Monday, 30 October 2000

ORDER EXECUTION SYSTEM -FEATURES & FUNCTIONS

Feature/ Functionality
 1. "It would be a client - server based solution with WEB - ENABLED COMPONENTS, for future expansion and integration, using web - technology"
2. Auto mailing to candidates short listed.
3. Extensive MIS Reports Balance of Payments for each P.O./ Client etc.
Documentation of follow - up for the Balance of payment
MIS reports of the cases handle, advance given, B.O.P./ Receivables etc., client - wise, P.O. Wise, Consultant – wise & Date - wise.
B.O.P. reminder for each client, P.O, documentation on correspondence on follow - up
4. Audit trail
5. Auto - emailing the alerts to the potential candidates about the new requirements. Auto email to candidate once the client selects the CV for a particular assignment.
6. Alerts to the clients on the availability of new CV's as per their requirement.
7. All the correspondence with the client & the candidates.
Logs of who accessed what files when (S / 1)
Integration of server based "call - centre", permitting "access" (as per rights) to monitor order execution process to
·     Consultants (immediately /now)
·     Clients / candidates / Experts / Asso. etc. (Later)
Intranet - Extranet - Internet (Migration)
Auto generation of Shopping Basket Summary (Client/ Consultant/ Branch/ Industry/ Func/ Desi. Level/ Date wise)(F/3)
Follow - up of each / every shopping Basket (F/ 3)

 P.O. Summaries (Just like shop. Basket Summaries) (F/3)
Auto Generation of Invoices
Client/ Value - wise OUTSTANDING statements (F/4)
Automate all communications & Maintain a log   (F/4)
No data should be required to be entered twice (G/1)
Advertised vacancy to be treated as P.O.  (G/1)
All searches (of any type) in OES to start by clicking on a CORPORATE NAME (Which is the ANCHOR Point/ Main  Gate) All entry, only thru CORPORATE name.
Every data/ Field to be linked to a CORPORATE NAME  (G/2)
Determination/ fixation of ACTIVITY STANDARD TIME (AST) before start of an assignment (G/2)
Comparison of ACTUAL ACTIVITY TIME (AAT) with AST & reporting "Variance" (G/2) (Built - in " Consultant - Productivity" measurement for performance evaluation)
In case of "ON - LINE SALE OF RESUMES", the order Execution Module Should
·     Calculate amt. payable by client
·     Automatically send and "offer / quotation" to client.
·     Sent relevant/ concerned resumes to client as soon as concerned consultant (who is handling that shopping Basket) has entered the D/D details in the O/E module.
 "We have also included the Finance Management Module as per your "suggestion"
"we have taken care that the system proposed would cater your future requirements of integration with the web - enabled applications "....." It would be a Client Server based solution with WEB ENABLES COMPONENTS for the future expansions and integration using the web - technology"
Documentation of follow - up for Balance of Payment B.O.P. reminder for each client, P.O, documentation on Correspondence on the follow - up.
    - MIS Daily/ Weekly/ Monthly statistics
           - 3 Dimensions (No. / Time Frame/ Rewards)
           - Interview Feedback from client
           - Order Backlog / Pending Assignment Analysis
           - 10 standard statements.
    - Interview Follow - up
           - Follow - up with our own staff/ candidates/ clients
           - 18 Screens (pop - up) of paperless office
           - Order Execution Master Chart
           - Help Desk & Queries.
           - Shopping Basket as P.O. and follow - up
           - P.O. - Summaries should get generated
           - List of all resumes ever sent to a given client
    - For a given candidate, which are the clients to whom his resume is sent ever
    - Integration of server - based call - centre, permitting access to monitor O/E/ to consultants   (Only)
    - "Pop - Up Screens" thru manual typing
    - Auto email of std. letters/ fax.  
"Annotation" of all incoming/ outgoing Communications (email/ fax/ letter/ phone - call) with "keywords" letter using      a COMMUNICATION WIZARD & creating a chronological "string history" for other Execution follow - up
  Corporate Profiles
      . Data Capture Screen AND
      . Data base structures
must be same, whether offline or online
Editing or Corporate Profiles
     . Offline by consultants
     . Online by concerned "Personnel Manager"
Future integration our order Execution System with
ORACLE FRONT OFFICE SUITE
Automatic extraction/ Creation of
     . Phone database
     . Fax database
     . Email database
     . Postal address database
     . Mobile No. database
Incorporation of PIM (Personal Info. Mgmt) Software’s into
 order Execution Module
- Capability to move from "Help Desk/ call - centre
              To
"Fully interactive web based Single Interface"
- Capability to integrate in future IVRS for capture of resumes.
- Follow up/ Reminder (Communication) strategy to cover all modes (viz); phone/ fax/ email/ sms/ wap/ letter
- Online sale of resumes (after online quotation), to be capable of receiving/ accounting payments over internet
- Trigger for "follow - up" reminders what/ who/ when/ whom (Morning Greeting Screen to each Consultant)
- Unique code no. for each CORPORATE.
h.c.parekh

