A
PROPOSAL FOR DOUBLING ADVERTISING REVENUE
- BACKGROUND
- POSSIBILITY
- MARKETING
METHOD
- HOW
DOES ADVERTISER BENEFIT?
- HOW
DOES TOI BENEFIT?
- SAMPLE
STATEMENT.
3P
Consultants B-1, Lok Bharati Complex, Marol Maroshi
Road, Andheri (East) Bombay 400 059. Ph: (+91-22) 850 5800 / 850 2269 / 850
2270 Fax : (+91-22) 850 6663
3
P CONSULTANTS (with graphic showing PEOPLE, PRODUCTIVITY,
PROFITABILITY)
BACKGROUND
- TIMES
OF INDIA earns major revenue from "Appointment
(Recruitment) Advertisements."
- TOI
would like to further increase this revenue without increasing "Tariff".
This could happen if more client companies could be attracted to advertise
thro' TIMES OF INDIA. This, however is very difficult, considering
that TOI's tariff is already 25% - 50% more than major newspapers.
POSSIBILITY
- One
way TIMES OF INDIA could attract more clients to advertise is by
offering them a "Value Added Service, without any additional
cost to the client."
- 3P
Consultants could help TOI offer to its clients
such a "Value Added service."
MARKETING
METHOD
Under
this scheme,
- Advt
will carry the (advertising) client's name, but not his address.
- The
Advertiser will direct the applicants (respondents) to send their
applications (biodatas) to TIMES OF INDIA (Post Box No. )
- TOI
will, on a daily basis, arrange to deliver the response to 3P
Consultants.
- 3P
Consultants will enter the highlights of each
applicant into computer.
- At
the end of the pre-determined period (say 15 days from the date of the
advertisement), 3P Consultant will handover to TIMES OF INDIA,
a floppy containing the highlights of all the applicants (along with a
box-file containing all original applications, arranged serially and
numbered).
- Using
this floppy, TOI could print-out a one-line "Biodata Highlight
Statement" (as per sample enclosed) and forward it to the
Advertiser along with the box-file containing the original applications.
- If
desired, TIMES OF INDIA could also send the floppy itself to the
advertiser.
HOW
DOES ADVERTISER BENEFITS ?
- Advertiser
saves the clerical man-hours of
- opening
the envelopes
- sorting
according to each position advertised and filing serially in different
box-files (as per positions advertised).
- By
looking at the computer print-out, the Advertiser gets a "Bird's
Eye View" of all the applicant-profiles (in descending order of
age/ experience).
- Such
a systematic, neat and logical arrangement of the profiles would enable
the Advertiser to quickly eliminate (without going through each
& every application) those candidates who do NOT meet the
"Advertised criteria". Usually 75% of the
applications fall in this category.
- This
would mean that the advertiser will need to look at only 25% of the
applications to decide "whom" to call for interview.
- The
statement could carry additional blank columns in which the Advertise
could make entries such as
- Whether
called for interview / date of interview.
- Whether
appeared for interview and what was the outcome.
(Continued
Advertiser Benefits & HOW DOES TIMES OF INDIA Benefit?)
- Whether
an appointment - letter issued.
- Tentative
date of joining
- Salary
offered. etc. etc.
- We
could also provide a "software" feature in the floppy,
whereby the advertiser could "search" for a specific
candidate or a specific information, at any future date, in matter of
"seconds"! This means an Advertiser has created for himself,
at no extra-cost, a comprehensive "Data-Bank" of
all applicants against all advertisements.
How
does TIMES OF INDIA Benefit?
By
offering such unprecedented & unique value-added service to the advertiser,
"at no extra-cost", TIMES OF INDIA could expect its
Appointment-related Advt. Revenue to DOUBLE within a span of 6 months.
(Cover
Letter - Dated September 23, 1996)
MR.
BHASKER DAS Vice President THE TIMES OF INDIA
Dr. D.N. Road, BOMBAY - 400 001
September
23, 1996
Dear
Mr. Das,
Value
Added Service
We
discussed this during my visit to your office on August 28th.
During
our telecom last week, you mentioned that you would like to have further
discussions on our proposal at a mutually convenient time. Please let me know
when.
