PROJECT DE-BUG-OES

(Project "De-Bug OES" Annex A)

PROJECT "DE-BUG OES" ANNEX A

• Complete "by-passing" of "Preliminary Interview" screens, if desired, for one or all candidates shortlisted.
• Adding new Candidate-names/records to "Shortlisted Candidate" screen at any time/date/stage & as many as desired.
• Complete Flexibility/freedom to arrange (or not arrange) interviews of any one or more no. of candidates with the client on different dates/times/venues of client's choice.
• Repating of "OUTSTANDINGS" must be for all types of Invoices (Minm Search Fee & Advance/Progress Payments/Final Payment & Out-of-Pocket Expenses).
• Proposal History
• Ability to enter special characters (Item #11 of Annex-D)
• E-Mail ID Problem (Item #12 of Annex-D)

New Annexure - C

Changes that ASL will do. Errors discou'd after 6th Feb. meeting.

Sr. No.	Addressed To	Details of Error / 3P's Comment
1	Neeraj/Yogesh	Inquiry through Shopping Basket when converted in to an inquiry, the inquiry form contains a field called "Educational Qualification" in the "Position Details" section, is a mandatory field & also disabled. Thus user can't fill-up any text (because the field is disabled) also can't proceed (because the field is mandatory) Kindly activate this field.
2	Neeraj/Yogesh	In Scheduler "C"- Sales Order numbers against which minimum fees are yet to be received. Also reflect those SON's against which the balance amount to be receive is zero, i.e. for those SON's minimum search fees has already been received should go out from this scheduler.
3	Neeraj/Yogesh	Transaction/Interview Schedule screen where one has to fill up the three mandatory fields viz: 'Date of Interview, Time of Interview, Interview Venue' for all the shortlisted candidate. Kindly make these fields optional. The importance/essentiality of making OPTIONAL, following fields: Date of Interview, Time of Interview, Interview Venue. The logic is simple. Even if we have shortlisted & recommended (say) 5 candidates to the client, there is no way, we can insist/force the client to, Interview all of them (at all!) OR Even give us an "Interview schedule" (date/time/venue) for all of them right at the outset, even if he agrees/accepts that he will, in due course, interview all of them There is no way, we can tell a customer, "Either you give me interview date/time/venue for All or for NONE!"
4	Neeraj/Yogesh	Error in the Scheduler display Date (Right hand top). System displays date as Wednesday, June 12, 2002 as on 13th May, 2002. Word file attached with the print of the error screen. Please check & revert.
5	Neeraj/Yogesh	Reports/Matrix - Both the reports under this menu are not working, & gives the error "Page cannot be displayed". The reports title are: - Historical Statement Matrix & Operational Control Statement Matrix.

Flagging/tagging of any particular all Shortlisted Candidates (ref: SON)

Annexure-D

Changes, which AppliTech to carry out, as per discussions on 6th Feb

Sr. No.	Details
1	Even after making an assignment closed in the project closure screen, still the report "Pending Order Consultant Wise Chronologically" reflects the order as pending.
ASI:	In progress
3P:	We will wait for your reply/patch
2	After entering the candidate details in listing once, after 3 months if we add more names to the list, we are unable to process that particular candidates details any further. Your e-mail dated Feb.9, 2002 Point no.2 - Adding candidates at a later date
ASI:	It's working fine here. We have already provided "Get More" button in Edit mode in Interview Schedule and Interview Reschedule Transactions. This button can be used to fetch the candidates added later on in Candidate listings.
3P:	Get More button is available in the edit mode of Interview Schedule/interview reschedule, but after adding new candidates in module-1 & subsequently in OES candidate listing/transaction, system allows the user to save the record in this screen. However in the EDIT mode of "Interview Schedule screen", once we click the button "Get More" the candidates (previously added & newly added) are reflected in the screen. Once the user schedules the interview for newly added candidate, & the moment tries to save it system gives the error mentioned below, "P01-2147467259 ORA-20001: Error In Inserting OE_TDINTWSCHD ORA-00001: unique constraint (3P.INTWSCHDTL_PK) violated ORA-06512: at "3P.P_OE_TDINTWSCHDINSERT", line 67 ORA-06512: at line 1" & The URL address for the above error page is: http://192.168.1.101/InterviewSaveDel.asp.