ORDER EXECUTION SYSTEM

Tapan - Jayant (Applitech - A'had)
Sudhakar (Applitech - Mumbai
I refer to
. Your email of Oct. 18
. Sudhakar's letter of Oct. 19
(Enclosing 33 pages/ 80 output formats of 'Requirement Catalog')
. Neeraj's letter of Oct. 20
. Our telecom of Oct. 25th
We were closed for 4 days for Diwali & re-opened today - hence the delay in responding. To answer Neeraj's letter, I will need to talk to Mr. Nagle/ Mr. Cyril. Cyril is in Dubai & expected back by this weekend. When I received your 80 output formats, I found that these were not grouped logically, so I spent some time “re - grouping" these as follows.
PROGRAMMING OF OUTPUT FORMATS
Group 1
 Shopping Basket     (18-19-20-21-22-23-24-25)
 Inquiry          (55-56-57-58-59-60-61-62-76-77)
Group 2
Proposal         (26)
Sales Order                  (27, 28, 33)
Pending Orders        (7-8-9-10-11-12-13-14-15-16-17-80)
Group 3
Resumes         (5, 6, 30, 36)
Interviews                    (4, 31, 78, 79)
Follow - up                   (1, 34, 35, 39)
Advertising                   (29, 40, 41)
Group 4
Invoice            (32, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67)
Compensation          (2, 3, 38)
Customer Outstanding      ( ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?)
Group 5
Client List                 (51, 52, 53, 54)
Janam Kundle (Client)         (37, 42)
Janam Kundli (Candidate)    (43, 68)
Group 6
Executives placed       (44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50)
Analysis of Order Executed(69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75)
To view all related formats at one glance, I cut these out and posted on large sheets. So, broadly speaking, there are 6 groups and 16 topics/ subjects covered by these 6 groups. Total no. of statements (viz : 80), in reality are only 16 Statements. It is because of "re - arrangement" of fields (Industry wise/ Function wise/ Desig. Level wise/ Branch wise/ Consultant - wise/ Period wise etc. etc.), that the total no. gets inflated.
Once immediate observations :
I do not find any statement on "Customer Outstanding" / "Balance of Payments" (in several different ways).These are an ABSOLUTE MUST. These are already covered in
. your first proposal dt Aug. 21
. Your second proposal dt. Sept. 12
. Our meeting on spet. 1
. My mail dt. sept. 20
Please cover these under Group 4 & let me see the formats.
Another Observations:
 It is quite likely that each future/ functionality covered by order Execution module, does NOT have an "output statement" (need not have one). But we must have a clear, prior, written, understanding whether or not a given feature/ functionality will be incorporated in order Execution system. I request you to carefully go thru these pages and enter your comments in the last column - then return a photo -   copy for our study. Or we could fill - up this column jointly during your next visit (When?)
cc: Mr. Nagle
cc: Nirmit

h.c.parekh 

SHOPPING BASKET SUMMARY

Image 1: SHOPPING BASKET SUMMARY (BRANCH-WISE)

BRANCH RESPONSIBLE:
Consultant Responsible:

Maybe, in all other statements on shopping baskets, what we should do, is to simply add one more column, titled
“Branch”
next to the column titled → “Consultant Responsible”

so that “Branch-wise” statement can be generated as a “bye-product.”

Within each branch, we could group all shopping baskets “Consultant-wise.”


EXECUTIVES APPOINTED SO FAR

(A) – Industry Wise

Name of Industry:

Client Corpo.Order No. / DatePosition/VacancyPerson Exec. Appt. + PENAppt. At (Salary cpa / Design. Level)Func.Bill Amt.