In
the meantime, in the enclosed pages, I have tried to provide answers to the
apprehension raised by you during our last meeting.
With
kind regards,
H.C.
PAREKH Principal Consultant
(Contact
info repeated at the bottom)
(POINTS
FOR DISCUSSION)
3P
CONSULTANTS (with graphic showing PEOPLE, PRODUCTIVITY,
PROFITABILITY)
TIMES
OF INDIA PROJECT POINTS FOR DISCUSSION
- Design
of Computer Print-out
- Should
we also supply floppy? If yes, what kind of "search software"
should it contain? What will it enable the advertiser to do?
Search
by
- Education
Qualification
- Age
(years)
- Exp.
(years)
- Name
of Current-employer
- Current
location
- Should
"search-software" permit /enable the advertiser to
print-out "files" created by each "query"?
- Should
"search-software" enable the advertiser to "add
up" data contained in, say 10/20 / any no. of floppies?
- In
such an event, would software also enable the advertiser to know when he
shoots a query to the consolidated/clubbed database, as to "which"
candidate had applied against "Advt. ?"
- Should
"search-software" even enable an advertiser to carry-out
search the same way 3P is doing? i.e.
- By
Industry
- By
Function
- By
Salary
- By
Location
- By
Age
- By
Exp.
- By
Key-words
(Contact
info repeated at the bottom)
(Implications
and 3P ADVANTAGE)
3P
CONSULTANTS (with graphic showing PEOPLE, PRODUCTIVITY,
PROFITABILITY)
This
amounts to literally giving away our new QUERY-MODULE (but not the
source-code), to each advertiser "free-of-cost"! - and again
and again with each advertisement handled!
What
would this imply?
It
would, of course, enable each advertiser to build-up his own computerised
Databank - against all the advertisements released by him - in a manner
identical to the way we are building our Data bank today.
It
will also enable each advertiser to carry-out "Search" (of
course, of his own database) in a manner identical to ours, by being able to
use identical Search-software.
This
will be a tremendous advantage that the advertiser stands to gain over a
period of time - WITHOUT having to spend anything extra!
For
TOI/3P Consortium, this would be a VERY POWERFUL USP (Unique Selling
Point) for "Looking-up" a large no. of advertisers to the
"VAS" (Value-Added Service).
Obviously
this USP will work very well with companies who are large - advertise
frequently
WHAT
IS 3P ADVANTAGE ?
By
hooking-up a large no. of big/frequent advertisers, 3P's own database would
swell very fast. Our data-base could, conceivably become 100 or 1000
times bigger than the database of even the biggest and the most frequent
advertiser such as L&T.
This
would mean that, over a period of 2/3 years, even companies (such as L&T)
who, under our scheme, have managed to build-up their own substantial database,
would come to us for their requirement when they know that our database is 1000
times bigger than theirs!
(Contact
info repeated at the bottom)
(Database
Freshness and Maintenance)
3P
CONSULTANTS (with graphic showing PEOPLE, PRODUCTIVITY,
PROFITABILITY)
...requirement
when they know that our database is 1000 times bigger than theirs!
Of
course, this advantage would occur - and continue to occur - if, and only if,
we succeed/manage to keep this database FRESH/UP-TO-DATE!
Even
if we have a million executives on our database, no one would bother to come to
us, if the data is 5 years old in most of the cases!
So,
- building-up
a huge database
- and
- keeping
it up-to-date,
has
to go hand-in-hand.
If
we cannot keep it fresh, we may as well not bother to build it up in the
first place!
In
such a case, we have given-away an advantage
- to
Times of India
- to
the Advertiser.
Without
getting any benefit in return!!
Hence
the entire proposal to TOI - and thru TOI to advertiser - hinges on our ability
to evolve and implement, a system/mechanism to keep the bio-datas fresh, all
the time.
In
our system, we have provided for sending-out to each executive on his
birth-day (that means once a year) a greeting letter urging him to update
his bio-data, by sending an EDS (or a truncated / modified EDS).
But
these are executives, who know they have sent us their biodata
- either
against an Advt
- or
on their own.
So
they will not be Surprised to receive a letter from us.