(Change Request Status)

Sr. No.	Details
3	Change request No.1, Item No. 47 (Menu Entry by Client) Query for the reports to check whether the data is present against a client or not was dropped, since the performance will become a big issue, however AppliTech agreed that once the Client Name, SON & position are filled in the opening screen the same parameters will be passed on to the relevant calling forms as the default value.
ASI:	Done.
3P:	Not working. As described above, The report reflects for all the clients, even if one selects a Client Name, SON & Position
4	Reports where there are summary and there are 3 reports, which gives the details of the same. The report numbers in question are 74, 75, and 76.
ASI:	The summary will be coming on the top with the details underneath. As regarding the summary report & the corresponding detail reports (3 summary & 3 detailed) AppliTech will merge these reports and the summary will be coming on the top while the details will be given underneath the same report. Done.
3P:	Working as per the above description.
5	Report No.81 (Outstanding-Client Wise) & 82 (Outstanding-Consultant Wise) reflect outstanding only for Out Of Pocket Expenses (OOP) & does not consider the other types. It should reflect on the basis of all the invoice type (Minimum search fee/Advance fee/Progress fee/Final invoice/OOP).
ASI:	Done.
3P:	As far as Outstanding - Client Wise is concerned system reflects those SONs also, for which the outstanding amount is zero. Ideally, the system should not reflect data against those SONs for which outstanding amount is nil/zero. However Outstanding- Branch wise, SON wise, Consultants wise, Invoice type wise shows "You Do Not Have The Rights To View This Page" so we are unable to give any comment on this reports. We will wait until you rectify the errors in these screens.
6	AppliTech to provide the historical reports regarding the proposal amendment against each individual SON wise.
ASI:	In Progress
3P:	We will wait for your reply/patch. Yogesh to send the image for the "Proposal History" button.

 (Affiliate-wise Order Report & Master Menu Screen issues)

Sr. No.	Details
7	Affiliate - wise order report. (Format given by AppliTech mo... & given back to AppliTech)
	Will be done by AppliTech but the rate to be considered for the calculation of the earning of ALLY, will be based on the "Commission Rate (%)" as mentioned in the 3rd line of Ally Master. No other rate is to be considered.
ASL:	In Progress
3P:	We will wait for your reply/patch
8	Run-time error (Debug error) is coming in all the reports.
	The Debug error has been solved and shown to the officers of 3P. There are 3 report (the 1st three under the header "others") in which the page to be displayed is not found) In case it is a problem with the application it will be analyzed and rectified by AppliTech. Patch has been sent.
ASL:	Working Perfectly
3P:
9	In the report menu screen change the title "Operators" to "Operational".
ASL:	Done
3P:	Done
10	Scheduler Menu Screen -: Proposal which are yet to be confirmed by the client does not display any data even if one selects the status as "Proposal Awaited" in the "Proposal" screen (Transaction Menu)
ASL:	Done.
3P:	Done
11	Master Menu Screen -:In "Rate Contract Master" the system doesn't allow the user to enter special characters like % & etc in the "Description Of Contract" field. Since it is a Rate Contra allow the user to enter these characters. Also "Description Of Contract" field have space/character limitation. Kindly increase the no. of characters in this field so that one can enter the details about the rate contract. AppliTech will explore the possibility to increase the field length but AppliTech requested to use the system for 1 month and then decide on the field length.
ASL:	Done.

(Scheduler Screen and Documentation)

Sr. No.	Details
15	3P
	In the Scheduler Screen All the heads (Scheduler A to D) display wrong data in the entire scheduler screen. Kindly send the logic applied in scheduler screen under different titles so that the user will be able to understand & avoid mistakes in entering the data & understanding the scheduler
ASL:	Problem not Clear
3P:	Please refer to the list of error on scheduler, which I had sent you on 11/03/2002.
16	Documentation: Final decision: AppliTech will only give User Manual, Operating Manual, & Source Code. AppliTech will also try to find the data dictionary which was sent earlier to 3P and forward the same if possible
ASL:	In progress
3P:	We will wait for your reply

(Postal Acknowledgement Receipts to AppliTech Solutions LTD)

These are three identical DEPARTMENT OF POSTS-INDIA (भारतीय डाक विभाग) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT receipts for Registered Letter/Parcel sent to AppliTech Solutions LTD, 503 Kritish Vimanpura, Ahmedabad - 380015.

