlikely to change substantially
during the next $3/5$ years.
- Inhouse recruitment activity gives "power
and importance" to a recruitment manager. E-recruitment
will take away this power — hence the resistance! It will take a
long time to breakdown/overcome this resistance.
- With our "hybreed" revenue-model
(which we have migrated to our website), we are trying to "swim
against the tide". This is not going to be easy and is bound to
take a long time.
Financial and Manpower
Constraints (Page 9)
- We do not have deep pockets (Rs. 20 crores of
Venture Capital funding), to undertake a "brand-building
publicity Campaign" to convince/educate the HR Managers
fraternity re: the advantages of our business-model.
- All of the foregoing means that, we take a close
look at
- the internal generation of funds that we
can deploy in further development of our ONLINE presence (i.e. our
website related expenses).
- re-deployment of our existing manpower
(—and of course, womanpower!) resources to maximise internal
generation of funds, in the short term.
- Nirmit tells me that during the $1^{\text{st}}$
Quarter (April-May-June) of this year,
- our income (Collection) has been a mere Rs.
13.46 Lakhs
- (Against a target of Rs. 30 Lakhs)
Alarming Situation and
Strategy Re-orientation (Page 10)
- Our expenses have been Rs. 18 lakhs against
our budgeted expense of Rs. [blank] lakhs.
This situation is alarming!
Unless, we reverse these trends
during July-Aug-Sept and catch-up on our individual and collective
targets, we could be headed for trouble.
Clearly, such a situation calls
for an immediate (—even if temporary), re-orientation of our business
strategy.
In the enclosed pages, I have put
together a broad outline of such re-orientation and hope that all of us will
implement the same with the speed it deserves.
with regards
(Signature)
Business Strategy
Re-orientation - Focus and Implications
Date: July 4, 2001
|
FOCUS |
IMPLICATIONS |
|
1. Concentrate on offline
business opportunities |
WEBSITE |
|
After $3\frac{1}{2}$ years of
efforts/expenses, our online presence (i.e. our website), has failed to
generate enough business (search assignments). Currently $95\%$ of our
business comes offline & is likely to remain so, in the
foreseeable future. |
Suspend all further expenses on
adding new features/functionalities on the website (e.g. V-4.0) |
|
Whatever minor corrections/improvements
are needed on website, to be done by our own inhouse team. (See list
D-to be prioritized) |
|
|
Gradually take-over all
website maintenance from Vxceed. |
|
|
Get estimate from Vxceed for
"tweaking" our website for perfect viewing on Videocon TV
& then decide, whether to go ahead. |
|
|
Resume Forwarding Service
using Videocon's ITV |
|
|
To be implemented only if
Cost is borne by Videocon |
|
|
Introduction of any new
forms/features (e.g. In order to partner with E-Convergence
Technologies of Mr. Bhasker |
Business Strategy
Re-orientation - Focus and Implications (Part 2)
|
FOCUS |
IMPLICATIONS |
|
We will not introduce these
unless entire expense is borne by Mr. Bhasker. |
|
|
Local hosting |
|
|
Compare costs (monthly fees) on
apple-for-apple basis, between Verio, and Asraan frontiers
& then decide. |
Business Strategy
Re-orientation - Alliance Programs
|
FOCUS |
IMPLICATIONS |
|
ALLIANCE PROGRAMS |
No more introduction of new
programs/alliances |
|
After struggling for more than
$1\frac{1}{2}$ years, these programs have failed to generate sufficient quantity
& quality of RESUMES (—and shopping Baskets, too, in case of
partner websites) |
No more effort to enlarge
(rope-in more members), the existing programs. |
|
Convert existing program "registration"
from offline to online (& automatic) as in case of Partner
websites (V 3.0), so that no manual effort is required to
register/admit new members. |
|
|
Bare minimum offline effort
to support/sustain existing members of existing programs. |
|
|
Offline Resume Entry CDs
to be sent to Placement Agencies who register online. |
|
|
As far as Colleges &
Comp. Institutes (NACT) are concerned, not to send CD, unless
specifically requested. |
|
|
As far as Cybercafes are
concerned, offline effort to be restricted to tying-up large "chains"
only (i-way/Indya.com/BSNL etc) |
Business Strategy
Re-orientation - Quality of Resumes
|
FOCUS |
IMPLICATIONS |
|
QUALITY of RESUMES |
Get one person to focus on
compiling basic details (Name/designation level/function/Employer company) of
SENIOR EXECUTIVES using sources, such as: |
|
Shift focus to getting fewer
but high quality resumes of SENIOR EXECUTIVES (below 45 years of age)
working with organised sector (Public Ltd. Companies) |
- Newspapers / Magazines |
|
- Directories of Prof.