(Contact
info repeated at the bottom)
(EDS
Follow-up)
3P
CONSULTANTS (with graphic showing PEOPLE, PRODUCTIVITY,
PROFITABILITY)
But
how do we approach those who have responded to an Advt. say, for VOLTAS?
We cannot - and must not - reveal to them how we got hold of their bio-data.
ANSWER
Within
one month of creating "data-base" of a respondent (to any
TOI-VAS advt.), we should send-out a printed Circular mailer-letter to
him Suggesting that he register with us. Obviously we will keep Silent on how
we got his name/address.
If
he/she returns the EDS duly filled-in, we have no problem there after, since we
will be alloting a PEN number.
What
happens if he/she does not return the EDS ? Then how can we send a reminder
next year on birth-day ? He may wonder how we got hold of his birth-date!
But
then there are dozens of forms that a person has to fill-in where he is
required to mention his birth date -
e.g.
- Insurance
Policy
- Membership
(Dinners Clubs/Citi Bank)
- ~~Sterling
Resort/Clubs.~~
- Ration
Card
- Passport
- Bank
Accounts etc. etc.
(Contact
info repeated at the bottom)
(Data
Management & 3P's Disadvantage)
3P
CONSULTANTS (with graphic showing PEOPLE, PRODUCTIVITY,
PROFITABILITY)
We
could also decide to send an EDS only if a person, in the first place, sends
his biodata, against a mailer.
And
of course a mailer can be sent once every year, without talking of his
birth-date!
And
those who have once sent us a bio-data and/or EDS, it would be a birth day
greeting.
So
I do not see any unsurmountable problem, as far as hiding our "source"
of information is concerned.
But
what we will really need to be concerned about is
- managing
data-entry (data-base creation) of say 1000 application every week
- sending-out
"Mailers" to these 1000 persons every week.
We
may have to get this done
- on
our premises
- using
our facilities
but
employeeing operators on "per piece" basis.
WHAT
COULD BE 3P'S DISADVANTAGE ?
(if
we give away on a floppy our comprehensive QUERY SOFTWARE to each
advertiser ?)
- This
(software) is not of much use to an infrequent advertiser.
- It
is of considerable benefit to a large company which also advertises
frequently. In fact this (benefit) is our USP.
- The
danger/disadvantage arises if
(Contact
info repeated at the bottom)
(Threats
and Protection Measures)
3P
CONSULTANTS (with graphic showing PEOPLE, PRODUCTIVITY,
PROFITABILITY)
- one
of the advertiser plans to get into recruitment business himself
- the
software is passed on to one (or more) of the existing recruitment
companies.
- Times
of India themselves plan to get into Recruitment-business. They could make
copies of all floppies meant for the advertisers and build-up a database
themselves + they have search-software!
Can
we protect ourselves against these dangers (of, ourselves creating dozens of
competitors)?
Can
we do, one (or more) of the following ?
- Floppy
cannot be copied, either on another floppy or on a
hard-disk.
- "Data"
as well as "Query-Software" gets automatically wiped-out,
one year from the date of advertisement (with such a warning incorporated
in floppy as well as TOI's special offer-letter for the VAS (Value added
services).
- Print-outs
cannot be taken from the floppy.
- Each
advertiser (and also each advertisement data) being given a secret
password/codeword, so that no one else can access (see it on screen) it
even if he manages to steal the floppy.
Of
course TOI will know every such password, since 3P is completely in the
background. Entire success of this scheme depends upon the advertiser knowing
NOTHING about the role of 3P! Even Slightest hint of 3P's involvement will
drive away all the advertisers.
THREAT
OF LEAKAGE TO COMPETITORS.
I
presume that our "Query-Software", by itself, is not of much
(Contact
info repeated at the bottom)
(Protecting
Against Internal Threats and Sub-Contracting)
3P
CONSULTANTS (with graphic showing PEOPLE, PRODUCTIVITY,
PROFITABILITY)
...use
to any competitor. Not only he must have a large database on which he can use
the Query-Software, but I suppose, his data-base has tobe "Structured"
according to our Data Capture Module. It is highly unlikely that his
database is "organised" in absolutely identical manner as our
database. If this be true, his stealing or acquiring only our "Querry-Software"
may be of no help/advantage to him!