• Receipt 1:
• क्रमांक/No: 8920
• Dated: 13/8/02
• Addressed to: Mr. Anil Patel
• Receipt 2:
• क्रमांक/No: 9920
• Dated: 13/8/02
• Addressed to: Mr. Anil B.
• Receipt 3:
• क्रमांक/No: 9918
• Dated: 13/8/02
• Addressed to: Mr. Shahid Sayyed

(Postal Acknowledgement Receipts to AppliTech Solutions LTD)

These are three identical DEPARTMENT OF POSTS-INDIA (भारतीय डाक विभाग) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT receipts for Registered Letter/Parcel sent to AppliTech Solution LTD, 701 Shikanagar Netaji Marg, Ahmedabad - 9.

• Receipt 1:
• क्रमांक/No: 2917
• Dated: 13/8/02
• Addressed to: Mr. Shahid Sayyed
• Receipt 2:
• क्रमांक/No: 2918
• Dated: 13/8/02
• Addressed to: Mr. Anil Patel
• Receipt 3:
• क्रमांक/No: 2917
• Dated: 13/8/02 (The date and some other details are difficult to read, but the format is the same)
• Addressed to: Mr. Anil B.

(Registered AD Receipts)

These appear to be six postal receipts, likely Registered AD (Acknowledgement Due), with fixed stamp amounts of Rs. 25/- or Rs. 35/-. The addresses are for Ahmedabad and recipients are various individuals:

• Receipt 1 (No. 2917): Amount: Rs. 25/-. Addressed to: Mr. Shahid Sayyed, General Manager, Ahmedabad.
• Receipt 2 (No. 2918): Amount: Rs. 25/-. Addressed to: Mr. Shahid Sayyed, General Manager, Ahmedabad.
• Receipt 3 (No. 2919): Amount: Rs. 25/-. Addressed to: Mr. Amzad Divan, Deputy General Manager, Ahmedabad.
• Receipt 4 (No. 2920): Amount: Rs. 25/-. Addressed to: Mr. Arvind B, Manager (HR), Ahmedabad.
• Receipt 5 (No. 2921): Amount: Rs. 35/-. Addressed to: Mr. Anil C, Legal & Secretary, Ahmedabad.
• Receipt 6 (No. 2922): Amount: Rs. 35/-. Addressed to: Mr. Anil B. (or similar, text is partially obscured).

(Letter from 3P to AppliTech)

Aug. 13, 2002

To,

Mr. Anil B

Legal & Secretarial Division

Applitech Solution Limited

701, 'Shikhar' Netaji Marg, Navrangpura,

Ahmedabad – 380 009

Dear Sir,

I am in receipt (thru fax) of your "Final Notice Before Action" letter dated Aug. 9, 2002.

If you were aware of the entire background of this matter, I am sure, you would not have sent the above-mentioned letter. In fact, I have a feeling that you would have persuaded your technical / marketing team to first complete the debugging of the Order Execution Software developed by you.

To make you fully aware of the background, I enclose for your careful study, copies of our following letters/ notices, sent to your executives:

• Letter dated $21^{st}$ Dec, 2001
• Letter dated $4^{th}$ April, 2002
• Letter dated $6^{th}$ June, 2002
• Letter dated $17^{th}$ June, 2002

Thru the above-mentioned letters, we have already asked you

• $\to$ To immediately refund to us the amount of Rs. 5 Lakhs paid to you so far
• $\to$ To immediately compensate us with a sum of Rs. 100 Lakhs (Rupees One Hundred Lakhs) for the business losses suffered by us till Dec 21, 2001.

(Letter from H. C. Parekh)

By this letter, I wish to advise you that, as a result of your continued failure to deliver/ install/ commission, a perfectly working/ fault-free/ bug-free software, we have incurred further business-loss of yet another sum of Rs. 50 Lakhs between Dec $21^{st}$, 2001 and $31^{st}$ July, 2002, thus, taking the total business-losses suffered by us to Rs. 150 Lakhs (One Hundred and Fifty Lakhs).