                                                                    (B) – Function Wise

Function:

(Table space left blank)


(C) – Designation Level Wise

Desig. Level:

(Table with multiple columns left blank)


(D) – CLIENT WISE

Client Names:

(Table with multiple columns left blank)


SHOPPING BASKET (DESIGNATION-LEVEL WISE)

Desig. Level:

Basket NoURL from which arrivedDate ArrivedDate RepliedActual Time Taken (days)Consultant ResponsibleWhether conv. into orderFuncIndPEN

SHOPPING BASKET – FUNCTION-WISE

Function: ______________________

Basket NoURL from which cameDate ArrivedDate RepliedActual Time Taken (Days)Consultant ResponsibleWhether Conv. into OrderInd.Desig. LevelPEN

Image 6: SHOPPING BASKET – INDUSTRY-WISE

Name of Industry: ______________________

Basket NoArrived DateReplied DateTime TakenConsultant ResponsibleURL from which cameWhether Conv. into OrderFunc.Desig. LevelPEN

Image 7: SHOPPING BASKET – CLIENT/CORPORATE WISE

Name of Corpo/Client:
Address:
Phone: ___________________ Email: ___________________
Fax:
Name of Contact Person:
Desig.:

Basket No (clickable link)Arrived DateReplied DateActual Time Taken (days)Variance (+/- days)Consultant ResponsibleWhether Converted into OrderSource Website URLNo. of Resumes Shortlisted (PEN)

                            Clicking on this link will open up "Consultant-wise statement of Shop Baskets"

Image 8: SHOPPING BASKETS – CONSULTANT-WISE

Name of Consultant: ______________________

Source Website URLBasket NoArrived DateReplied DateActual Time Taken (days)Variance (+/- days)Corpo. NamePosting CityNo. of Resumes Shortlisted (PEN)Whether Converted into Order

                    Clicking on this link will open up particular basket details

Clicking on Corpo. Name would lead to "CORPO/CLIENT WISE SHOPPING BASKETS statement"



SHOPPING BASKETS (MS/1)

  • Shopping Basket No

  • Date Recd

  • Date Replied (Terms Sent)

  • Who Replied (Name of Consultant)

  • Name of Sender (Executive)

  • “ ” (Company)/Client

  • Contact Info (Add / Phone / Fax / Email)

  • Industry Name (Company belongs to)

  • Position / Vacancy Details

    • Designation Level

    • Actual Designation (?)

    • Function

    • Industry

  • Main Specifications

    • Age

    • Exp

    • Edu. Qualification

    • Skills

CLIENTS

Clients → Basic Data / Client Profile
→ Proposals
→ Final Order
→ Correspondence
→ Billing


Clients

  • Old clients

  • New clients

  • Associ

Order Execution System (1/5)

Dated: Oct. 30, 2000
To:
Tapan – Jayant (Apsflitech – Aked)
Sudhakar (C19 – Mumbai)


Order Execution System

I refer to
▶ Your email of Oct. 18
▶ Sudhakar’s letter of Oct. 19
(enclosing 33 pages / 80 output formats & Requirement Catalog)
▶ Neeraj’s letter of Oct. 20
▶ Our telecon of Oct. 25th

We were closed for 4 days for Diwali & re-opened today – hence the delay in responding.

To answer Neeraj’s letter, I will need to talk to Mr. Nagle / Mr. Cyril. Cyril is in Dubai & expected back by this weekend.

When I received your 80 output formats, I found that these were not grouped logically, so I spent some time “re-grouping” these as follows:


REGROUPING OF OUTPUT FORMATS (2/5)

Group 1

Shopping Basket (18–19–20–21–22–23–24–25)
Inquiry (55–56–57–58–59–60–61–62–76–77)


Group 2

Proposal (26)
Sales Order (27, 28, 33)
Pending Orders (7–8–9–10–11–12–13–14–15–16–17–80)


Group 3

Resumes (5, 6, 30, 36)
Interviews (4, 31, 78, 79)
Follow-Up (1, 34, 35, 39)
Advertising (29, 40, 41)


Group 4

Invoice (32, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67)
Compensation (2, 3, 38)
Customer Outstandings ( ? ? ? ? ? ? )


Group 5

  • Client List (51, 52, 53, 54)

  • Janam Kundli (Client) (37, 42)

  • ▶ “ ” “ (Candidate) (43, 68)


Group 6

  • Executives Placed (44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50)

  • Analysis of Orders Executed (69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75)

To view all related formats at one glance, I cut these out and pasted on large sheets.
(See Annex: B enclosed)


So, broadly speaking, there are 6 groups & 16 topics/subjects covered by these 6 groups.