If
the foregoing is true, than our only REAL threat is from TOI themselves
getting into recruitment business because, they would have both
- "Candidate-data"
which is structured as per our Data-Capture module
- "Querry-Software"
And
even if TOI management may have no desire to get into
"recruitment" by way of diversification, there is every
possibility that one or more of its employees may quit carrying with them, both
the data and the Querry-Software!
QUESTION
:
How
do we protect ourselves against such an eventuality ?
If
TOI is to Sub-contract this "Value-addition" job
to 3P Consultants, could it make at least some of the advertisers to
"Shy-away" from making use of this Services ? Would they
look-upon TOI/3P Consortium as building-up a "Executive Database"
at their expense ? - even if this is not to be used for Recruitment, but, for
example, to be used as a Database for DIRECT MAILING LIST for any
marketing organisation ?
There
is a genuine possibility of being "perceived" so. This has to
be avoided by
- entering
into "Sub-contract" agreement with a Separate company
floated by 3P Consultant, having innocuous nomenclature.
(Contact
info repeated at the bottom)
(Advertisement
Response Analysis Table)
'A
TYPICAL ADVERTISEMENT RESPONSE ANALYSIS'
|
Client |
Media |
Size
of Advt. CC (a) |
Rate
Rs./cc (b) |
Cost
of Advt. (Rs.) (a x b) |
No.
of Applications Received Total |
No.
of application per each Rs. 1 Lakh |
|
Adani |
West
TOI |
$10\text{x}208
= 2080$ |
$1780$ |
$3,70,240$ |
\multirow{3}{*}{$1148$} |
\multirow{3}{*}{$124$} |
|
North
Hindustan Times |
$10\text{x}208
= 2080$ |
$1400$ |
$2,91,200$ |
|||
|
South
Hindu |
$10\text{x}208
= 2080$ |
$1275$ |
$2,65,200$ |
|||
|
$9,26,640$ |
||||||
|
L
& T |
TOI
(Bombay & Pune) |
$10\text{x}232
= 2320$ |
$1510$ |
$3,50,320$ |
\multirow{2}{*}{$862$} |
\multirow{2}{*}{$133$} |
|
Hindu |
$10\text{x}232
= 2320$ |
$1275$ |
$2,95,800$ |
|||
|
$6,46,120$ |
(Cumulative
Income vs. Cumulative Expense Graph)
CUMU.
INCOME Vs. CUMU. EXPENSE DURING 15 MONTH AGREEMENT PERIOD IF MONTHLY VOLUMES
PROCESSED ARE AS SHOWN ON PAGE 10 OF AGREEMENT. CALCULATIONS SHOWN ON NEXT PAGE
GRAPH
(A)
ASSUMPTIONS
- Volumes
each month as per page 10
- "Rates"
as per alt $\text{#1}$.
(Graph
shows Cumulative Total Income and Cumulative Total (Fixed + Variable) Expenses
over 15 months and Monthly Volume Processed. $Y$-axis is Rs. (Lakhs).)
- Total
Income (Solid Line): Reaches approx. 33.75 Lakhs
at 35K volume.
- Total
(Fixed + Var.) Expenses (Dashed Line): Reaches approx.
19.50 Lakhs at 35K volume.
- Shift
lines are indicated for 1 shift, 2 shift,
and 3 shift.
BREAK-EVEN
ANALYSIS
|
Month
No. |
Month |
No.
of applications to be Processed |
Variable
Service Fee @ Rs. 15/appln |
Variable
Service Fee as per Slab/Rates (A) |
Credit
Note (Difference) |
Fixed
Charges per Month (B) |
Total
Income Rs.(000) (A) + (B) |
Expenses/month
Fixed |
Expenses/month
Variable |
Expenses/month
Total |
Net
Profit for the Month |
Cumulative
Net Profit |
No.