We demand that, within ONE WEEK of receipt of this letter, you pay us this sum of Rs. 150 Lakhs, along with the refund of Rs. 5 Lakhs already paid to you.

We also reserve the right to claim from you the costs expected to be incurred by us in carrying out the required changes/ modifications to the OES Software, as indicated in our letter to Mr. Ankil Patel, dated June 17, 2002.

With regards

H. C. Parekh

cc: Mr. Shahid Saiyed

Applitech Solution Limited

cc: Mr. Ankil Patel

Managing Director

Applitech Solution Limited

 

(Final Notice Before Legal Action from AppliTech)

APPLITECH SOLUTION

Friday, August 9, 2002

FINAL NOTICE BEFORE LEGAL ACTION

Through: - RPAD/FAX.

3P Consultants Pvt Ltd.

B-1, Lok Bharti Complex

Marol Maroshi Road,

Andheri (E),

Mumbai 400 059

Dear Sirs,

SUB: - OUTSTANDING PAYMENTS OF RS 4.95 LACS.

Apropos above, we refer to our purchase order executed by 3P Consultants Pvt Ltd (3P) dated August, 24,2000, revised purchase order dated September 14, 2000 & purchase order amendment dated Oct, 5, 2001 with Applitech Solution Ltd ("the company") for the design development installation and commission of "order execution system software". Pursuant to the purchase order Applitech has executed the said software. However 3P has not paid the entire consideration amount for the said software 3P is currently liable to make payment of Rs 4.95 Lacs (Dues) to the company. Till this date 3P has neglected & failed to pay to the company the dues inspite of repeated reminders from the company.

There is still time, however, to avoid suit if you contact us within the next seven (7) days for release of our payment or submit us an acceptable proposal for payment of the outstanding amount.

This will be your final opportunity to resolve matters without the expense of court proceedings, failing to resolve, our advocates on our behalf will initiate legal action at your cost and consequences.

Very truly,

For. Applitech Solution Ltd

(Signature)

Anil. B

Legal & Secretarial Division.

 

(Newspaper Clipping: Saraswat Bank MD eased out)

Saraswat Bank MD eased out

Our Banking Bureau

MUMBAI, 12 AUGUST

The board of the Mumbai-headquartered Saraswat Co-operative Bank Ltd discontinued the services of managing director D R Shirodkar on Saturday and appointed S K Banerjee, general manager (legal), as acting managing director.¹²³⁴

Shirodkar said the board expressed no confidence in his system of working. He joined Saraswat Bank in 1970 as a sub-accou⁵ntant and rose to the position of managing director in 1998. Banerjee was also not available for comments. Insiders said that Shirod⁶kar was sacked as he refused to yield to extraneous influences. He was a victim of a political game, they added.⁷⁸

Saraswat Bank was in the new⁹s recently as it sent a legal notice to i-flex Solutions claiming damages of Rs 250 cr¹⁰ore on account of opportunity loss, loss of business and other costs on account of problems in implementing on time 'Flex Cube', a complete core banking solution package which would enable the bank to operate through a¹¹ centralised network and automa¹²te ing its retail, treasury and whole-sale banking operations with the total contract value working out to a sum of Rs 3.5 crore.¹³

However, instead of suing for damages immediately, the bank has chosen to appoint an arbitrator and then file a writ¹⁴ petition seeking certain injunctions.

 

(Saraswat Bank Notice Re: i-flex solutions Ltd.)

Saraswat Bank

NOTICE

Re- i-flex solutions Ltd.

24-06-02

ISSUED IN THE INTEREST OF THE SHAREHOLDERS, CUSTOMERS OF THE BANK AND THE MEMBERS OF PUBLIC

With reference to the newspaper advertisement of Prospectus (advertisement) of I-flex solutions ltd. (I-flex) concerning their public issue through book building method, published in the Business Standard dated June 21, 2002, Saraswat Bank states as follows: -

The Bank reiterates and stands by the Public Notice issued by the Bank as well as the various statements made by the Bank in the newspaper articles which appeared in several publications.