Total no. of statements (viz: 80), in reality are only 16 statements.

It is because of "re-arrangement" of fields (industry-wise / function-wise / Desig. level-wise / branch-wise / consultant-wise / period-wise etc. etc.); that the total no. gets inflated.


One immediate observation:

I do not find any statement on
“Customer Outstandings” / “Balance of Payments”
(in several different ways).

These are an ABSOLUTE MUST.


These were already covered in:
▶ Your first proposal dt Aug. 21
▶ Your second proposal dt Sept. 12
▶ Our meeting on Sept. 1
▶ My email dt Sept. 20

Please cover these under Group 4 & let me see the formats.


Another Observation:

It is quite likely that each feature/functionality covered by Order Execution Module does NOT have an "Output Statement" (need not have one).


But we must have a clear, prior, written understanding whether or not
a given feature/functionality will be incorporated in Order Execution System.


With this in mind, I enclose:

Annex: A (nine pages)
“Order Execution System” (Features & Functions)


I request you to carefully go thru these pages and enter your comments in the last column – then return a photocopy for our study.
Or we could fill up this column jointly during your next visit (when?).


Regards
H. Parekh

cc: Mr. Nagle
cc: Nirmit

Order Execution System

Dated: Oct. 30, 2000
To:
Tapan – Jayant (Applitech – Aked)
Sudhakar (C19 – Mumbai)


Order Execution System

I refer to:
▶ Your email of Oct. 18
▶ Sudhakar’s letter of Oct. 19
(enclosing 33 pages / 80 output formats & Requirement Catalog)
▶ Neeraj’s letter of Oct. 20
▶ Our telecon of Oct. 25


We were closed for 4 days for Diwali & re-opened today – hence the delay in responding.


To answer Neeraj’s letter, I will need to talk to Mr. Nagle / Mr. Cyril.
Cyril is in Dubai & expected back by this weekend.


When I received your 80 output formats, I found that these were not grouped logically, so I spent some time “re-grouping” these as follows:


egrouping of Output Formats


Group 1

Shopping Basket – (18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25)
Inquiry – (55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 76, 77)


Group 2

Proposal – (26)
Sales Order – (27, 28, 33)
Pending Orders – (7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 80)


Group 3

Resumes – (5, 6, 30, 36)
Interviews – (4, 31, 78, 79)
Follow-Up – (1, 34, 35, 39)
Advertising – (29, 40, 41)


Group 4

Invoice – (32, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67)
Compensation – (2, 3, 38)
Customer Outstandings – (? ? ? ? ? ?)


Page 3/5 – Continuation: Groups 5 & 6


Group 5

Client List – (51, 52, 53, 54)
Janam Kundli (Client) – (37, 42)
Janam Kundli (Candidate) – (43, 68)


Group 6

Executives Placed – (44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50)
Analysis of Orders Executed – (69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75)


To view all related formats at one glance, I cut these out and pasted on large sheets.
(See Annex: B enclosed)


So broadly speaking, there are 6 groups & 16 topics/subjects covered by these 6 groups.

Total no. of statements (viz: 80), in reality are only 16 statements.


Page 4/5 – Observation & Missing Format

It is because of “re-arrangement” of fields
(Industry-wise / Function-wise / Designation level-wise / Branch-wise / Consultant-wise / Period-wise etc.)
that the total number gets inflated.


One immediate observation:

I do not find any statement on
“Customer Outstandings” / “Balance of Payments”
(in several different ways).


These are an ABSOLUTE MUST.


These were already covered in:
▶ Your first proposal dt Aug. 21
▶ Your second proposal dt Sept. 12
▶ Our meeting on Sept. 1
▶ My email dt Sept. 20


Please cover these under Group 4 & let me see the formats.


Page 5/5 – Final Observation

Another Observation:

It is quite likely that each feature/functionality covered by the Order Execution Module does NOT have an “output statement” (need not have one).


But we must have a clear, prior written understanding whether or not
a given feature/functionality will be incorporated in the Order Execution System.


With this in mind, I enclose:
Annex A (nine pages)
“Order Execution System” (Features & Functions)


I request you to carefully go through these pages and enter your comments in the last column – then return a photocopy for our study.
Or we could fill up this column jointly during your next visit (when?).


Regards
[Signature: H. Parekh]

cc: Mr. Nagle
cc: Nirmit