of Shift |
|
1 |
NOV |
- |
- |
- |
- |
$40,000$ |
$40$ |
$0$ |
$0$ |
$0$ |
$+40$ |
$+40$ |
Nil |
|
2 |
DEC |
- |
- |
- |
- |
$40$ |
$80$ |
$0$ |
$0$ |
$0$ |
$+40$ |
$+80$ |
|
|
3 |
J-97 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
$40$ |
$120$ |
$0$ |
$0$ |
$0$ |
$-45$ |
$-35$ |
|
|
4 |
F |
$3000$ |
$45,000$ |
$45,000$ |
- |
$85$ |
$120$ |
$50$ |
$35$ |
$85$ |
- |
$-35$ |
|
|
5 |
M |
$5000$ |
$75,000$ |
$75,000$ |
- |
$115$ |
$320$ |
$+30$ |
$-05$ |
ONE |
|||
|
6 |
A |
$7000$ |
$105,000$ |
$103,000$ |
$2,000$ |
$143$ |
$463$ |
$+58$ |
$+53$ |
||||
|
7 |
M |
$10,000$ |
$150,000$ |
$145,000$ |
$5,000$ |
$185$ |
$648$ |
$+100$ |
$+153$ |
||||
|
8 |
J |
$12,000$ |
$180,000$ |
$171,000$ |
$9,000$ |
$211$ |
$859$ |
$+126$ |
$+279$ |
||||
|
9 |
J |
$15,000$ |
$225,000$ |
$210,000$ |
$15,000$ |
$250$ |
$1109$ |
$+80$ |
$+359$ |
||||
|
10 |
A |
$20,000$ |
$300,000$ |
$270,000$ |
$30,000$ |
$310$ |
$1419$ |
$100$ |
$70$ |
$170$ |
$+140$ |
$+499$ |
TWO |
|
11 |
S |
$22,000$ |
$330,000$ |
$292,000$ |
$38,000$ |
$332$ |
$1751$ |
$+162$ |
$+661$ |
||||
|
12 |
O |
$25,000$ |
$375,000$ |
$325,000$ |
$50,000$ |
$365$ |
$2116$ |
$+195$ |
$+856$ |
||||
|
13 |
N |
$27,000$ |
$405,000$ |
$345,000$ |
$60,000$ |
$385$ |
$2501$ |
$+130$ |
$+986$ |
||||
|
14 |
Dec |
$30,000$ |
$450,000$ |
$375,000$ |
$75,000$ |
$415$ |
$2916$ |
$150$ |
$105$ |
$255$ |
$+160$ |
$+1146$ |
|
|
15 |
Jan-98 |
$35,000$ |
$525,000$ |
$420,000$ |
$105,000$ |
$460$ |
$3376$ |
$+205$ |
$+1351$ |
||||
|
TOTAL |
$211,000$ |
$3,165,000$ |
$2,775,000$ |
$3,89,000$ |
$600,000$ |
$3,375,000$ |
$19,55,000$ |
$13,51$ |
- ALT
#1 $\to$ Volume processed as per pg # 10
PER
SHIFT/PER MONTH
|
Fixed
Cost |
Variable
Cost |
|||
|
Item |
Item |
Amt. |
Item |
Amt. |
|
Manpower |
Peon
(1) |
$1200$ |
DE
op. (8) |
$20,000$ |
|
Clerk
(2) |
$4000$ |
|||
|
Supervisor
(1) |
$5000$ |
|||
|
Manager
(1) |
$10000$ |
|||
|
Security
(1) |
$3500$ |
|||
|
Sub
total |
$23,700$ |
$20,000$ |
||
|
Floppy |
$550$ |
|||
|
Ribbon |
$3000$ |
|||
|
Power |
Light
Power |
$1000$ |
||
|
A/c
Power |
$3000$ |
Computer
Power |
$2500$ |
|
|
A/c
Power |
$6000$ |
|||
|
Computer
Rental |
$10
\text{ m/c}$ |
$9000$ |
||
|
Maint.
Contract |
$11
\text{ m/c}$ |
$5000$ |
||
|
Snacks
(Tea) |
$2500$ |
$3000$ |
||
|
Software
Maint. |
$5000$ |
- |
||
|
$49,200$ |
$35,050$ |
Note:
The total fixed cost appears to be calculated as $23,700 + 1000 + 3000 + 9000 +
5000 + 2500 + 5000 = 49,200$. The total variable cost appears to be $20,000 +
550 + 3000 + 2500 + 6000 + 3000 = 35,050$.