Associations |
|
|
- Trade Body Directories |
|
|
- Internal Phone Directories of
Co's. |
|
|
- Annual Reports |
|
|
- Holders of Credit cards |
|
|
- Users of Mobile Phones |
|
|
- MTNL Phone Directory. |
|
|
- Kapadia (ex-CMIE) etc. |
|
|
This database should be
compiled for "Industries/Functions" which are in great
demand currently or expected to "boom" in near future (e.g.
Insurance / Telecom). |
|
|
Database should be UNIFIED
& systematically entered either in MODULE 1 or in OES (if
there is provision) |
|
|
Consider "Phoning In"
of unstructured resumes by SENIOR EXECUTIVES (using IVRS). They
don't want to sit down & write/type a resume but are used to, DICTATING!
—which comes to them, naturally. |
Business Strategy
Re-orientation - Customer Support
|
FOCUS |
IMPLICATIONS |
|
CUSTOMER SUPPORT |
A full time person to be
responsible for this |
|
This is one of our weakness
area. We have been slow in responding to complaints/requests, either from |
He/she should be |
|
- Corporates |
- knowledgeable about all of
our Online & Offline business processes (i.e. website + OES) |
|
- Clients |
- good/fluent in spoken english |
|
- Member Candidates |
- courteous / warm on phone |
|
- Jobseekers trying to use one
of our ONLINE services etc etc. |
- having helpful attitude |
|
Quite often our poor response
is due to |
- having good memory &
record-keeping habits |
|
Not designating one person as
totally responsible for this function |
- good "follow-up"
habits (keep his promises at all costs) |
|
Lack of knowledge of how our
website works |
Business Strategy
Re-orientation - Job Advts on Website
|
FOCUS |
IMPLICATIONS |
|
JOB-ADVTS ON OUR WEBSITE |
Delete all job advts which are
more than 60 days and regularly keep deleting. |
|
It is felt that old/obsolete
job-advts are creating a bad impression |
Discontinue uploading Print
media/website job-advts (Sub-contracted to Sayida) |
|
we should not try to
artificially increase job-advt. database by uploading job-advts from print
media/web-sites |
Consultants to convert every
SON into a HOT JOB advt & handover to Saleem for uploading. When
assignment gets over, to ask Saleem to delete. |
|
fewer but current/genuine
job-advts directly posted would yield better response thru "relevant"
job alerts |
Stop "broadcasting"
of job-advts to Colleges/Cybercafes/Comp. Institutes. (—idea behind
JANS). |
|
If there are few job-advts our
own "HOT JOBS" have a better chance of being
searched/applied for. |
Nirmit to decide whether
"broadcasting" of job-advts to partner placement agencies
should be started and if yes, who should be responsible. |
|
Nirmit to decide, if at
a future date, we should ask agents.com to host our job-advt. forms
(after seeing the response to our Resume forms). |
Business Strategy
Re-orientation - Mass-Mailing
|
FOCUS |
IMPLICATIONS |
|
MASS-MAILING |
NO mass-mailing to be
undertaken thru snail-mail. |
|
All mass-mailing
(communication) to be thru emails only (See ADMIN TOOL feature
provided in V 3.0) |
|
|
As far as ALLIANCE-related
emailing is concerned, we may do so to promote our "Partner