1. The advertisement of I-flex contains various false and misleading statements concerning licence agreement with the Bank and the Bank's claims.
2. The statement made by I-flex that they had delivered 19 modules (except 3) is misleading and incorrect. The Bank states that I-flex has not delivered or implemented the software packages as per the agreement. The 16 modules delivered are incomplete and do not meet the requirements as per the agreement.
3. The statement made by I-flex that the Bank has signed UAT is misleading and incorrect. The Bank has signed UAT conditionally subject to I-flex delivering many mission critical and statute compliant requirements in their software. This was acknowledged by I-flex and the said requirements were not delivered.
4. Payments against all invoices raised by I-flex to date have not been made as stated. This was also informed to their auditors. The reasons stated by I-flex for non-payment are incorrect. Payments in respect of certain milestones have not been made, as all functional aspects of the software modules have not been complied with fully by I-flex.
5. As a result the Bank has sent a Legal Notice to I-flex terminating the agreement and claiming losses. However, I-flex have not stated the contents of the Notice in entirety in the advertisement. In addition to claims for non performance, the Notice also contained the following claims: -

a) I-flex to desist from marketing the versions of FLEXCUBE software which incorporate the business knowledge and ideas and proprietary information of the Bank.

b) I-flex violated the terms of agreement by employing the Bank personnel.

This Notice has been issued in the interest of the Public at large.

For The Saraswat Co-operative Bank Ltd.

(Signature)

D.R. SHIRODKAR

MANAGING DIRECTOR

Place: Mumbai

Date: 22-06-2002.

 

(List of Events - Part 1)

LIST OF EVENTS REGARDING ORDER EXECUTION SYSTEM

Sl. No.	Series Of Events/Activities	Date of Event/Activities	From	To	Final Remarks
1	Purchased Order - ASL	August $21^{st}$, 2000	K. Sudhakar	H.C. Parekh	Exhibit A - Purchase Order
2	Revised Purchased Order - by 3P	August $24^{th}$, 2000	H.C. Parekh	K. Sudhakar	Exhibit B - Revised Purchase Order
3	Revised Purchased Order - ASL	September $12^{th}$, 2000	K. Sudhakar	H.C. Parekh	Exhibit C - Revised Purchase Order
4	Revised Purchased Order - 3P	September $14^{th}$, 2000	H.C. Parekh	K. Sudhakar	Exhibit D - Revised Purchase Order
5	Payment through number 5412944 of Rs. 1,65,000	September $14^{th}$, 2001	H.C. Parekh	K. Sudhakar	Exhibit D - Revised Purchase Order
6	Project Start Date - $25^{th}$ September, 2000	As per Annex - B Revised Purchase Order $14^{th}$ Sep, 2000	H.C. Parekh	K. Sudhakar	Exhibit E - Revised Purchase Order
7	Project Closer Date $26^{th}$ January, 2001	As per Annex - B Revised Purchase Order $14^{th}$ Sep, 2000	H.C. Parekh	K. Sudhakar	Exhibit E - Revised Purchase Order
8	Provisional Sign Off	$9^{th}$ June, 2001	Nirmit Parekh	Neeraj Rathi	Exhibit G - Provisional Sign Off
9	Legal Notice - I	$21^{st}$ December, 2001	H.C. Parekh	Shahid Saiyed & Ankil Patel	Exhibit G - No written reply from ASL
10	Legal Notice - II	$4^{th}$ April, 2002	H.C. Parekh	Shahid Saiyed	Exhibit H - No written reply from ASL

 

LIST OF EVENTS REGARDING ORDER EXECUTION SYSTEM

Sl. No.	Series Of Events/Activities	Date of Event/Activities	From	To	Final Remarks
11	Legal Notice - III	$6^{th}$ June, 2002	H.C. Parekh	Neeraj Rathi Ankil Patel & Shahid Saiyed	Exhibit I - No written reply from ASL
12	Legal Notice - IV	$17^{th}$ June, 2002	H.C. Parekh	Ankil Patel & Shahid Saiyed & Neeraj Rathi	Exhibit J - No written reply from ASL
13	Delivery of payments		HCP		Exhibit K
14	History of some important email communication with ASL		Sanjeev Tiwari	Neeraj Rathi	Exhibit L