(Total
Fees Graph - ALT #1)
(Graph
shows the Total (Fixed + Variable) Fees (ALT #1) against Monthly Volume
Processed.)
- Y-axis:
Rs (000) - Monthly Variable Service Fee
- X-axis:
Monthly Volume Processed $\to$
- Point
(0, 40K): Monthly Fixed Committment Charge
- The
line representing TOTAL (FIXED + VARIABLE) FEES (ALT #1) shows a
linear increase starting at 40K (for 0 volume) and reaching 500K
at 40K volume.
- Key
points plotted: (5K, 115K), (10K, 185K), (15K, 250K), (20K, 310K), (25K,
365K), (30K, 415K), (35K, 460K), (40K, 500K).
(Total
Earnings Vs. Total Cost Graph)
TOTAL
EARNINGS Vs. TOTAL COST AT DIFFERENT MONTHLY VOLUMES PROCESSED
- Y-axis:
Rs. (1000)
- X-axis:
MONTHLY VOLUME PROCESSED (5K to 40K)
- TOTAL
EARNINGS (ALT # A) (Red Line): Starts at 40K (0
Volume) and reaches 500K at 40K Volume.
- Points
plotted: 40K, 115K, 185K, 250K, 310K, 365K, 415K, 460K, 500K.
- Total
Cost (Steps):
- Fixed
Cost / 1 shift: 40K (from 0 to approx. 10K volume)
- Total
Cost 1 shift: Starts at 40K, increases in steps,
e.g., to 85K at 5K volume, 130K at 10K volume.
- Fixed
Cost / 2 shift: 100K (from approx. 10K to 20K volume)
- Total
Cost 2 shift: Starts at 100K, increases in steps,
e.g., to 170K at 15K volume, 235K at 20K volume.
- FIXED
COST / 3 shift: 150K (from approx. 20K volume)
- TOTAL
EARNING (ALT # B) (Green Line, Curved): Shows an
alternative, lower earning line.
- Points
plotted: 205K, 260K, 285K, 310K.
- Loss
Areas are indicated (shaded areas where total cost
exceeds total earnings).
(Alternative
A Slab Rate)
ALT
# A
|
Slab |
Rate |
Variable |
Fixed |
Total |
|
0-5000 |
15 |
75,000 |
$+40,000$ |
$=
115,000$ |
|
5001-10000 |
14 |
145,000 |
$+40$ |
$=
185$ |
|
10001-15000 |
13 |
210,000 |
$+40$ |
$=
250$ |
|
15001-20000 |
12 |
270,000 |
$+40$ |
$=
310$ |
|
20001-25000 |
11 |
325,000 |
$+40$ |
$=
365$ |
|
25001-30000 |
10 |
375,000 |
$+40,000$ |
$=
415,000$ |
|
30001-35000 |
9 |
420,000 |
$+40$ |
$=
460$ |
|
$\ge
35000-40000$ |
8 |
460,000 |
$+40$ |
$=
500$ |
|
Spread
$\to 7$ |
- $*Variable$
column shows the cumulative variable fee up to the top of the slab.*
This
is the "BEST" alternative and we should try to get TOI to
agree to this.
(Rate
Alternative B)
ALT
# B
|
Slab
(Applications in Thousands) |
Rate
(Rs.) |
Variable
(Rs. '000) |
Fixed
(Rs. '000) |
Total
(Rs. '000) |
|
0-5 |
15 |
75,000 |
$+40,000$ |
$=
115,000$ |
|
5-10 |
13 |
140,000 |
$+40$ |
$=
180$ |
|
10-15 |
11 |
195,000 |
$+40$ |
$=
235$ |
|
15-20 |
9 |
240,000 |
$+40$ |
$=
280$ |
|
20-25 |
7 |
275,000 |
$+40$ |
$=
315$ |
|
25-30 |
5 |
300,000 |
$+40$ |
$=
340$ |
|
30-35 |
3 |
315,000 |
$+40$ |
$=
355$ |
|
35-40 |
1 |
320,000 |
$+40$ |
$=
360$ |
Spread
$\to$ 14 !!