website Program" (to Indian URLs - of which Vasudha is compiling a
database) Since "registration" is online and no offline/manual
work is involved. We may adopt same emailing strategy, as & when
Saleem succeeds in converting the rest of our "Alliance Programs"
(Colleges/Computer Insts/Cybercafes etc) to online registration,
eliminating all offline/manual work. |
|
|
We will still need to keep-up
(or even step-up) INSTITUTIONAL BRAND-BUILDING mass emailing amongst, |
|
|
- Jobseekers (active &
passive) |
|
|
- Corporates (Clients or
otherwise) |
|
|
- Advertisers to our website. |
|
|
- Journalists |
|
|
- other target-groups. |
Business Strategy
Re-orientation - Order Execution
|
FOCUS |
IMPLICATIONS |
|
ORDER EXECUTION |
With installation of OES,
we must make a "total break" from the past/manual/memory-dependent/multiple
methods. |
|
In the past our order execution
was |
All consultants MUST use
OES only |
|
- slow (in submitting proposal
& in subsequent execution) |
All INQUIRIES (whether
given over phone/fax/email/face-to-face meeting or Shopping Baskets) must be
directly Captured/entered into OES. |
|
-
haphazard/unsystematic/undocumented/discontinuous, due to manual methods
(unique to each consultant) & total dependence on memory |
This should be done, even for CASUAL
inquiries, to demonstrate to potential clients, - how SERIOUSLY we
treat them - how FAST we are able to respond. |
|
A fast response time is
the KEY-TO-SUCCESS in the internet age. |
|
|
Having pushed-out a PROPOSAL
thru OES (within ONE working day at the most), next thing is to
FOLLOW-UP relentlessly until client- accepts or rejects the proposal. |
|
|
Improvements (desired) to OES,
must be quickly communicated to Applitrack & vigorously
followed-up (Venkat in charge) |
|
|
By Dec 2001, give
clients facility to follow up/monitor his "orders" by
logging into OES (restricted to his orders only). |
Business Strategy
Re-orientation - Content Creation
|
FOCUS |
IMPLICATIONS |
|
CONTENT CREATION |
In the past, we have spent
considerable time/effort/money to create/upload following Searchable
databases on our website: |
|
Labour Laws/Statutory Returns |
|
|
Statistics of India |
|
|
Public Schools/Colleges |
|
|
Compu. Edu. Institutions etc. |
|
|
We will not spend anymore
time/effort/money to create additional Similar databases, offline
& manually. In future, such CONTENT CREATION will be limited
to: |
|
|
Automatic creation of
such databases online by visitors, on their own |
|
|
eg: Compu-Institute Profile
Form |
|
|
Created as a by-product
of an existing database |
|
|
eg: COM.COM
extracted/created from Resume database |
|
|
Simple uploading of
Standard/bought-out database into our existing online database |
|
|
eg: If we succeed in decrypting
DCA CD of 5.5 Lakh Companies & upload into our existing
"Company Vs. Product Vs. Industry" triangle. |
MBO - Agenda Day 1 (10th May
2002)
THREE P CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD
Venue: Athithi Hotel, Near
Orchid, Vile Parle (East), Mumbai
Conference at The Sangathan II
Hall, Annual Day Gathering at the Saptak Restaurant.
SCHEDULE FOR DAY 1 - 10th May
2002
|
S.N. |
POLICY ISSUES TO BE
DISCUSSED |
Presented By |
Time allocated |
Div. Of time → Topic
(Minutes) |
Div. Of time → Discussion
(Minutes) |
Div. Of time → Conslusion
(Minutes) |
|
9.00 to 10.00 am |
||||||
|
1 |
Vision Statement |
HCP |
9.00 to 10.00 am |
15 |
30 |
15 |
|
Tea Biscuits |
10.00 to 10.15 am |
|||||
|
2 |
Pricing |
NHP |
10.15 am to 11.15 am |
15 |
30 |
15 |
|
3 |
Expense budget |
Ashutosh / Abhinandan |
11.15 noon - 1.00 pm |
60 |
30 |
15 |
|
Lunch time |
1.00 pm to 1.30 pm |
|||||
|
4 |
Client Selection & List
of Assignments (reasons for non -conversions) |
Rajesh / Venu |
1.30 pm to 2.30 pm |
15 |
30 |
15 |
|
5 |
Business Opportunities |
Saikumar |
2.30 to 3.30 pm |
15 |
30 |
15 |
|
Tea Time |
3.30 pm to 3.45 pm |
|||||
|
6 |
Assignment Distribution |
Megha |
3.45 pm to 4.45 pm |
15 |
30 |
15 |
|
7 |
Fax Sharing |
Mitchelle |
4.45 pm to 5.45 pm |
15 |
30 |
15 |
|
8 |
Wind Up for Day 1 |
NHP |
5.45 pm to 6.15 pm |
MBO - Agenda Day 2 (11th May
2002)
THREE P CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD
SCHEDULE FOR DAY 2 - 11th May
2002
|
S.N. |
POLICY ISSUES TO BE
DISCUSSED |
Presented By |
Time allocated |
Div. Of time → Topic |
Div. Of time → Discussion |
Div. Of time → Conslusion |
|
1 |
Performance Incentive |
Monica / Usha |
9.00 am to 10.00 am |
15 |
30 |
15 |
|
Tea & Breakfast |
10.00 am to 10.15 am |
|||||
|
2 |
Brand Building |
Sanjeev |
10.15 am to 11.15 am |
15 |
30 |
15 |
|
3 |
Are we fighting fit ? |
NHP |
11.15pm to 11.45 pm |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
4 |
Business Process to be
automated |
Reena / Vinay / Rajeev |
11.45 am to 1.00 pm |
30 |
30 |
15 |
|
Lunch |
1.00 pm to 1.30 pm |
|||||
|
5 |
Features of Intranet |
Chauvin |
1.30 pm to 2.00 pm |
15 |
10 |
5 |
|
6 |
Data Security Measures |
Reena |
2.00 pm to 2.30 pm |
|||
|
7 |
Conclusion of the MBO |
Shalini |
2.30 pm. To 3.30 pm |
|||
|
Tea/Biscuits |
3.30 pm to 3.45 pm |
|||||
|
7 |
Evening - Annual Day
Gathering |
3P Team + Family |
6.30 pm. - 10.30 pm. |
Consultant Manashi 👩
This graph tracks Collections
for the year 2001-2002.
|
Metric |
Details |
|
Annual Original Target |
12 (by March '02) |
|
1st Q (Actual) |
|
|
Apr |
Approx 0.5 |
|
May |
Approx 1.2 |
|
Jun |
1.65 |
|
2nd Q (Revised Target) |
|
|
Jul |
2.0 |
|
Aug |
6.0 |
|
Sep |
9.0 |
|
Cumulative Actual at Jun |
1.65 |
|
Cumulative Revised Target at
Sep |
9.0 |
Consultant Pratibha 👩
This graph tracks Collections
for the year 2001-2002.
|
Metric |
Details |
|
Annual Original Target |
12 (by March '02) |
|
1st Q (Actual) |
|
|
Apr |
Approx 0.5 |
|
May |
Approx 1.0 |
|
Jun |
1.7 |
|
2nd Q (Revised Target) |
|
|
Jul |
Approx 2.7 |
|
Aug |
3.5 |
|
Sep |
5.0 |
|
Cumulative Actual at Jun |
1.7 |
|
Cumulative Revised Target at
Sep |
5.0 |
Consultant Bedekar 👨
This graph tracks Collections
for the year 2001-2002.
|
Metric |
Details |
|
Annual Original Target |
32 (by March '02) |
|
1st Q (Actual) |
|
|
Apr |
Approx 1.5 |
|
May |
4.5 |
|
Jun |
5.0 |
|
2nd Q (Revised Target) |
|
|
Jul |
Approx 6.0 |
|
Aug |
7.5 |
|
Sep |
10.5 |
|
Cumulative Actual at Jun |
5.0 |
|
Cumulative Revised Target at
Sep |
10.5 |






























































































































































































No comments:
Post a Comment