These
rates would appear ridiculous!
We
should not go below Rs. 5
(Rate
Alternative C)
ALT
# C
|
Slab
(Applications in Thousands) |
Rate
(Rs.) |
Variable
(Rs. '000) |
Fixed
(Rs. '000) |
Total
(Rs. '000) |
|
0-5 |
15 |
75,000 |
$+40,000$ |
$=
115,000$ |
|
5-10 |
10 |
125,000 |
$+40$ |
$=
165,000$ |
|
10-15 |
10 |
175,000 |
$+40$ |
$=
215,000$ |
|
15-20 |
7 |
210,000 |
$+40$ |
$=
250,000$ |
|
20-25 |
7 |
245,000 |
$+40$ |
$=
285,000$ |
|
25-30 |
6 |
275,000 |
$+40$ |
$=
315,000$ |
|
30-35 |
6 |
305,000 |
$+40$ |
$=
345,000$ |
|
35-40 |
5 |
330,000 |
$+40$ |
$=
370,000$ |
Spread
$\to$ 10
Even
this can be made Rs 6 [Note: 'Rs 6' is crossed out]
Although,
total earnings-wise, this alternative is quite close to Alt #2 [Note:
Likely a reference to Alt A, or a missing Alt 2], this alternative seems more
"balanced" (Sober!) and will require less calculations since
"slabs" are bigger.
(Rate
Alternative D - Final/Rock-Bottom)
ALT
# D
|
Slab
(Applications in Thousands) |
Rate
(Rs.) |
Variable
(Rs. '000) |
Fixed
(Rs. '000) |
Total
(Rs. '000) |
|
0-5 |
10 |
50,000 |
$+40,000$ |
$=
90,000$ |
|
5-10 |
9 |
95,000 |
$+40$ |
$=
135,000$ |
|
10-15 |
8 |
130,000 |
$+40$ |
$=
170,000$ |
|
15-20 |
7 |
165,000 |
$+40$ |
$=
205,000$ |
|
20-25 |
6 |
195,000 |
$+40$ |
$=
235,000$ |
|
25-30 |
5 |
220,000 |
$+40$ |
$=
260,000$ |
|
30-35 |
5 |
245,000 |
$+40$ |
$=
285,000$ |
|
35-40 |
5 |
270,000 |
$+40$ |
$=
310,000$ |
Spread
$\to$ 5
If
TOI feel very strongly that our rates in the beginning (lowest slabs)
are too high in other Alternatives, then we could adopt this alternative as a
kind of "final / rock-bottom position".
At
the lowest monthly volume of 5000 applications, we will just recover our
total cost (which is $\approx$ Rs. 85,000/- for 1 shift). We should not
budge from our demand for FIXED MONTHLY COMMITTMENT Charges @ Rs. 40,000/-.
(Output
Estimate & Assumptions)
OUTPUT
ESTIMATE ASSUMPTIONS HANDPOWER COST-ESTIMATE
|
Volume/month
→ |
12,500
applications |
25,000
applications |
|
Assumptions
$\downarrow$ |
||
|
No.
of Shift |
$\text{1st}$ |
$\text{1st}
+ \text{2nd}$ |
|
Shift
Timing |
$4:30
\text{ pm} \to 12 \text{ midnight}$ |
$12
\text{ midnight} \to 7:30 \text{ am}$ |
|
Total
Hours/shift |
$7
\frac{1}{2}$ |
$7
\frac{1}{2}$ |
|
Lunch
Break |
$\frac{1}{2}$ |
$\frac{1}{2}$ |
|
Net
Working Hours/Shift |
$7$ |
$7$ |
|
Total
Hours/day |
$7$ |
$\approx
14$ |
|
Total
Hours/month (25 days/month) |
$175$ |
$350$ |
|
No.
of DE operators |
$8$ |
$8$ |
|
Total
Op-Hours/month |
$1400$ |
$2800$ |
|
No.
of entries/Op./Hr (63 entries in 7 hours) |
$\approx
9$ |
$\approx
8$ |
|
Total
entries/month |
$\frac{144,000}{12,600}$ |
$\frac{288,000}{25,200}$ |
Note:
The number of applications processed per month seems to be 12,600 for 1
shift and 25,200 for 2 shifts.
(Manpower
Cost Estimate)
MANPOWER
COST-ESTIMATE / SHIFT/MONTH
|
Type
of Manpower |
No.
of Persons Required |
Monthly
Salary Rs |
Total
wage Per/Month for 1 shift |
|
DE
Operator |
8 |
2,500 |
20,000 |
|
Peon |
1 |
1,200 |
1,200 |
|
Clerk |
2 |
2,000 |
4,000 |
|
Supervisor |
1 |
5,000 |
5,000 |
|
Manager |
1 |
10,000 |
10,000 |
|
Security
Guard |
1 |
3,500 |
3,500 |
|
TOTAL |
14 |
43,700 |
(Material
Cost)
MATERIAL
COST / SHIFT/MONTH
|
Item |
Rate
unit. Rs |
Units
consumed per shift/month |
Total
cost Rs |
Assumption |
|
Floppy |
55 |
10 |
550 |
1200
records per floppy |
|
Printing
Ribbon |
300 |
10 |
3,000 |
1200
records per ribbon |
|
Continuous
Printing Stationery |
$\leftarrow$
To be supplied by TOI $\rightarrow$ |
|||
|
Box
Files |
$\leftarrow$ |
$\rightarrow$ |
||
|
TOTAL |
Note:
The total cost is not summed but appears to be $550 + 3000 = 3,550$. This value
is later referenced as 1,250 in the summary, indicating $3,550$ may be the
combined printing/floppy cost for a higher volume or that the Material Cost is
actually meant to be 1,250 as per the next file.
(Additional
Overhead Cost)
ADDITIONAL
OVERHEAD COST / SHIFT / MONTH
|
Item |
Rate
Unit Rs |
No.
of Units consumed / shift / month |
Total
Cost / Shift (Rs.) |
Assumption |
|
Power
for Lighting & running Computers |
$6
/ \text{kWh}$ |
$17$ |
$102
\times 25 = 2,550$ |
8
computer $\times 300 = 2400 \text{ watts/hr} \times 7 = 16800 \text{
watts/day}$ i.e. 17 units. |
|
Power
for Air Conditions (3 A/c @ 1.5 T) |
$6
/ \text{kWh}$ |
$60$ |
$360
\times 25 = 9,000$ |
|
|
Computer
Rental |
9,000 |
Existing:
$5500 \times 1 = 5500$, $2200 \times 4 = 8800$. New (Node): $5000 \times 1 =
5000$. $27,100 / \text{ per month}$ $\therefore \text{Per Shift} =
9000 / \text{ per shift per month}$ |
||
|
Contract
Maintenance Cost per Shift/month (inclu. spares) |
5,000 |
|||
|
Snacks/Tea
for 14 persons |
$17.5
\text{ (Total daily cost)}$ |
$210
\times 25 = 5,250$ |
Tea
$= 2.5 \times 2 \times 5 = 25 \text{ Rs}$, Snacks $= 2.0 \times 1 \times 10 =
20 \text{ Rs}$, Total Daily Cost $\approx \text{Rs } 210$ |
|
|
TOTAL |
30,800 |
(Total
Cost Summary)
TOTAL
COST SUMMARY
|
Per
shift per month |
||
|
1. |
Manpower
Cost |
43,700 |
|
2. |
Material
Cost |
1,250 |
|
3. |
Overhead
Cost |
30,800 |
|
TOTAL |
75,750 |
|
|
Add
Contingencies @ 10% |
7,575 |
|
|
Grand
Total per shift / month |
83,325 |
Cost
/ Record (application) processed
$$=
\frac{83,325 \text{ (per shift)}}{12,600 \text{ (per shift)}}$$
$$=
\mathbf{6.60}$$
$$\text{Add
} \frac{\text{Software development}}{\text{ & maintenance cost}} =
\mathbf{0.40}$$
$$\text{TOTAL
} = \mathbf{7.00 \text{ per application}}$$



























